[1]王松阳,侯红艳,樊松强,等.腹腔镜与开腹幽门环肌切开术治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2017,34(12):1101-1103.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.12.014]
 WANG Song-yang,HOU Hong-yan,FAN Song-qiang,et al.Comparison of the curative effect between laparotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in the treatment of congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2017,34(12):1101-1103.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.12.014]
点击复制

腹腔镜与开腹幽门环肌切开术治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄疗效比较
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
34
期数:
2017年12
页码:
1101-1103
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the curative effect between laparotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in the treatment of congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis
作者:
王松阳1侯红艳2樊松强1李 甲1
(1.漯河市第二人民医院普外科,河南 漯河 462000;2.漯河市第五人民医院急诊科,河南 漯河 462000)
Author(s):
WANG Song-yang1HOU Hong-yan2FAN Song-qiang1LI Jia1
(1.Department of General Surgery,the Second People′s Hospital of Luohe City,Luohe 462000,Henan Province,China;2.Department of Emergency,the Fifth People′s Hospital of Luohe City,Luohe 462000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄幽门环肌切开术腹腔镜
Keywords:
congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosispyloromyotomylaparoscope
分类号:
R725.7
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.12.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较腹腔镜与开腹幽门环肌切开术治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄(CHPS)的临床疗效。方法 选取2010年3月至2016年7月漯河市第二人民医院收治的CHPS患儿63例,根据治疗方法将患儿分为腹腔镜手术组(n=31)和开腹手术组(n=32),腹腔镜手术组患儿行腹腔镜幽门环肌切开术,开腹手术组患儿行开腹幽门环肌切开术,对2组患儿的手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复喂养时间、住院时间、并发症、胃内压及食管下端括约肌压 (LESP)进行比较。结果 2组患儿手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.277,P>0.05);腹腔镜手术组患儿术后住院时间及恢复喂养时间显著短于开腹手术组(t=14.302、17.935,P<0.05),术中出血量显著少于开腹手术组(t=13.064,P<0.05)。术前2组患儿的胃内压、LESP比较差异均无统计学意义(t=0.316、0.529,P>0.05),2组患儿术后胃内压显著低于术前(t=10.613、9.851,P<0.05),2组患儿术后LESP与术前比较差异均无统计学意义(t=2.643、2.772,P>0.05),术后2组患儿的胃内压、LESP比较差异均无统计学意义(t=0.237、0.329,P>0.05)。开腹手术组和腹腔镜手术组患儿术后并发症发生率分别为15.63%(5/32)、3.23%(1/31),腹腔镜手术组患儿并发症发生率显著低于开腹手术组(χ2=3.991,P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜下幽门环肌切开术治疗CHPS可以有效解除幽门狭窄,且具有创伤小、患儿术后恢复快、并发症少等特点。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect between laparotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in the treatment of congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (CHPS).Methods Sixty-three children with CHPS were selected from March 2010 to July 2016 in the Second People′s Hospital of Luohe City.The children were divided into laparoscopic operation group (n=31) and laparotomy group (n=32) according to the treatment methods.The children in the laparoscopic operation group were treated with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy,and the children in the laparotomy group were treated with laparotomy.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative recovery feeding time,hospitalization time,complications,intragastric pressure and lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=0.277,P>0.05).The postoperative hospitalization time and recovery feeding time in the laparoscopic operation group were significantly shorter than those in the laparotomy group (t=14.302,17.935;P<0.05),and the intraoperative blood loss in the laparoscopic operation group was significantly less than that in the laparotomy group (t=13.064,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the intragastric pressure and LESP between the two groups before operation (t=0.316,0.529;P>0.05).The intragastric pressure after operation was significantly lower than that before operation in the two groups (t=10.613,9.851;P<0.05).There was no significant difference in LESP before and after operation in the two groups (t=2.643,2.772;P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the intragastric pressure and LESP between the two groups after operation (t=0.237,0.329;P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the laparotomy group and laparoscopic operation group was 15.63% (5/32) and 3.23% (1/31) respectively,the incidence of complications in laparoscopic operation group was significantly lower than that in laparotomy group (χ2=3.991,P<0.05).Conclusion laparoscopic pyloromyotomy can effectively relieve pyloric stenosis in the treatment of CHPS,and it has the characteristics of small trauma,quick recovery and less complications.

参考文献/References:

[1] 佘亚雄.小儿外科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1985:114.
[2] ALAIN J L,CROUSSEAU D,TERRIER G.Extramucosal pyloromyolomy by laparoscopy[J].Surg Endosc,1991,5(4):174-175.
[3] 侯苏.不同气腹压对腹腔镜手术患儿围手术期血气的影响[J].现代医学,2014,42(9):983-986.
[4] 冯志强,聂玉强,张又祥.先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄发病机制研究进展[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2010,19(2):187-188.
[5] 黄国英,林其珊,钱蔷英.小儿临床超声诊断学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2006:372-373.
[6] 阿布都赛米·阿布都热依木,王苏浦,李凯,等.婴儿先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄的腹腔镜手术治疗体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015,20(2):116-118.
[7] 胡玉刚,崔华雷,王金江.先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄微创手术治疗的研究进展[J].吉林医学,2012,33(24):5307-5308.
[8] 李万福,马柱,李朝旺,等.幽门环肌切开术与开腹手术治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄有效性和安全性Meta分析[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2013,28(18):1433-1436.
[9] MUENSTERER O J,ADIBE O O,HARMON C M,et al.Single-incision laparoscopic pyloromyotomy:initial experience[J].Surg Endosc,2010,24(7):1589-1593.
[10] 张悦,马丽霜,张艳霞,等.经脐单部位切口和传统腹腔镜治疗婴儿幽门狭窄的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(5):398-401.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-05