[1]杨继闽.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合Block术治疗女性直肠前突出口梗阻型便秘疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(2):168-171.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.017]
 YANG Ji-min.Effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids combined with Block neoplasty in the treatment of outlet obstructive constipation caused by rectocele in female patients[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(2):168-171.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.017]
点击复制

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合Block术治疗女性直肠前突出口梗阻型便秘疗效观察
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
36
期数:
2019年2
页码:
168-171
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids combined with Block neoplasty in the treatment of outlet obstructive constipation caused by rectocele in female patients
作者:
杨继闽
(濮阳市油田总医院肛肠科,河南 濮阳 457000)
Author(s):
YANG Ji-min
(Department of Anorectal Disease,Puyang Oilfield General Hospital,Puyang 457000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
出口梗阻型便秘直肠前突吻合器痔上黏膜环切术Block术
Keywords:
outlet obstructive constipationrectoceleprocedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidsBlock neoplasty
分类号:
R574.63
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)联合Block术治疗女性直肠前突出口梗阻型便秘(OOC)的临床效果。方法 选择2015年6月至2017年6月濮阳市油田总医院收治的64例直肠前突OOC女性患者为研究对象,根据治疗方法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组32例。对照组患者采用Block术治疗,观察组患者采用PPH联合Block术治疗。记录2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及恢复正常活动时间;2组患者分别于手术前及手术后3、6个月进行便秘Wexner评分及疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分;术后第7天评估患者治疗效果并记录术后并发症发生情况。结果 观察组患者手术时间、恢复正常活动时间及住院时间显著短于对照组,术中出血量显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。术前2组患者便秘Wexner评分及疼痛VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后3、6个月便秘Wexner评分及疼痛VAS评分显著低于术前(P<0.05),2组患者术后6个月便秘Wexner评分及疼痛VAS评分显著低于术后3个月(P<0.05);术后3、6个月时,观察组患者便秘Wexner评分及疼痛VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组患者治疗总有效率分别为75.00%(24/32)、93.75%(30/32),观察组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组(χ2=4.273,P<0.05)。2组患者术后便急感或肛门下坠感、尿潴留、便血、排气性肛门失禁及肛裂发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PPH联合Block术治疗女性直肠前突OOC可有效改善患者便秘症状和肛门疼痛。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate clinical effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) combined with Block neoplasty in the treatment of outlet obstructive constipation(OOC) caused by rectocele in female patients.Methods A total of 64 female patients with OOC caused by rectocele in Puyang Oilfield General Hospital from June 2015 to June 2017 were selected as the subjects.The patients were divided into observation group and control group according to the treatment method,32 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with Block neoplasty,while the patients in the observation group were treated with PPH combined with Block neoplasty.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,hospitalization time and return to normal activity time of the patients in the two groups were recorded.The Wexner score of constipation and visual analogue scales (VAS) score of pain were performed before and 3,6 months after operation in the two groups.The curative effect was evaluated on the 7th day after operation,and the complications were recorded.Results The operation time,return to normal activity time and hospitalization time of the patients in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,and the intraoperative bleeding volume in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in Wexner score of constipation and VAS score of pain between the two groups before operation (P>0.05).The Wexner score of constipation and VAS score of pain at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly lower than those before operation in the two groups (P<0.05).The Wexner score of constipation and VAS score of pain at 6 months after operation were significantly lower than those at 3 months after operation in the two groups (P<0.05).The Wexner score of constipation and VAS score of pain in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 3 and 6 months after operation (P<0.05).The total effective rate in the control group and the observation group was 75.00% (24/32) and 93.75% (30/32),respectively.The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (χ2=4.273,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative anus bearing down,urinary retention,hematochezia,anal exhaust incontinence and anal fissure between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion PPH combined with Block neoplasty in the treatment of OOC caused by rectocele can effectively improve constipation symptoms and anal pain in female patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨新庆.出口梗阻型便秘的外科治疗[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(12):932-935.
[2] 李小成,龚建平,涂经楷.出口梗阻型便秘的治疗进展[J].重庆医学,2018,47(10):1384-1386.
[3] 钱群.出口梗阻型便秘手术治疗风险控制[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(6):413-415.
[4] 尹淑慧,赵克.出口梗阻型便秘的诊治现状[J].临床外科杂志,2018,26(4):262-264.
[5] 邹劲林,彭培建,莫湘琼.经阴道修补和痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突性便秘临床疗效的比较[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(6):995-997,1002.
[6] 黄梅,贾雄,任叔阳,等.PPH术联合穴位注射在直肠前突型便秘治疗中的临床疗效[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2016,11(8):1126-1129.
[7] 中国医师协会肛肠医师分会.便秘外科诊治指南:2017[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(3):241-243.
[8] 高杨.直肠前突修补联合 PPH 术对直肠前突患者预后的改善作用[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(1):9-12.
[9] 黄云.经肛吻合器直肠黏膜切除术与经直肠闭式修补术治疗直肠前突的临床对比[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(4):386-389.
[10] 张忠伟,刘扬,路明.痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(10):774-776.
[11] 梁冲,黄莹莹,朱福清,等.直肠黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突的临床研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(3):295-300.
[12] 王宇光,夏风蓉,刘海东.缝扎直肠瓣结合聚桂醇注射治疗出口梗阻型便秘的效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(18):154-156.
[13] 陈智颖,王朝晖,尹凡.出口梗阻型便秘肛门直肠动力及直肠感知功能的特点[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2017,25(10):764-767,771.
[14] 吴延德.直肠黏膜多点结扎加吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗女性直肠前突合并直肠黏膜内脱垂:附40例报告[J].外科理论与实践,2016,21(6):535-536.
[15] 刘智勇,杨关根,邓群,等.部分吻合器经肛门直肠切除术联合Bresler术治疗直肠前突合并直肠内套叠疗效观察[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(5):566-570.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘勇敢,魏东,高春芳,等.直肠前突28例诊断和治疗[J].新乡医学院学报,1996,13(04):393.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-05