[1]蒋　晖,杜　军,顾纪明,等.腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗老年胃癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(9):770-773.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.09.008]
　JIANG Hui,DU Jun,GU Ji-ming,et al.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(9):770-773.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.09.008]
点击复制

腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗老年胃癌疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2016年9
页码:
770-773
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-08-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer
作者:
蒋　晖; 杜　军; 顾纪明; 高其中; 金留根
（江南大学附属医院无锡市第四人民医院腔镜外科，江苏　无锡　214062）
Author(s):
JIANG Hui; DU Jun; GU Ji-ming; GAO Qi-zhong; JIN Liu-gen
（Department of Endoscopic Surgery,the Fourth People′s Hospital of Wuxi City Affiliated to Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214062,Jiangsu Province,China）
关键词:
胃癌; 腹腔镜; 开腹手术; 根治术
Keywords:
gastric cancer; laparoscopy; open surgery; radical surgery
分类号:
R735.2
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.09.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗老年胃癌的临床疗效。方法　选择2005年3月至2008年3月无锡市第四人民医院收治的老年胃癌患者77例，根据手术方法分为腹腔镜胃癌根治术组（腹腔镜组）36例和开腹胃癌根治术组（开腹组）41例，比较2组患者手术情况、术后恢复情况及术后并发症发生率。随访8 a，比较2组患者复发率和病死率。结果　腹腔镜组患者手术时间长于开腹组（P<0.05)，术中出血量少于开腹组（P<0.05)，切口长度短于开腹组（P<0.05)。腹腔镜组患者肛门排气时间、住院时间显著短于开腹组（P<0.05)，镇痛药使用次数显著少于开腹组（P<0.05)。开腹组和腹腔镜组患者并发症发生率分别为22.0%（9/41）和5.6%（2/36），腹腔镜组患者并发症发生率显著低于开腹组（P<0.05)。开腹组患者4 a复发率和病死率分别为12.2%（5/41）和9.8%（3/41），腹腔镜组患者4 a复发率和病死率分别为8.3%（3/36）和2.8%（1/36），2组患者4 a复发率及病死率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。开腹组患者8 a复发率和病死率分别为34.1%（14/41）和22.0%（9/41），腹腔镜组患者 8 a 复发率和病死率分别为13.9%（5/36）和5.6%（2/36），腹腔镜组患者8 a复发率和病死率显著低于开腹组（P<0.05）。结论　腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗老年胃癌具有创伤小、术后疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率和病死率低等优点。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer.Methods　Seventy-seven patients with gastric cancer were selected in the Fourth People′s Hospital of Wuxi City from March 2005 to March 2008.All the patients were divided into laparoscopic radical gastrectomy group (laparoscope group,36 cases) and open radical gastrectomy group (open group,41 cases) according to the surgical methods.The operation information,postoperative recovery and the rate of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.All the patients were followed up for eight years,and the relapse rate and fatality rate were compared between the two groups.Results　Compared with open group,the operation time was longer(P<0.05),the intraoperative bleeding volume was less(P<0.05),and the length of incision was shorter in laparoscope group(P<0.05).Compared with open group,the anal exhaust time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter(P<0.05),and the number of using analgesic drugs was significantly less in laparoscope group(P<0.05).The rate of complication in open group and laparoscope group was 22.0%(9/41) and 5.6%(2/36) respectively,the rate of complication in laparoscope group was significantly lower than that in open group(P<0.05).The 4-year relapse rate and fatality rate were 12.2%(5/41) and 9.8%(3/41) in open group,and the 4-year relapse rate and fatality rate were 8.3%(3/36) and 2.8%(1/36) in laparoscope group,there was no significant difference in the 4-year relapse rate and fatality rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The 8-year relapse rate and fatality rate were 34.1%(14/41) and 22.0%(9/41) in open group,and the 8-year relapse rate and fatality rate were 13.9%(5/36) and 5.6%(2/36) in laparoscope group,the 8-year relapse rate and fatality rate in laparoscope group were significantly lower than those in open group(P<0.05).Conclusion　Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer has the advantages of less trauma,less postoperative pain,faster recovery,low recurrence rate and fatality rate.

