[1]王卫华,杨红军,王尚柯,等.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(2):182-186.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017]
　WANG Weihua,YANG Hongjun,WANG Shangke,et al.Comparison of the application effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(2):182-186.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017]
点击复制

超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用效果比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
39
期数:
2022年2
页码:
182-186
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the application effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic myomectomy
作者:
王卫华; 杨红军; 王尚柯; 茹六合; 郑小虎
（焦作市妇幼保健院麻醉科，河南　焦作　454000）
Author(s):
WANG Weihua; YANG Hongjun; WANG Shangke; RU Liuhe; ZHENG Xiaohu
(Department of Anesthesiology,Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jiaozuo City,Jiaozuo 454000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
子宫肌瘤; 子宫肌瘤剔除术; 腹腔镜手术; 腹横肌平面阻滞; 腰方肌阻滞
Keywords:
hysteromyoma; myomectomy; laparoscopic surgery; transversus abdominis plane block; quadratus lumborum block
分类号:
R737.33
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞（TAPB）与腰方肌阻滞（QLB）在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用效果。方法　选择2019年12月至2020年12月焦作市妇幼保健院收治的98例子宫肌瘤患者为研究对象，所有患者行腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术，根据麻醉方法将患者分为TAPB组和QLB组，每组49例。TAPB组患者给予超声引导下TAPB，QLB组患者给予超声引导下QLB，然后均实施全身麻醉。记录2组患者麻醉前（T0）、切皮时（T1）、肌瘤剔除时（T2）及术毕时（T3）的心率（HR）和平均动脉压（MAP）；观察2组患者的苏醒质量，包括气管插管拔出时间、呼之睁眼时间、恢复室停留时间，并统计术后24 h内患者自控静脉镇痛（PCIA）次数；术后6、12、24 h，采用视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评估患者疼痛程度，采用Ramsay评分评估患者镇静程度；观察2组患者不良反应发生情况。结果　2组患者T1、T2时HR、MAP显著高于T0时（P<0.05），T3时HR、MAP显著低于T1、T2时（P<0.05），T3与T0时HR、MAP比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；T0、T1、T2、T3时2组患者HR、MAP比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。QLB组患者呼之睁眼时间、气管插管拔出时间、恢复室停留时间显著短于TAPB组，术后24 h内PCIA次数显著少于TAPB组（P<0.05）。2组患者术后12、24 h时VAS评分显著高于术后6 h时（P<0.05），2组患者术后24 h时VAS评分显著高于术后12 h时（P<0.05）；术后6、12、24 h时，QLB组患者VAS评分显著低于TAPB组（P<0.05）。2组患者术后24 h时Ranmsay评分显著高于术后6、12 h（P<0.05），2组患者术后12 h时Ranmsay评分与术后6 h时比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；术后6、12、24 h时2组患者Ranmsay评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。TAPB组和QLB组患者不良反应发生率分别为10.20%（5/49）、6.12%（3/49），2组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.136，P>0.05）。结论　超声引导下TAPB、QLB均可维持腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术患者的血流动力学稳定，且镇静效果较好。相比超声引导下TAPB，超声引导下QLB的镇痛效果更好，可有效减少PCIA次数，提高患者术后苏醒质量。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the application effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in laparoscopic myomectomy.Methods　A total of 98 patients with uterine fibroids admitted to the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jiaozuo City from December 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects,all patients underwent laparoscopic myomectomy,and the patients were divided into TAPB group and QLB group according to the anesthesia method,with 49 cases in each group.The patients in the TAPB group were given ultrasound-guided TAPB,and the patients in the QLB group were given ultrasound-guided QLB,and then all patients received general anesthesia.The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of patients in the two groups were recorded at the time points of before anesthesia (T0),skin incision (T1),during myomectomy (T2) and the end of operation (T3).The quality of recovery of patients in the two groups was observed,including the extubation time,eye opening time,and recovery room residence time;and the number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) within 24 hours after operation was counted.At 6,12 and 24 hours after operation,the degree of pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS),and the degree of sedation was evaluated by Ramsay score.The adverse reactions of patients in the two groups were observed.Results　The HR and MAP at T1 and T2 in the two groups were significantly higher than those at T0 (P<0.05),the HR and MAP at T3 were significantly lower than those at T1 and T2 (P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in HR and MAP between T3 and T0 (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in HR and MAP between the two groups at T0,T1,T2 and T3 (P>0.05).The extubation time,eye opening time and recovery room residence time of patients in the QLB group were significantly shorter than those in the TAPB group,and the number of PCIA within 24 hours after operation was significantly less than that in the TAPB group (P<0.05).The VAS score at 12 and 24 hours after operation in both groups were significantly higher than those at 6 hours after operation (P<0.05).The VAS score at 24 hours after operation in both groups were significantly higher than those at 12 hours after operation (P<0.05).The VAS score of patients in the QLB group was significantly lower than that in the TAPB group at 6,12,and 24 hours after operation (P<0.05).The Ranmsay score at 24 hours after surgery in the two groups was significantly higher than that at 6 and 12 hours after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the Ranmsay score between 12 hours and 6 hours after operation in the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the Ranmsay score between the two groups at 6,12 and 24 hours after operation (P>0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the TAPB group and QLB group was 10.20%(5/49) and 6.12%(3/49),respectively.There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (χ2=0.136,P>0.05).Conclusion　Ultrasound-guided TAPB and QLB can both maintain hemodynamic stability in patients with laparoscopic myomectomy,and have better sedation effect.Compared with ultrasound-guided TAPB,ultrasound-guided QLB has better analgesic effect,can effectively reduce the number of PCIA,and improve the quality of patients′ postoperative recovery.

