[1]褚洪生.经乳晕边缘切口乳腺纤维腺瘤切除术中缝闭腺体残腔与保留腺体残腔疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(1):058-60.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.01.017]
　CHU Hong-sheng.Comparison of the effect between closing gland residual cavity and retaining gland residual cavity in the excision of breast fibroadenoma via periareolar incision[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(1):058-60.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.01.017]
点击复制

经乳晕边缘切口乳腺纤维腺瘤切除术中缝闭腺体残腔与保留腺体残腔疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2016年1
页码:
058-60
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between closing gland residual cavity and retaining gland residual cavity in the excision of breast fibroadenoma via periareolar incision
作者:
褚洪生
（玉田县妇幼保健院乳腺外科，河北　玉田　064100）
Author(s):
CHU Hong-sheng
(Department of Breast Surgery，Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Yutian County，Yutian 064100，Hebei Province，China)
关键词:
经乳晕边缘切口; 乳腺纤维腺瘤; 腺体残腔
Keywords:
via periareolar incision; breast fibroadenoma; gland residual cavity
分类号:
R737.9
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.01.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较经乳晕边缘切口乳腺纤维腺瘤切除术中缝闭腺体残腔与保留腺体残腔的临床疗效。方法　选择2011年6月至2013年6月玉田县妇幼保健院收治的乳腺纤维腺瘤患者80例，均给予经乳晕边缘切口乳腺纤维腺瘤切除术治疗，其中40例术中缝闭腺体残腔（缝闭腺体残腔组），40例术中保留腺体残腔（保留腺体残腔组），比较2组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛、切口愈合情况、术后美观度及满意度。结果　缝闭腺体残腔组和保留腺体残腔组患者单个瘤体切除时间分别为（15.31±1.98）、（14.86±2.23）min，2组患者的单个瘤体切除时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；缝闭腺体残腔组和保留腺体残腔组患者切口愈合率分别为100.00%和85.00%，缝闭腺体残腔组患者的切口愈合率显著高于保留腺体残腔组（P<0.05）；缝闭腺体残腔组和保留腺体残腔组患者乳房外形变化率分别为2.50%和17.50%，缝闭腺体残腔组患者的乳房外形变化率显著低于保留腺体残腔组（P<0.05）。2组患者术后第1、2天疼痛评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但术后第3天缝闭腺体残腔组患者的疼痛评分显著低于保留腺体残腔组（P<0.05）。缝闭腺体残腔组和保留腺体残腔组患者满意度分别为97.50%（39/40）和82.50%（33/40），缝闭腺体残腔组患者满意度显著高于保留腺体残腔组（P<0.05）。结论　乳腺纤维腺瘤切除术中缝闭腺体残腔能够有效地减轻患者术后疼痛，有助于切口愈合，且乳腺外形保持较好。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the effect between closing gland residual cavity and retaining gland residual cavity in the excision of breast fibroadenoma via periareolar incision.Methods　Eighty patients with breast fibroadenoma were selected in Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Yutian County from June 2011 to June 2013.All the patients were treated with the excision of breast fibroadenoma via periareolar incision.Among the patients，the gland residual cavities were closed in forty cases(closing residual cavity group)，and the gland residual cavities were retained in the other forty cases(retaining residual cavity group).The operation time，postoperative pain，wound healing，postoperative beauty degree and satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups.Results　The single tumor resection time in closing residual cavity group and retaining residual cavity group was (15.31±1.98) and (14.86±2.23)min respectively，there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The wound healing rate in closing residual cavity group and retaining residual cavity group was 100.00% and 85.00% respectively，the wound healing rate in closing residual cavity group was significantly higher than that in retaining residual cavity group(P<0.05).The breast shape change rate in closing residual cavity group and retaining residual cavity group was 2.50% and 17.50% respectively，the breast shape change rate in closing residual cavity group was significantly lower than that in retaining residual cavity group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the pain score between the two groups on the first and second day after operation(P>0.05).But the pain score of patients in closing residual cavity group was significantly lower than that in retaining residual cavity group on the third day after operation(P<0.05).The satisfaction degree of patients in closing residual cavity group and retaining residual cavity group was 97.50% and 82.50% respectively，which in closing residual cavity group was significantly higher than that in retaining residual cavity group(P<0.05).Conclusion　Closing gland residual cavity in the excision of breast fibroadenoma can effectively relieve the postoperative pain of patients，promote wound healing and keep satisfactory breast shape.

参考文献/References:

［1］　何兆群.乳晕边缘切口在乳腺纤维瘤手术中的应用［J/OL］.中华乳腺病杂志：电子版，2011，5（6）：687-692.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0807.2011.06.005.
［2］　褚洪生.密闭湿性胶原膜敷料对乳腺良性肿物切除术后切口愈合及瘢痕形成的影响［J］.新乡医学院学报，2015，32（10）：947-948.
［3］　方琦.多功能解剖器乳晕缘切口治疗乳腺纤维腺瘤的体会［J］.南京医科大学学报（自然科学版），2011，31（10）：1538-1540.
［4］　李伟平，杨海峰，阳宇.乳腺纤维瘤病12例临床病理学观察［J］.临床与实验病理学杂志，2012，28（7）：800-802
［5］　吴晓辉，王莉芬，张莉，等.乳腺纤维瘤病样化生性癌临床病理观察［J］.诊断病理学杂志，2013，20（11）：698-701.
［6］　杨炜，冉立峰，周崑，等.聚焦超声消融乳腺纤维瘤治疗中声场对乳腺增生的作用［J］.重庆医科大学学报，2013，38（1）：61-63.
［7］　马立公，刘锦龙，王伟，等.乳腺恶性叶状肿瘤1例［J］.实用放射学杂志，2011，27（8）：1295-1296.
［8］　周志浩，张亚男.经乳晕缘切口乳腺良性肿瘤切除术的临床评价［J］.中国普通外科杂志，2009，18（11）：1195-1198.
［9］　马银斌，王彦铭，李伟，等.乳晕边缘切口及压力封闭残腔技术在乳腺良性肿块切除术中的应用［J］.重庆医学，2013，42（33）：4046-4047.
［10］　张浩，周文斌，周茜，等.环乳晕切口在乳腺癌保乳手术中的应用［J］.中华实验外科杂志，2013，30（2）：383-385.
［11］　唐蓉，欧阳立志.治疗性保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳房切除术的肿瘤学安全性［J］.中华外科杂志，2013，51（1）：80-82.

相似文献/References:

[1]张亚珍.安珂微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性病变疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(10):931.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.10.021]
　ZHANG Ya-zhen.Effect of EnCor minimally invasive system resection for benign breast lesion[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(1):931.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.10.021]

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-05