参考文献/References:

［1］　李佑，臧潞，胡伟国，等.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的临床对照研究［J］.中华胃肠外科杂志，2010，13（12）：899-902.
［2］　孙华朋，张娜，廖晓锋，等.70岁以上老年患者腹腔镜胃癌手术安全性的研究［J］.中国内镜杂志，2013，19（12）：1279-1282.
［3］　周敏燕，童莺歌.完全腹腔镜和开腹远端胃癌根治术患者术后疼痛评估的比较［J］.中国实用护理杂志，2013，29（24）：34-35.
［4］　郭峰华，罗奋，茅翔，等.全阻断（隔）胃癌根治术与传统胃癌根治术的比较［J］.复旦学报（医学版），2010，37（1）：103-105，123.
［5］　HAVERKAMP L,WEIJS T J,VANDERSLUIS P C,et al.Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］.Surg Endosc,2013,27(5):1509-1520.
［6］　赵群，李勇，王贵英，等.腹腔镜与开腹手术行胃癌根治术效果的临床对照研究［J］.中国全科医学，2013，16（2）：210-212，215.
［7］　汪勇，覃胜灵，洪强，等.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术术后近期疗效比较［J］.中华医学杂志，2011，91（26）：1834-1836.
［8］　王德臣，袁炯，傅卫，等.腹腔镜胃癌根治术3年随访报告［J］.中国普通外科杂志，2010，19（10）：1053-1056.
［9］　任晖，李明子，季加孚，等.电话随访健康指导对胃癌手术患者快速康复的研究［J］.护理管理杂志，2010，10（5）：377-378.
［10］　桂林，蒋鹏程，张利远，等.腹腔镜辅助下胃癌D2根治的临床研究［J］.重庆医学，2013，42（13）：1522-1524.
［11］　包文中，汤大纬，孟翔凌，等.近端胃癌根治切除术应用效果观察［J］.山东医药，2013，53（12）：34-36.
［12］　KIM H S,KIM B S,LEE I S,et al.Laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with previous gastrectomy for gastric cancer:a report of 17 cases［J］.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2014,24(2):177-182.

相似文献/References:

[1]于成功,萧树东,赵宪邨,等.胃癌胃良性病变患者血清和局部组织中IL—I水平及意义[J].新乡医学院学报,1996,13(03):220.
[2]王淑秀,赵卫星,和瑞芝,等.P~(53)和rasP~(21)在胃癌中表达的免疫组化研究[J].新乡医学院学报,1997,14(02):137.
[3]赵卫星,王淑秀,卢朝晖,等.幽门螺杆菌与胃癌基因抑癌基因突变的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,1997,14(03):203.
[4]王淑秀.抑癌基因和癌基因与胃癌[J].新乡医学院学报,1997,14(01):083.
[5]冯艳玲,乐晓萍,蔡新华.胃癌患者P16和P53蛋白的表达及其相互关系[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(06):403.
[6]周玲生.纤维胃镜粘膜活检1356 例病理分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(06):462.
[7]任金萍,王淑秀,付华民,等.青年与老年人胃癌中PCNA和AgNOR计数表达的对比研究[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(03):156.
[8]贾文英,张合喜,马彦民.幽门螺杆菌感染与胃癌关系的Meta 分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(05):328.
[9]邹心忠.腹腔镜下卵巢良性肿瘤剥除术27例分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(03):212.
[10]周振华,苏国强,张保峰.开腹胆囊切除术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(04):301.
[11]陈赜,陈杰,严想元,等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,,():000.
[12]朱绍辉,侯　栋,薛明辉,等.胃癌腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术中不同食管-空肠吻合口加固方法的疗效及安全性比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(6):533.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.06.007]
　ZHU Shaohui,HOU Dong,XUE Minghui,et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different esophagojejunostom reinforcement methods in laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(9):533.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.06.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-09-05