参考文献/References:

［1］　陈述琼，蒋凤梅.子宫肌瘤剔除术对卵巢功能、血清疼痛指标水平的影响及临床疗效分析［J］.中国妇幼保健，2018，33（16）：3619-3623.
CHEN S Q,JIANG F M.Analysis on influence of myomectomy on ovarian function and levels of serum pain indexes and the clinical curative effect［J］.Matern Child Health Care Chin,2018,33(16):3619-3623.
［2］　乔克坤，李向，向志雄.超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合全身麻醉对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中血流动力学及镇痛效果的影响［J］.广西医科大学学报，2020，37（4）：751-755.
QIAO K K,LI X,XIANG Z X.Effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus psoas block combined with general anesthesia on hemodynamics and analgesic effect during laparoscopic myomectomy［J］.J Guangxi Med Univ,2020,37(4):751-755.
［3］　TORGESON M,KILENY J,PFEIFER C,et al.Conventional epidural vs transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine:a randomized trial in colorectal surgery［J］.J Am Coll Surg,2018,227(1):78-83.
［4］　任柏林，冯爱敏，乔迎帅，等.腰方肌与腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜手术中的镇痛效果比较［J］.新乡医学院学报，2018，35（8）：719-721.
REN B L,FENG A M,QIAO Y S,et al.Comparison of analgesic effects of plane block of psoas quadratus muscle and transverse abdominal muscle in laparoscopic surgery［J］.J Xinxiang Med Univ,2018,35(8):719-721.
［5］　ELSHARKAWY H,EL-BOGHDADLY K,BARRINGTON M.Quadratus lumborum block:anatomical concepts,mechanisms,and techniques［J］.Anesthesiology,2019,130(2):322-335.
［6］　子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识专家组.子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识［J］.中华妇产科杂志，2017，52（12）：793-800.
EXPERT GROUP OF CHINA EXPERT CONSENSUS ON DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS.China consensus on diagnosis and treatment of uterine fibroids［J］.Chin J Obstet Gynecol,2017,52(12):793-800.
［7］　DAABISS M.American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification［J］.Indian J Anaesth,2011,55(2):111-115.
［8］　孙兵，车晓明.视觉模拟评分法（VAS）［J］.中华神经外科杂志，2012，28（6）：645.
SUN B,CHE X M.Visual analogue scales (VAS)［J］.Chin J Neurosurg,2012,28(6):645.
［9］　李永华，施春波，厉为良.电子支气管镜检查镇静中Ramsay评分的信度和效度［J］.中华实用诊断与治疗杂志，2013，27（10）：1000-1001.
LI Y H,SHI C B,LI W L.Reliability and validity of Ramsay score in electronic bronchoscopy sedation［J］.J Chin Pract Diag Ther,2013,27(10):1000-1001.
［10］　丁雷鸣，李军，郑珍慧，等.七氟醚复合瑞芬太尼对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术患者应激反应、血流动力学及认知功能的影响［J］.中国医刊，2018，53（6）：646-649.
DING L M,LI J,ZHENG Z H,et al.Influence of sevoflurane and remifentanil on stress response,hemodynamics and cognitive function in patients with laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy［J］.Chin J Med,2018,53(6):646-649.
［11］　薛华，张建国.氯胺酮复合瑞芬太尼对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术患者血流动力学稳定性及术后并发症的影响［J］.中国性科学，2020，29（1）：82-85.
XUE H,ZHANG J G.Effects of ketamine combined with remifentanil on hemodynamic stability and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy［J］.Chin J Hum Sexual,2020,29(1):82-85.
［12］　蔡朦朦，葛建林，缪娟娟，等.腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后镇痛中的比较［J］.国际麻醉学与复苏杂志，2020，41（7）：663-667.
CAI M M,GE J L,MIAO J J,et al.Comparison of quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer［J］.Int J Anesth Resus,2020,41(7):663-667.
［13］　BLANCO R,ANSARI T,GIRGIS E.Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section:a randomised controlled trial［J］.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2015,32(11):812-818.
［14］　TOKER M K,ALTIPARMAK B,UYSAL A,et al.The analgesic efficacy of oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block after laparoscopic hysterectomy:a randomized,controlled,observer-blinded study［J］.Medicine(Baltimore),2019,98(1):e13994.
［15］　MIESZKOWSKI M M,MAYZNER-ZAWADZKA E,TUYAKOV B,et al.Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Quadratus Lumborum Block type Ⅰ using ropivacaine in postoperative analgesia after a cesarean section:a controlled clinical study［J］.Ginekol Pol,2018,89(2):89-96.
［16］　RUIZ-TOVAR J,GARCIA A,FERRIGNI C,et al.Laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program:a prospective randomized clinical trial［J］.Obes Surg,2018,28(11):3374-3379.
［17］　张隆盛，卢燕，张楷弘，等.腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞应用于妇科腹腔镜术后镇痛效果的比较［J］.河北医科大学学报，2020，41（12）：1450-1454.
ZHANG L S,LU Y,ZHANG K H,et al.Comparison of the analgesic effect of quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in gynecological laparoscopic surgery［J］.J Hebei Med Univ,2020,41(12):1450-1454.
［18］　HUSSAIN N,BRULL R,WEAVER T,et al.Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of quadratus lumborum block for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia［J］.Anesthesiology,2021,134(1):72-87.
［19］　PRZKORA R,MCGRADY W,VASILOPOULOS T,et al.Evaluation of the head-mounted display for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks in simulated regional anesthesia［J］.Pain Med,2015,16(11):2192-2194.
［20］　ANDERSEN E B,TANGGAARD K,NIELSEN M V,et al.Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block catheter technique［J］.Anaesthesia,2020,75(3):412-413.

