[1]李艳霞,方 惠,樊少磊,等.认知行为干预对妊娠期糖尿病患者生活质量的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(12):1155-1158.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.12.013]
 LI Yan-xia,FANG Hui,FAN Shao-lei,et al.Effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on quality of life of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(12):1155-1158.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.12.013]
点击复制

认知行为干预对妊娠期糖尿病患者生活质量的影响
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
36
期数:
2019年12
页码:
1155-1158
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-12-12

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on quality of life of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus
作者:
李艳霞方 惠樊少磊崔红霞
(郑州大学第三附属医院产科,河南 郑州 450052)
Author(s):
LI Yan-xiaFANG HuiFAN Shao-leiCUI Hong-xia
(Department of Obstetrics,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
认知行为干预妊娠期糖尿病生活质量
Keywords:
cognitive-behavioral therapygestational diabetes mellitusquality of life
分类号:
R733.3
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.12.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨认知行为干预对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者生活质量的影响。方法 采用方便抽样法选择2017年2~11月于郑州大学第三附属医院产科门诊定期产检的GDM患者82例为研究对象,根据干预措施将患者分为观察组(n=41)和对照组(n=41)。2组患者均实施常规孕期保健,在此基础上,观察组患者实施认知行为干预。采用一般资料调查表收集患者的一般资料,分别于干预前、干预后1个月、分娩后24 h采用生活质量量表评估患者的生活质量。结果 干预前2组患者生活质量各维度得分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后1个月,观察组患者总体健康、生理职能、身体疼痛、活力、社会功能、情感职能、精神健康得分高于干预前得分(P<0.05),生理功能得分与干预前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);分娩后24 h,观察组患者生活质量各维度得分均高于干预前(P<0.05)。干预后1个月,对照组患者生活质量各维度得分与干预前比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);分娩后24 h,对照组患者总体健康、生理职能、社会功能得分高于干预前(P<0.05),其余指标与干预前比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后1个月,观察组患者总体健康、生理职能、情感职能、精神健康得分高于对照组(P<0.05),其余指标2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);分娩后24 h,观察组患者各维度得分均高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论 认知行为干预可以提高GDM患者的生活质量。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on quality of life of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.Methods Eighty-two patients with gestational diabetes mellitus who were examined regularly in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were selected by convenient sampling method and divided into observation group(n=41) and control group(n=41).All patients were given routine pregnancy care,based on this,the patients in observation group were given cognitive behavior intervention.The general data of all patients were collected by general questionnaire.The quality of life of all patients were evaluated by quality of life scale before intervention, one month after intervention and 24 hours after delivery.Results There was no significant difference in the scores of each dimension of quality of life between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05).The scores of overall health, physiological function, physical pain, vitality, social function, emotional function and mental health of patients in the observation group at one month after intervention were higher than those before intervention(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the scores of physiological function before intervention and one month after intervention (P>0.05); the scores of all dimensions of quality of life of patients in the observation group at 24 hours after delivery were higher than those before intervention(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the scores of all dimensions of quality of life of patients in the control group at one month after intervention and before intervention(P>0.05); the scores of overall health, physiological function and social function of patients in the control group at 24 hours after delivery were higher than those before intervention(P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the other indicators of patients in the control group at 24 hours after delivery and before intervention (P>0.05).The scores of overall health, physiological function, emotional function and mental health of patients in the observation group were higher than those in the control group at one month after intervention (P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the other indexes between the two groups (P>0.05); the scores of all dimensions of patients in the observation group were higher than those in the control group at 24 hours after delivery(P<0.05).Conclusion Cognitive behavioral therapy can significantly improve the quality of life of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张琳,郑丽,戴晖,等.二甲双胍对妊娠期糖尿病患者新生儿安全性影响的系统评价[J].医药导报,2018,37(9):1119-1126.
[2] CASAGRANDE S S,LINDER B,COWIE C C.Prevalence of gestational diabetes and subsequent type 2 diabetes among US women[J].Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2018,22(141):200-208.
[3] GAO C,SUN X,LU L,et al.Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in mainland China:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Diabetes Investig,2019,10(1): 154-162.
[4] 吉金萍,张元元,王天成,等.妊娠期糖尿病对妊娠结局及新生儿的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(12):1101-1102.
[5] BELLAMY L,CASAS J P,HINGORANI A D,et al.Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Lancet,2009,373 (9677):1773-1779.
[6] GABBE S G,GRAVES C R.Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy[J],Obster Gynecol,2003,102(4):857-868.
[7] FANN J R, BOMBARDIER C H, VANNOY S,et al.Telephone and in-person cognitive behavioral therapy for major depression after traumatic brain injury:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Neurotrauma,2015,32(1):45-57.
[8] SATO D,SUTOH C, SEKI Y,et al.Treatment preferences for internet- based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in Japan:online survey[J].JMIR Form Res,2019,3(2):12635.
[9] WORM-SMEITINK M, JANSE A, VAN DAM A,et al.Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in stepped care for chronic fatigue syndrome:randomized noninferiority trial[J].J Med Internet Res,2019,21(3):11276.
[10] 李会琴,刘云,任利容,等.IADPSG标准诊断妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的胰岛素抵抗及血脂分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(20):3370-3373.
[11] PANTZARTZIS K A,MANOLOPOULOS P P,PASCHOU S A,et al.Gestational diabetes mellitus and quality of life during the third trimester of pregnancy[J].Qual Life Res,2019,28(5):1349-1354.
[12] 国家卫生健康委员会.《关于深入开展“互联网+医疗健康”便民惠民活动的通知》解读[EB/OL].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s10743/201807/bc3cf2fdc18e456aabfdadc9788005c2.shtml.[2018-07-12].
[13] 朱艳侠,洪静芳,周利华,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者健康管理信息技术平台需求分析[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2019,54(1):115-118.
[14] ZAHERI H,NAJAR S,ABBASPOOR Z.Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral stress management on psychological stress and glycemic control in gestational diabetes:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2017,30(11):1378-1382.
[15] 林娜佳.网络互动式连续护理干预对妊娠期糖尿病患者生存质量的影响[D].天津:天津医科大学,2017.

