[1]范毛川,余沁楠,朱　峰,等.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放性前列腺癌根治术治疗早期前列腺癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(8):748-751.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011]
　FAN Mao-chuan,YU Qin-nan,ZHU Feng,et al.Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the treatment of early prostate cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):748-751.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011]
点击复制

腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放性前列腺癌根治术治疗早期前列腺癌疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
36
期数:
2019年8
页码:
748-751
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the treatment of early prostate cancer
作者:
范毛川; 余沁楠; 朱　峰; 张会清
（新乡医学院第一附属医院泌尿外科，河南　卫辉　453100）
Author(s):
FAN Mao-chuan; YU Qin-nan; ZHU Feng; ZHANG Hui-qing
(Department of Urinary Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University,Weihui 453100,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
前列腺癌; 腹腔镜手术; 开放性手术; 前列腺癌根治术
Keywords:
prostate cancer; laparoscopic operation; open operation; radical prostatectomy
分类号:
R737.25
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放性前列腺癌根治术治疗早期前列腺癌的临床效果及安全性。方法　选择2013年9月至2016年1月新乡医学院第一附属医院收治的早期前列腺癌患者48例，根据治疗方法分为腹腔镜手术组（n=28）和开放性手术组（n=20）。开放性手术组患者行开放性前列腺癌根治术，腹腔镜手术组患者行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术。记录2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、引流管留置时间、导尿管留置时间及胃肠功能恢复时间；观察2组患者术后并发症发生情况；术后6个月，使用B型超声测定患者排泄后残留尿量（PVR），尿动力学分析仪检测患者最大尿流率（Qmax），并对2组患者进行国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS）；所有患者术后随访2 a，观察术后生化复发情况。结果　腹腔镜手术组患者手术时间长于开放性手术组，住院时间、引流管留置时间、导尿管留置时间、胃肠功能恢复时间短于开放性手术组，术中出血量少于开放性手术组（P<0.05）。腹腔镜手术组患者术后发生肠梗阻1例（3.57%），尿漏3例（10.71%），尿道狭窄6例（21.43%）；开放性手术组患者术后发生肠梗阻6例（30.00%），尿漏2例（10.00%），尿道狭窄4例（20.00%）；腹腔镜手术组患者术后肠梗阻发生率低于开放性手术组（P<0.05），但2组患者术后尿漏及尿道狭窄发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。腹腔镜手术组患者术后1周及1、3、6个月尿失禁发生率分别为3.57%（1/28）、3.57%（1/28）、0.00%（0/28）、0.00%（0/28），开放性手术组患者术后1周及1、3、6个月尿失禁发生率分别为30.00%（6/20）、25.00%（5/20）、15.00%（3/20）、5.00%（1/20）；腹腔镜手术组患者术后1周及1、3个月尿失禁发生率低于开放性手术组（P<0.05），但2组患者术后6个月尿失禁发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后6个月，与开放性手术组比较，腹腔镜手术组患者PVR减少，IPSS评分降低，Qmax升高（P<0.05）。腹腔镜手术组患者术后1、2 a生化复发率分别为7.14%（2/28）、14.29%（4/28），开放性手术组患者术后1、2 a生化复发率分别为10.00%（2/20）、15.00%（3/20）；2组患者术后1、2 a生化复发率比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论　腹腔镜手术治疗早期前列腺癌具有创伤小、术中出血少、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the treatment of early prostate cancer.Methods　Forty-eight patients with early prostate cancer admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from September 2013 to January 2016 were divided into laparoscopic operation group (n=28) and open operation group (n=20).The patients in the open group were performed with open radical prostatectomy,and the patients in the laparoscopic operation group were treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,hospitalization time,retention time of drainage tube,retention time of catheter and recovery time of gastrointestinal function of the patients in the two groups were recorded.The complications of the patients were observed.Six months after operation,the postvoid residual (PVR) was measured by B-mode ultrasound,and the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was detected by urodynamic analyzer,and the patients were evaluate by international prostate symptom score (IPSS).All patients were followed up for two years to observe the biochemical recurrence after operation.Results　Compared with the open operation group,the operation time was longer,the hospitalization time,retention time of drainage tube,retention time of catheter,recovery time of gastrointestinal function were shorter,and the intraoperative bleeding volume was less in the aparoscopic operation group (P<0.05).There was one case (3.57%) of intestinal obstruction occurred,3 cases (10.71%) of urinary leakage and 6 cases (21.43%) of urethral stricture in the laparoscopic operation group;there were 6 cases (30.00%) of intestinal obstruction,2 cases (10.00%) of urinary leakage and 4 cases (20.00%) of urethral stricture in the open operation group.The incidence of intestinal obstruction in the laparoscopic operation group was lower than that in the open operation group (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the incidence of urinary leakage and urethral stricture between the two groups (P>0.05).The incidence of urinary incontinence at 1 week,1,3 and 6 months after operation in the laparoscopic operation group was 3.57% (1/28),3.57% (1/28),0.00% (0/28) and 0.00% (0/28),respectively;and it was 30.00% (6/20),25.00% (5/20),15.00% (3/20) and 5.00% (1/20),respectively in the open operation group.The incidence of urinary incontinence in the laparoscopic operation group was lower than that in the open operation group at 1 week,1 and 3 months after operation (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the incidence of urinary incontinence between the two groups at 6 months after operation (P>0.05).Compared with the open operation group,the PVR was fewer,the IPSS score was lower and the Qmax was higher in the laparoscopic operation group at six months after operation(P<0.05).The 1- and 2-year biochemical recurrence rates in laparoscopic operation group were 7.14% (2/28) and 14.29% (4/28),and they were 10.00% (2/20) and 15.00% (3/20) in the open operation group.There was no significant difference in 1- and 2-year biochemical recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion　Laparoscopic operation for early prostate cancer has the advantages of less trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery and fewer complications.

