[1]关新垒,华彩红,王世进,等.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(3):243-245.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
　GUAN Xinlei,HUA Caihong,WANG Shijin,et al.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(3):243-245.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
点击复制

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年3
页码:
243-245
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-12

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma
作者:
关新垒; 华彩红; 王世进; 秦海霞; 王圆圆; 刘春阁
（新乡医学院第一附属医院妇科，河南　卫辉　453100）
Author(s):
GUAN Xinlei; HUA Caihong; WANG Shijin; QIN Haixia; WANG Yuanyuan; LIU Chunge
(Department of Gynecology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University,Weihui 453100,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
子宫肌瘤; 子宫肌瘤剔除术; 腹腔镜手术; 开腹手术
Keywords:
hysteromyoma; myomectomy; laparoscopic operation; laparotomy
分类号:
R737.33
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤的临床效果。方法　选择2016年1月至2018年6月新乡医学院第一附属医院收治的78例巨大子宫肌瘤患者为研究对象，按照手术方式将患者分为腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组，每组39例。腹腔镜手术组患者行腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术，开腹手术组患者行传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术。比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次排气时间及术后住院时间；出院前评估2组患者临床疗效；所有患者术后随访1 a，观察月经转归、子宫形态、子宫肌瘤复发及并发症发生情况。结果　腹腔镜手术组患者手术时间、术后首次排气时间及术后住院时间短于开腹手术组，术中出血量少于开腹手术组（P<0.05）。腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组患者术后并发症发生率分别为7.69%（3/39）、25.64%（10/39），腹腔镜手术组患者术后并发症发生率低于开腹手术组（χ2=4.523，P<0.05）。术后1 a，腹腔镜手术组患者月经转归率、子宫形态恢复正常率、子宫肌瘤复发率分别为84.62%（33/39）、94.87%（37/39）、5.13%（2/39）；开腹手术组患者月经转归率、子宫形态恢复正常率、子宫肌瘤复发率分别为61.54%（24/39）、76.92%（30/39）、7.69%（3/39）；腹腔镜手术组患者月经转归率、子宫形态恢复正常率高于开腹手术组（χ2=5.278、5.186，P<0.05）；2组患者子宫肌瘤复发率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.244，P<0.05）。结论　与传统开腹手术比较，腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术具有创伤小、患者术后恢复快、并发症少等优势。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma.Methods　A total of 78 patients with giant hysteromyoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from January 2016 to June 2018 were selected as the study objects,and the patients were divided into laparoscopic operation group and open operation group according to the operation mode,with 39 cases in each group.The patients in the laparoscopic operation group underwent laparoscopic myomectomy,the patients in the open operation group underwent traditional open myomectomy.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,the first postoperative exhaust time and postoperative hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.The clinical effect of patients in the two groups was evaluated before discharge.All the patients were followed up for one year to observe the menstrual recovery,uterine morphology,hysteromyoma recurrence and complications.Results　The operation time,the first postoperative exhaust time and the postoperative hospitalization time of patients in the laparoscopic operation group were shorter than those in the open operation group,and the intraoperative bleeding volume of patients in the laparoscopic operation group was less than that in the open operation group (P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic operation group and the open operation group was 7.69% (3/39) and 25.64% (10/39),respectively.The incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic operation group was lower than that in the open operation group (χ2=4.523,P<0.05).One year after operation,the recovery rate of menstruation,uterine morphology and the recurrence rate of hysteromyoma in the laparoscopic operation group were 84.62% (33/39),94.87% (37/39) and 5.13% (2/39)；and they were 61.54% (24/39),76.92% (30/39) and 7.69% (3/39) in the open operation group.The recovery rates of menstruation and uterine morphology in the laparoscopic operation group were higher than those in the open operation group (χ2=5.278,5.186；P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of hysteromyoma between the two groups (χ2=0.244,P>0.05).Conclusions　Compared with the traditional open myomectomy,laparoscopic myomectomy has the advantages of less trauma,faster postoperative recovery and fewer complications.

