[1]马　奎,张圣帮,郭西良.不同时间窗经额血肿穿刺引流高血压脑出血患者预后比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2021,38(8):762-765.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.08.013]
　MA Kui,ZHANG Shengbang,GUO Xiliang.Comparison of the prognosis of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage underwent transfrontal puncture and drainage at different time windows[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2021,38(8):762-765.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.08.013]
点击复制

不同时间窗经额血肿穿刺引流高血压脑出血患者预后比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年8
页码:
762-765
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the prognosis of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage underwent transfrontal puncture and drainage at different time windows
作者:
马　奎; 张圣帮; 郭西良
（安徽省第二人民医院神经外科，安徽　合肥　230041）
Author(s):
MA Kui; ZHANG Shengbang; GUO Xiliang
(Department of Nurosurgery,Anhui No.2 Provincial People′s Hospital,Hefei 230041,Anhui Province,China)
关键词:
高血压脑出血; 经额血肿穿刺引流术; 手术时机
Keywords:
hypertensive cerebral hemorrhagetransfrontal puncture and drainageoperative timing
分类号:
R651.1+2
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.08.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较不同时间窗经额血肿穿刺引流高血压脑出血（HCH）患者的预后。方法　选择2017年1月至2019年12月安徽省第二人民医院收治的63例HCH患者为研究对象，所有患者行体位辅助经额血肿穿刺引流术，根据发病至穿刺术的时间将患者分为超早期手术组25例（脑出血时间≤6 h）、早期手术组28例（脑出血时间＞6～24 h）和延迟手术组10例（脑出血时间＞24 h）。比较3组患者术后1周内再出血率、病死率和并发症发生率；分别于术前和术后2周对3组患者进行格拉斯哥预后评分（GOS），术后3个月时采用Barthel指数评估患者日常生活活动（ADL）能力。结果　术后1周内，超早期手术组患者再出血率、并发症发生率和病死率分别为8.00%（2/25）、4.00%（1/25）、4.00%（1/25），早期手术组患者再出血率、并发症发生率和病死率分别为7.14%（2/28）、25.00%（7/28）、17.86%（5/28），延期手术组患者再出血率、并发症发生率和病死率分别为10.00%（1/10）、30.00%（3/10）、30.00%（3/10）；3组患者术后1周内再出血率比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），超早期手术组患者并发症发生率、病死率显著低于早期手术组和延迟手术组（P＜0.05），早期手术组与延迟手术组患者并发症发生率、病死率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术前3组患者GOS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），3组患者术后2周时GOS评分均显著高于术前（P＜0.05）；术后2周，超早期手术组和早期手术组患者GOS评分显著高于延迟手术组（P＜0.05），超早期手术组患者GOS评分显著高于早期手术组（P＜0.05）。超早期手术组、早期手术组和延迟手术组患者术后3个月时ADL评分分别为（73.5±2.2）、（65.4±3.6）、（63.7±3.3）分；超早期手术组患者ADL评分显著高于早期手术组和延迟手术组（P＜0.05），早期手术组与延迟手术组患者ADL评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论　超早期经额血肿穿刺引可以显著降低HCH患者的并发症发生率和病死率，改善患者预后，提高患者的生活自理能力。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the prognosis of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage (HCH) underwent transfrontal puncture and drainage at different time windows.Methods　Sixty-three patients with HCH treated in Anhui No.2 Provincial People′s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were selected as the research subjects.All patients underwent transfrontal puncture and drainage,and the patients were divided into super-early operation group (cerebral hemorrhage time ≤ 6 h,n=25),early operation group (cerebral hemorrhage time > 6-24 h,n=28) and delayed operation group (cerebral hemorrhage time > 24 h,n=10) according to the time from onset to puncture.The rebleeding rate,fatality rate and the incidence of complications within one week after operation were compared among the three groups.The patients were performed with Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) before and two weeks after operation.The activity of daily living (ADL) of patients was evaluated by Barthel index at 3 months after operation.Results　Within one week after operation,the rebleeding rate,the incidence of complications and fatality rate in the super-early operation group were 8.00% (2/25),4.00% (1/25) and 4.00% (1/25),respectivelyand they were 7.14% (2/28),25.00% (7/28) and 17.86% (5/28) respectively in the early operation groupwhile they were 10.00% (1/10),30.00% (3/10) and 30.00% (3/10) respectively in the delayed operation group.There was no significant difference in the rebleeding rate within one week after operation among the three groups (P＞0.05).The incidence of complications and fatality rate in the super-early operation group were significantly lower than those in the early operation group and the delayed operation group (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and fatality rate between the early operation group and the delayed operation group (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in GOS score among the three groups before operation (P＞0.05).The GOS score at two weeks after operation was significantly higher than that before operation in the three groups (P<0.05).At two weeks after operation,the GOS score of patients in the super-early operation group and early operation group was significantly higher than that in the delayed operation group (P<0.05),and the GOS score of patients in the super-early operation group was significantly higher than that in the early operation group (P<0.05).The ADL score at three months after operation in the super-early operation group,early operation group and delayed operation group was 73.5±2.2,65.4±3.6 and 63.7±3.3,respectively.The ADL score of patients in the super-early operation group was significantly higher than that in the early operation group and delayed operation group (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in ADL score between the early operation group and delayed operation group (P＞0.05).Conclusion　Super-early transfrontal puncture and drainage can significantly reduce the incidence of complications and fatality rate in patients with HCH,improve the prognosis,and raise the self-care ability of patients.