参考文献/References:

［1］　张春雷，陈锐，杨琦，等.单一术者机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术术中指标影响因素分析［J］.第二军医大学学报，2018，39（4）：366-371.
［2］　TANG K Q,PANG S Y,BAO J M,et al.Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer:a retrospective cohort study［J］.J South Med Univ,2017,37(1):1-5.
［3］　REICHARD C A,GREGG J R,ACHIM M F,et al.Radical prosta-tectomy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer:feasibility,safety,and quality of life outcomes［J］.Eur Urol,2018,74(2):140-143.
［4］　余沁楠，侯国栋，薛向东，等.腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术临床疗效观察［J］.新乡医学院学报，2018，35（4）：317-319.
［5］　梁迎春，吴宇鹏，蔡海，等.尿道纤维化对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿控的影响［J］.中华医学杂志，2018，98（14）：1099-1102.
［6］　HOSTIOU T,VERGNOLLES M,ROBERT G,et al.An unusual finding during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy［J］.Clin Infect Dis,2018,67(5):802-804.
［7］　张超，花梅免，王富博，等.虚拟现实培训在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术膀胱尿道吻合中的应用［J］.第二军医大学学报，2018，39（12）：1381-1384.
［8］　CHAUSSY C G,THROFF S.High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer:a review［J］.J Endourol,2017,31(S1):S30-S37.
［9］　PATEL V R,PALMER K J,COUGHLIN G,et al.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:perioperative outcomes of 1 500 cases［J］.J Endourol,2007,22(10):2299-2305.
［10］　董超然，陈鑫，刘晓东，等.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放手术的临床比较［J］.内蒙古医学杂志，2015，47（5）：616-617.

相似文献/References:

[1]张会清,张英杰,窦启峰,等.经尿道电汽化切除术治疗前列腺癌[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(06):447.
[2]牛保华,高新平,胡艳牧.p16 蛋白在前列腺癌的表达及其意义[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(04):251.
[3]孙继建,陈春晓,李海营.经尿道前列腺电切联合内分泌治疗高龄前列腺癌疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(05):519.
[4]刘红波,杨　军,丁　浩.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(09):841.
[5]张译心,王秀美,薛晓玲.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂对保守性腹腔镜手术后卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者疼痛及生殖激素水平的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(8):785.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.020]
　ZHANG Yi-xin,WANG Xiu-mei,XUE Xiao-ling.Effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on pain and reproductive hormone levels in patients with ovarian endometriosis after conservative laparoscopic surgery[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):785.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.020]
[6]王政强,王　春.腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(4):386.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.04.020]
　WANG Zhengqiang,WANG Chun.Comparison of the curative effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):386.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.04.020]
[7]彭荣芳,林　芳,钟爱群,等.保留子宫的腹腔镜后路骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗中重度中盆腔缺陷疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(2):156.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.02.013]
　PENG Rongfang,LIN Fang,ZHONG Aiqun,et al.Effect of laparoscopic posterior approach sacrospinous ligament suspension with preservation of uterus in the treatment of moderate and severe mid pelvic defects[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):156.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.02.013]
[8]关新垒,华彩红,王世进,等.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(3):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
　GUAN Xinlei,HUA Caihong,WANG Shijin,et al.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
[9]李　金,周柱玉,王锦亮,等.直肠超声引导下经会阴与经直肠前列腺穿刺活检术临床价值比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(8):747.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.08.010]
　LI Jin,ZHOU Zhuyu,WANG Jinliang,et al.Comparison of clinical value between transperineal and transrectal prostate puncture biopsy guided by rectal ultrasound[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):747.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.08.010]
[10]李　军.不同年龄前列腺癌患者的临床病理特征与生存状况分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(9):862.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.09.013]
　LI Jun.Clinicopathological characteristics and survival status of prostate cancer patients at different ages[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):862.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.09.013]
[11]朱海松.经腹膜外与经腹腔腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(7):626.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.07.006]
　ZHU Haisong.Comparison of curative effect between extraperitoneal and transabdominal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(8):626.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.07.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-05