参考文献/References:

［1］　欧阳晨捷.子宫肌瘤的发病机制研究进展［J］.中南医学科学杂志，2016,44（6）：708-711.
［2］　夏晓梦，方小玲.子宫肌瘤手术的相关策略与妊娠结局［J］.实用妇产科杂志，2017，33（4）：254-256.
［3］　赵叶芳，王炳杰.开腹与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤的效果、内分泌状态及性功能对比［J］.中国妇产科临床杂志，2018，19（5）：437-438.
［4］　子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识专家组.子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识［J］.中华妇产科杂志，2017，52（12）：793-800.
［5］　崔楠，张景宏.腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术对子宫肌瘤患者术后胃肠功能恢复及血清IFN-γ、Ang Ⅱ水平变化的影响［J］.实用医学杂志，2017，33（24）：4130-4133.
［6］　蒋建发，万亚军，薛敏.Myosure宫腔镜组织切除系统治疗无性生活子宫黏膜下肌瘤6例［J］.中国微创外科杂志，2019，19（3）：278-280.
［7］　朱蓉.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤疗效比较［J］.新乡医学院学报，2018，35（12）：1094-1096．
［8］　赵巧霞，王宝金.高强度聚焦超声子宫肌瘤消融术对子宫内膜容受性、性激素水平及妊娠结局的影响［J］.安徽医药，2019，23（5）：942-945.
［9］　李虎，胡丽娜.子宫肌瘤的非手术治疗进展［J］.中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2019，35（8）：872-877.
［10］　刘志宇，李慧.子宫肌瘤治疗新进展［J］.现代中西医结合杂志，2016，25（29）：3304-3306.
［11］　张星，陈宜斌，皮丹，等.充气式可视性密闭取物装置在腹腔镜子宫瘤术中的应用价值［J］.结直肠肛门外科，2018，24（11）：133-134.
［12］　李振略，赵秉诚，刘卫锋，等.子宫切除术后肠麻痹的发生率及危险因素［J］.国际麻醉学与复苏杂志，2018，39（12）：1128.
［13］　郑霞，朱烨.开腹与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术对多发或巨大子宫肌瘤的疗效对比［J］.实用癌症杂志，2018，33（1）：140-142.
［14］　ZEREM E,KUNOSIC S,HANDANAGIC A,et al.Minimally invasive treatment for appendiceal mass formed after acute perforated appendicitis［J］.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2017,27(3):132-138.
［15］　陶春梅，王玉玲，郑玉华，等.腹腔镜下大子宫全切术中不同缩减宫体法的临床效果分析［J］.中国妇幼健康研究，2019，30（5）：642-645.

相似文献/References:

[1]周玲生.子宫腺肌病178例临床病理分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(05):363.
[2]张淑爱.多疗程米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤42例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(05):380.
[3]张淑爱.多疗程米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤42 例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(05):380.
[4]史沛,胡宗杰,茹凤娟.症状性子宫肌瘤动脉栓塞术的疗效观察 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(02):183.
[5]冯晓萍,万淑琼.K i-67、雌激素受体及孕激素受体在子宫肌瘤中的表达[J].新乡医学院学报,2014,31(11):957.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2014.11.027]
[6]刘秋瑾,张　凯,刘红杰,等.不同血栓风险评估模型预测经宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除患者术后深静脉血栓形成的临床价值比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(1):019.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.01.005]
　LIU Qiujin,ZHANG Kai,LIU Hongjie,et al.Comparison of the clinical value of different thrombus risk assessment models in predicting deep vein thrombosis of patients after transcervical resection of myoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(3):019.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.01.005]
[7]董　燕,杨英艺,龙泳伶.高强度聚焦超声联合四黄水蜜外敷治疗子宫肌瘤疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(3):250.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.011]
　DONG Yan,YANG Ying-yi,LONG Yong-ling.Clinical effect of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with external application of Sihuang shuimi in the treatment of uterine fibroids[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(3):250.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.011]
[8]买　茹.舒适护理对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除患者术后疼痛及生活质量的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(9):824.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.09.019]
　MAI Ru.Effect of comfort nursing on postoperative pain and quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(3):824.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.09.019]
[9]朱　蓉.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(12):1094.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.12.012]
　ZHU Rong.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy and abdominal hysteromyomectomy in the treatment of hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(3):1094.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.12.012]
[10]王　波.血清基质金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂-1、胰岛素样生长因子-1和表皮生长因子水平检测在子宫肌瘤诊断中的价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(12):1098.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.022]
　WANG Bo.Value of serum tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1,insulin like growth factor-1 and epidermal growth factor in the diagnosis of uterus myoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(3):1098.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.022]
[11]王卫华,杨红军,王尚柯,等.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(2):182.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017]
　WANG Weihua,YANG Hongjun,WANG Shangke,et al.Comparison of the application effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(3):182.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-05