相似文献/References:

[1]惠肖静,张苏河.妊娠期糖尿病患者皮下和网膜脂肪组织中内脏脂肪素的表达及其与胰岛素抵抗的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,2009,26(01):050.
[2]吉金萍,张元元,王天成,等.妊娠期糖尿病对妊娠结局及新生儿的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(12):1101.
[3]张 霞,朱宝菊.规范化管理对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇妊娠结局的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2017,34(7):583.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.07.007]
 ZHANG Xia,ZHU Bao-ju.Impact of standardization management on pregnancy outcome of pregnant woman with gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2017,34(12):583.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.07.007]
[4]袁德丽,周 清,傅晓冬.妊娠期糖尿病患者血清微RNA-372-3p和葡萄糖转运蛋白4水平与胰岛素抵抗的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(5):460.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.05.012]
 YUAN Deli,ZHOU Qing,FU Xiaodong.Relationship between the serum microRNA-372-3p and glucose transporter 4 levels and insulin resistance in patients with gestational diabetes[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(12):460.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.05.012]
[5]张婕,任艳芳.妊娠早期血炎症指标、空腹血糖及血脂对妊娠期糖尿病的联合预测价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2024,(2):163.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2024.02.011]
 ZHANG Jie,REN Yanfang.Combined predictive value of inflammatory indexes,fasting plasma glucose and blood lipid in early pregnancy for gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2024,(12):163.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2024.02.011]
[6]高宇,李子昂,张健,等.不同侧支循环状态下直接取栓与桥接取栓治疗急性前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中疗效及安全性比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2024,(2):169.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2024.02.012]
 GAO Yu,LI Ziang,ZHANG Jian,et al.Comparison of efficacy and safety of direct thrombectomy and bridging thrombectomy in the treatment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke under different collateral circulation statuses[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2024,(12):169.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2024.02.012]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-05