参考文献/References:

［1］　周良辅，庞力.高血压脑出血的微侵袭手术治疗：前瞻随机多中心研究［J］.中国临床神经科学，2001，9（2）：151-154.
［2］　中华医学会神经外科学分会，中国医师协会急诊医师分会，中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组，等.高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南［J］.中华神经外科杂志，2020，36（8）：757-770.
［3］　李浩，刘明.微创置管吸引术对高血压脑出血的疗效分析［J］.中国卫生标准管理，2020，11（6）：74-76.
［4］　闫红光，吕书萍.微创血肿清除术治疗脑出血时再出血原因分析［J］.新乡医学院学报，2003，20（3）：205-206.
［5］　董宇为，刘小印，王喆，等.经额定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效及安全性［J］．新乡医学院学报，2018，35（8）：708-711.
［6］　谢建民.高血压脑出血不同手术时间疗效对比及对患者生活质量影响分析［J］.黑龙江医学，2020，44（4）：459-461.
［7］　王永会.浅析在不同时机对重症高血压脑出血患者进行手术治疗的效果［J］.当代医药论丛，2018，16（17）：43-44.
［8］　许进志，严周，耿飞，等.不同手术时机软通道微创手术治疗高血压脑出血的对比分析［J］.甘肃医药，2018，37（8）：719-720，728.
［9］　孔灵通，陈国运.不同时机小骨窗显微手术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效比较［J］.中国现代药物应用，2018，12（7）：29-30.
［10］　冯裕修，李友健.改良立体定向软通道微创脑内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床研究［J］.微创医学，2018，13（5）：681-682，695.
［11］　门旭乔.立体定向软通道微创血肿穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果［J］.河南外科学杂志，2020，26（2）：90-91.
［12］　温玉东，黄振山，张永明，等.不同手术方式治疗高血压性脑出血的疗效分析比较及术后再出血影响因素分析［J］.中华神经创伤外科电子杂志，2019，5（5）：269-275.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2019.05.004.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘彦丽,赵丽,孙新荣.微创术治疗高血压脑出血的病情观察与护理[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(02):151.
[2]唐秀纯,左右.微创外科治疗高血压脑出血的观察与护理[J].新乡医学院学报,2009,26(04):418.
[3]胡怡勇,邓文娟,邓丽娟.早期微创穿刺碎吸引流术治疗中小量基底核区高血压性脑出血疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(9):798.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.09.017]
　HU Yi-yong,DENG Wen-juan,DENG Li-juan.Effect of minimally invasive puncture and drainage in treatment of early middle and small hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in basal nucleus[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(8):798.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.09.017]
[4]董宇为,刘小印,王　喆,等.经额定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效及安全性[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(8):708.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.015]
　DONG Yu-wei,LIU Xiao-yin,WANG Zhe,et al.Effect and safety of transfrontal stereotactic puncture and drainage in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia region[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(8):708.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.015]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-05