相似文献/References:

[1]周玲生.子宫腺肌病178例临床病理分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(05):363.
[2]张淑爱.多疗程米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤42例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(05):380.
[3]张淑爱.多疗程米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤42 例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(05):380.
[4]史沛,胡宗杰,茹凤娟.症状性子宫肌瘤动脉栓塞术的疗效观察 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(02):183.
[5]冯晓萍,万淑琼.K i-67、雌激素受体及孕激素受体在子宫肌瘤中的表达[J].新乡医学院学报,2014,31(11):957.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2014.11.027]
[6]刘秋瑾,张　凯,刘红杰,等.不同血栓风险评估模型预测经宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除患者术后深静脉血栓形成的临床价值比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(1):019.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.01.005]
　LIU Qiujin,ZHANG Kai,LIU Hongjie,et al.Comparison of the clinical value of different thrombus risk assessment models in predicting deep vein thrombosis of patients after transcervical resection of myoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(2):019.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.01.005]
[7]董　燕,杨英艺,龙泳伶.高强度聚焦超声联合四黄水蜜外敷治疗子宫肌瘤疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(3):250.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.011]
　DONG Yan,YANG Ying-yi,LONG Yong-ling.Clinical effect of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with external application of Sihuang shuimi in the treatment of uterine fibroids[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(2):250.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.011]
[8]买　茹.舒适护理对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除患者术后疼痛及生活质量的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(9):824.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.09.019]
　MAI Ru.Effect of comfort nursing on postoperative pain and quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(2):824.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.09.019]
[9]朱　蓉.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(12):1094.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.12.012]
　ZHU Rong.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy and abdominal hysteromyomectomy in the treatment of hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(2):1094.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.12.012]
[10]王　波.血清基质金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂-1、胰岛素样生长因子-1和表皮生长因子水平检测在子宫肌瘤诊断中的价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(12):1098.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.022]
　WANG Bo.Value of serum tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1,insulin like growth factor-1 and epidermal growth factor in the diagnosis of uterus myoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(2):1098.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.022]
[11]关新垒,华彩红,王世进,等.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(3):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
　GUAN Xinlei,HUA Caihong,WANG Shijin,et al.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(2):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-05