[1]郭晓晗,谢瑜娟,秦博,等.超声检查腹直肌分离度及肛提肌裂孔长度和面积对初产妇盆腔器官脱垂的评估作用[J].新乡医学院学报,2023,40(3):238-242.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.03.008]
 GUO Xiaohan,XIE Yujuan,QIN Bo,et al.Value of ultrasound examination of diastasis recti abdominis and the length and area of levator hiatus in evaluating the pelvic organ prolapse in primipara[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2023,40(3):238-242.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.03.008]
点击复制

超声检查腹直肌分离度及肛提肌裂孔长度和面积对初产妇盆腔器官脱垂的评估作用
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
40卷
期数:
2023年3期
页码:
238-242
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of ultrasound examination of diastasis recti abdominis and the length and area of levator hiatus in evaluating the pelvic organ prolapse in primipara
作者:
郭晓晗谢瑜娟秦博陈胜江
(河南科技大学第一附属医院超声科,河南 洛阳 471000)
Author(s):
GUO XiaohanXIE YujuanQIN BoCHEN Shengjiang
(Department of Ultrasonography,the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
超声检查初产妇腹直肌分离度肛提肌裂孔长度肛提肌裂孔面积盆腔器官脱垂
Keywords:
ultrasonography examinationprimiparadiastasis recti abdominislevator hiatus lengthlevator hiatus areapelvic organ prolapse
分类号:
R445.1
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.03.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨超声检查腹直肌分离度(DRA)、肛提肌裂孔长度(LHL)及肛提肌裂孔面积(LHA)对初产妇盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的评估作用。
方法选择2021年4月至2022年5月于河南科技大学第一附属医院分娩后6~12周入院检查盆底肌恢复情况的初产妇110例为研究对象,所有产妇入院后接受超声检查,测量DRA、LHL及LHA;比较不同盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)分期初产妇的DRA、LHL及LHA,采用Spearman相关分析DRA、LHL及LHA与POP-Q分期的相关性,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评价DRA、LHL及LHA对初产妇POP的预测价值。
结果不同POP-Q分期初产妇的脐上3 cm、脐部及脐下3 cm处的DRA比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),Ⅲ、Ⅳ期初产妇各个位置的DRA显著大于Ⅱ期初产妇(P<0.05),Ⅳ期初产妇各个位置的DRA显著大于Ⅲ期初产妇(P<0.05)。不同POP-Q分期初产妇静息状态、Vasalva动作、肛提肌收缩时的LHL、LHA比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),Ⅲ、Ⅳ期初产妇各个状态下的LHL、LHA显著大于Ⅱ期初产妇(P<0.05),Ⅳ期初产妇各个状态下的LHL、LHA显著大于Ⅲ期初产妇(P<0.05)。Spearman相关分析结果显示,初产妇的DRA、LHL及LHA与POP-Q分期均呈正相关(r=0.437、0.512、0.483,P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,单独测量DRA、LHL和LHA预测初产妇POP的曲线下面积比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.958,P>0.05);DRA、LHL、LHA联合预测初产妇POP的曲线下面积显著高于三者单独测量(Z=5.325、3.867、4.312,P<0.05)。DRA、LHL、LHA联合预测初产妇POP的敏感度显著高于三者单独测量(Z=5.764、5.108、3.423,P<0.05);DRA、LHL、LHA联合预测初产妇POP的特异度显著高于三者单独测量(Z=4.231、4.021、3.020,P<0.05);DRA、LHL、LHA联合预测初产妇POP的准确度显著高于三者单独测量(Z=4.325、4.464、3.337,P<0.05)。单独测量DRA、LHL、LHA预测初产妇POP的敏感度、特异度、准确度比较差异无统计学意义(Z=1.021、0.876、1.144,P>0.05)。
结论DRA、LHL、LHA与初产妇POP的严重程度有显著相关性,可作为早期评估产妇盆底功能的有效指标,产后早期可通过超声检查动态监测DRA、LHL、LHA,为临床针对性制定产后康复方案提供参考。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of ultrasound examination of the diastasis recti abdominis (DRA),levator hiatus length (LHL) and levator hiatus area(LHA) in evaluating the pelvic organ prolapse (POP) of primipara.MethodsA total of 110 primipara admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from April 2021 to May 2022 to check the recovery of pelvic floor muscles at 6-12 weeks after delivery were selected as the study subjects.All puerpera received ultrasound examination and the DRA,LHL and LHA were measured after admission.The DRA,LHL and LHA of primipara with different pelvic organ prolapse quantitation (POP-Q) stages were compared.The correlation between DRA,LHL,LHA and POP-Q stage was analyzed by Spearman correlation.The predictive value of DRA,LHL and LHA on the POP of primipara was evaluated by the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsThere were significant differences in DRA at 3 cm above the umbilicus,umbilical part and 3 cm below the umbilicus of primipara in different POP-Q stages (P<0.05).The DRA at each position of primipara in stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly higher than that of primipara in stage Ⅱ (P<0.05).The DRA at each position of primipara in stage Ⅳ was significantly higher than that of primiparain stage Ⅲ (P<0.05).There were significant differences in LHL and