[1]牛小育,黄广振,黄遂柱.放散式冲击波与局部药物注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2021,38(9):880-883.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.09.017]
　NIU Xiaoyu,HUANG Guangzhen,HUANG Suizhu.Comparison of curative effect between radial shock wave and local drug injection in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2021,38(9):880-883.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.09.017]
点击复制

放散式冲击波与局部药物注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年9
页码:
880-883
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of curative effect between radial shock wave and local drug injection in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis
作者:
牛小育; 黄广振; 黄遂柱
（郑州颐和医院关节与运动医学外科，河南　郑州　450047）
Author(s):
NIU Xiaoyu; HUANG Guangzhen; HUANG Suizhu
（Department of Joint and Sports Medicine Surgery,Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital,Zhengzhou 450047,Henan Province,China）
关键词:
足底筋膜炎; 冲击波治疗; 局部药物注射
Keywords:
plantar fasciitisshock wave treatmentlocal drug injection
分类号:
R686.3
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.09.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较放散式冲击波与局部药物注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床疗效。方法　选择2018年1月至2019年6月郑州颐和医院收治的65例慢性足底筋膜炎患者为研究对象，按照治疗方法将患者分为观察组（n=35）和对照组（n=30）。2组患者均给予穿平底鞋、减少负重及主动锻炼等常规干预措施，对照组患者在常规干预措施基础上给予醋酸曲安奈德和盐酸利多卡因局部注射治疗，每周1次，共治疗2次；观察组患者在常规干预措施基础上给予放散式冲击波治疗，每周1次，共治疗4次。对2组患者治疗前及治疗后第8、15、22、90天的足踝部疼痛的视觉模拟评分（VAS）和足踝功能的美国足踝外科学会（AOFAS）评分进行比较，治疗后第90天评估2组患者临床疗效。结果　治疗前2组患者VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），2组患者治疗后第8、15、22、90天VAS评分均显著低于治疗前（P＜0.05）；治疗后第8天观察组患者VAS评分显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗后第22、90天观察组患者VAS评分显著低于对照组（P＜0.05）。治疗前2组患者AOFAS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），2组患者治疗后第8、15、22、90天AOFAS评分均显著高于治疗前（P＜0.05）；治疗后第8天观察组患者AOFAS评分显著低于对照组（P＜0.05）； 2组患者治疗后第15天AOFAS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；治疗后第22、90天观察组患者AOFAS评分显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）。观察组和对照组患者治疗总有效率分别为94.29%（33/35）、76.67%（23/30），观察组患者治疗总有效率显著高于对照组（χ2=4.204，P＜0.05）。结论　放散式冲击波治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的近期疗效弱于局部药物注射治疗，但远期疗效优于局部药物注射治疗，其可有效缓解慢性足底筋膜炎患者的疼痛症状，改善足踝功能。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect of radial shock wave and local drug injection in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis.Methods　Sixty-five patients with chronic plantar fasciitis treated in Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital from January 2018 to June 2019 were selected as the research subjects,and the patients were divided into observation group (n=35) and control group (n=30) according to the treatment method.The patients in the both groups were given routine intervention measures such as wearing flat shoes,reducing weight-bearing and active exercise.On the basis of routine intervention measures,the patients in the control group were treated with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide acetate and lidocaine hydrochloride once a week for a total of two times,while the patients in the observation group were treated with radial shock wave once a week for a total of four times.The visual analogue scale (VAS) of foot and ankle pain and the American Society of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) score of foot and ankle function were compared between the two groups before treatment and on the 8th,15th,22nd and 90th days after treatment.The clinical efficacy of the patients in the two groups was evaluated on the 90th day after treatment.Results　There was no significant difference in the VAS score between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05).The VAS score on the 8th,15th,22nd and 90th days after treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05).The VAS score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group on the 8th day after treatment (P<0.05).The VAS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group on the 22nd and 90th days after treatment (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in AOFAS score between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05).The AOFAS score on the 8th,15th,22nd and 90th days after treatment were significantly higher than that before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05).The AOFAS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group on the 8th day after treatment (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in AOFAS score between the two groups on the 15th day after treatment (P>0.05).The AOFAS score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group on the 22nd and 90th days after treatment (P<0.05).The total effective rate in the observation group and the control group was 94.29% (33/35) and 76.67% (23/30),respectively.The total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(χ2=4.204,P＜0.05).Conclusion　The short-term effect of radial shock wave is weaker than that of local drug injection in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis,but the long-term effect is better than that of local drug injection.The radial shock wave can effectively relieve the pain symptoms and improve the foot and ankle function of patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.