LHA of primipara in different POP-Q stages under resting state,Vasalva action and musculi levator ani contraction (P<0.05).The LHL and LHA at each position of primipara in stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ were significantly higher than those of primipara in stage Ⅱ (P<0.05).The LHL and LHA at each position of primipara in stage Ⅳ were significantlyhigher than those of primipara in stage Ⅲ (P<0.05).The Spearman correlation analysis showed that the DRA,LHL and LHA of primipara were positively correlated with POP-Q stage (r=0.437,0.512,0.483;P<0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the area under curve of the separate measurement of DRA,LHL and LHA in predicting POP of primipara (Z=0.958,P>0.05).The area under curve of the combination of DRA,LHL and LHA in predicting the POP of primipara was significantly higher than that of the separate measurement of the three indexes (Z=5.325,3.867,4.312;P<0.05).The sensitivity of the combination of DRA,LHL and LHA to predict the POP of primipara was significantly higher than that of the separate measurement (Z=5.764,5.108,3.423;P<0.05).The specificity of the combination of DRA,LHL and LHA to predict the POP of primipara was significantly higher than that of the separate measurement (Z=4.231,4.021,3.020;P<0.05).The accuracy of the combination of DRA,LHL and LHA in predicting the POP of primipara was significantly higher than that of the separate measurement of the three indexes (Z=4.325,4.464,3.337;P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of DRA,LHL and LHA alone in predicting POP of primipara (Z=1.021,0.876,1.144;P>0.05).ConclusionDRA,LHL,LHA are significantly correlated with theseverity of POP in primipara,which can be used as the effective indexes for early evaluation of pelvic floor function of puerpera.The dynamic monitoring of DRA,LHL and LHA by ultrasound examination in the early postpartum period can provide reference for the formulation of postpartum rehabilitation programs.

参考文献/References:

[1] WEINTRAUB A Y,GLINTER H,MAECUS-BRAUN N.Narrative review of the epidemiology,diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse[J].Int Braz J Urol,2020,46(1):5-14.
[2] MATTSSON N K,KARJALAINEN P K,TOLPPANEN A M,et al.Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life-a nationwide cohort study[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020,222(6):1-10.
[3] HAGE-FRANSEN M A H,WIEZER M,OTTO A,et al.Pregnancy- and obstetric-related risk factors for urinary incontinence,fecal incontinence,or pelvic organ prolapse later in life:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2021,100(3):373-382.
[4] VERMEULEN C K M,VEEN J,ADANG C,et al.Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy:the POP-UP study[J].Int Urogynecol J,2021,32(4):841-850.
[5] POLLOCK G R,TWISS C O,CHARTIER S,et al.Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography grading with POP-Q staging and Baden-Walker grading in the evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse[J].Abdom Radiol (NY),2021,46(4):1373-1380.
[6] NAM G,LEE S R,KIM S H,et al.Importance of translabial ultrasound for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse and its correlation with the POP-Q examination:analysis of 363 cases[J].J Clin Med,2021,10(18):4267.
[7] 邓舒昊,张渊,施秀荣,等.经会阴超声及POP-Q评分在分娩后盆腔器官脱垂合并压力性尿失禁中的诊断价值研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2021,13(8):43-46.
DENG S H,ZHANG Y,SHI X R,et al.The diagnostic value of perineal ultrasound and POP-Q score in pelvic organ prolapse with stress urinary incontinence after delivery[J].Chin J Fam Planning Gynecotokol,2021,13(8):43-46.
[8] PEDERSEN L,GLAVIND-KRISTENSEN M,BOR P.Clinical relevance of routine transvaginal ultrasound in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse[J].BMC Womens Health,2021,21(1):26.
[9] YUNE Y,JEONG H Y,PARK D H,et al.Three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse:minimal levator hiatus and levator ani deficiency score[J].Ann Coloproctol,2021,37(5):291-297.