参考文献/References:

［1］　TROJIAN T,TUCKER A K.Plantar fasciitis［J］.Am Fam Physician,2019,99(12):744-750.
［2］　CAREK P J,EDENFIELD K M,MICHAUDET C,et al.Foot and ankle conditions:plantar fasciitis［J］.FP Essent,2018,465:11-17.
［3］　方健辉，李国新，张文，等.聚焦式体外冲击波治疗运动员慢性足底筋膜炎疗效观察［J］.中国运动医学杂志，2013，32（1）：62-63.
［4］　SCHMITZ C,CSASZAR N B,MILZ S,et al.Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions:a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database［J］.Br Med Bull,2015,116(1):115-138.
［5］　中华医学会物理医学与康复学分会，肌肉骨骼疾病体外冲击波治疗专家共识组.肌肉骨骼疾病体外冲击波治疗专家共识［J］.中华物理医学与康复杂志，2019，41（7）：481-487.
［6］　杨军，史展，邢更彦.体外冲击波疗法治疗肌肉骨骼系统疾病研究的相关进展［J］.中国医学前沿杂志：电子版，2014，6（1）：34-39.
［7］　贝尔，迈赫仑.运动损伤临床指南［M］.高崇玄，译.北京：人民体育出版社，2019：7.
［8］　HUSKISSON E C.Measurement of pain［J］.Lancet,1974,2(7889):1127-1131.
［9］　颜世昌，王鑫强，成婷婷，等.发散式体外冲击波与传统方式治疗跖筋膜炎的效果比较［J］.中国医药导报，2018，15（27）：66-69.
［10］　王俊华，徐远红，王刚，等.体外冲击波联合电针治疗慢性足底筋膜炎［J］.中国康复，2012，27（3）：191-193.
［11］　严文广，孙绍丹，李旭红.体外冲击波联合矫形鞋垫治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效观察［J］.中南大学学报（医学版），2014，39（12）：1326-1330.
［12］　李志云，倪喆，邵增务.足底筋膜炎治疗的进展［J］.中华物理医学与康复杂志，2012，34（9）：702-704.
［13］　张鹏，俞光荣.足底跖腱膜炎的研究现状［J］.中国矫形外科杂志，2013，21（23）：2375-2378.
［14］　李延红，石耀武，张宏蕾.活络止痛软膏联合体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎62例［J］.西部中医药，2016，29（7）：105-107.
［15］　杨衡，孔长旺，黄俊琪，等.体外冲击波治疗跖筋膜炎的临床疗效观察［J］.华南国防医学杂志，2019，33（2）：104-106.
［16］　AL-BOLOUSHI Z,LOPEZ-ROYO M P,ARIAN M,et al.Minimally invasive non-surgical management of plantar fasciitis:a systematic review［J］.J Bodyw Mov Ther,2019,23(1):122-137.
［17］　刘春龙，张志杰，余瑾，等.体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的临床疗效分析［J］.中国康复医学杂志，2012，27（4）：372-373.
［18］　LEE H S,CHOI Y R,KIM S W,et al.Risk factors affecting chronic rupture of the plantar fascia［J］.2014,35（3）：258-263.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-05