[10] MENDES L C,BEZERRA L R P S,BILHAR APM,et al.Symptomatic and anatomic improvement of pelvic organ prolapse in vaginal pessary users[J].Int Urogynecol J,2021,32(4):1023-1029.
[11] VERGHESE T S,MERRIEL A,LEIGHTON L,et al.Willingness of postmenopausal women to participate in a study involving local vaginal oestrogen treatment as an adjunct to pelvic organ prolapse surgery:a qualitative study[J].Int Urogynecol J,2021,32(2):413-421.
[12] LIU L N,LIU X N,LIU C,et al.Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for analyzing the outcomes of pelvic floor surgery for the treatment of anterior compartment prolapse:a comparative study of transvaginal mesh and native-tissue repair[J].Low Urin Tract Symptoms,2021,13(4):456-462.
[13] DAVID M,CATALA L,LEFEBVRE C,et al.The importance of using 3D ultrasound during pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to pre- and post-operative quality of life questionnaires[J].J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod,2020,49(6):101682.
[14] FEI H,LIU Y,LI M,et al.The relationship of severity in diastasis recti abdominis and pelvic floor dysfunction:a retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Womens Health,2021,21(1):68.
[15] BLOMQUIST J L,CARROLL M,MUNOZ A,et al.Pelvic floor muscle strength and the incidence of pelvic floor disorders after vaginal and cesarean delivery[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020,222(1):1-8.
[16] EGOROV V,TAKACS P,SHOBEIRI S A,et al.Predictive value of biomechanical mapping for pelvic organ prolapse surgery[J].Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg,2021,27(1):28-38.
[17] SAMMARCO A G,SHEYN D,HONG C X,et al.Pelvic cross-sectional area at the level of the levator ani and prolapse[J].Int Urogynecol J,2021,32(4):1007-1013.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 莉 赵永新 桂 新.血液流变学变化对脂肪肝的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,1998,15(01):045.
[2]陶玲.超声检查对亚急性甲状腺炎的诊断及随访的临床意义[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(03):210.
[3]黄艳丽,覃小敏,邢 辉. 胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白1检测联合宫颈超声检查在早产预测中的价值 [J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(02):163.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2015.02.019]
[4]李莉,刘梅,张宁.自然流产患者血β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素和超声表现与胚胎染色体异常的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(12):1150.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.12.009]
 LI Li,LIU Mei,ZHANG Ning.Relationship between blood β-human chorionic gonadotropin,ultrasonography and fetal chromosomal abnormalities in patients with spontaneous abortion[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(3):1150.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.12.009]
[5]欧红萍,李 彬,周凤勤.颈动脉超声检查联合血清超敏C 反应蛋白水平检测在冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病诊断中的应用[J].新乡医学院学报,2014,31(10):825.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2014.10.016]
[6]王卫卫,张红伟,崔清洋,等.肺部12分区超声评分法在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(3):252.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.03.011]
 WANG Weiwei,ZHANG Hongwei,CUI Qingyang,et al.Application value of lung 12 zone ultrasound score in evaluating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(3):252.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.03.011]
[7]闫泽雨,单胜华,薛松梅,等.初产妇产褥期延续性护理需求调查研究[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(3):224.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.03.018]
 YAN Ze-yu,SHAN Sheng-hua,XUE Song-mei,et al.Investigation on the puerperium continue care needs in primipara[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(3):224.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.03.018]
[8]赵怡,方红星,刘军苹,等.肺部超声技术对新生儿肺部疾病的鉴别诊断价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2023,40(3):253.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.03.011]
 ZHAO Yi,FANG Hongxing,LIU Junping,et al.Value of pulmonary ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of neonatal pulmonary disease[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2023,40(3):253.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.03.011]
[9]贾震震,魏灿,魏杰,等.经直肠剪切波弹性成像对前列腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2023,40(9):867.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.09.012]
 JIA Zhenzhen,WEI Can,WEI Jie,et al.Differential diagnostic value of shear wave elastography in benign and malignant prostatic lesions[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2023,40(3):867.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.09.012]
[10]曹雅军,吴文春,董敏,等.不同硬膜外麻醉方案对初产妇疼痛和产后盆底功能的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2023,40(12):1146.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.12.009]
 CAO Yajun,WU Wenchun,DONG Min,et al.Effects of different epidural anesthesia regimens on pain and postpartum pelvic floor function of primiparas[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2023,40(3):1146.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.12.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-05