[1]沙宝学,罗 涛,周威力.微创同切口通道下减压术治疗伴有神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(12):1143-1146.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.12.009]
 SHA Baoxue,LUO Tao,ZHOU Weili.Effect of minimally invasive decompression through the same incision in the treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures and nerve injury[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(12):1143-1146.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.12.009]
点击复制

微创同切口通道下减压术治疗伴有神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折疗效观察
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年12
页码:
1143-1146
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of minimally invasive decompression through the same incision in the treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures and nerve injury
作者:
沙宝学罗 涛周威力
(上海市公共卫生临床中心骨科,上海 201500)
Author(s):
SHA BaoxueLUO TaoZHOU Weili
(Department of Orthopaedics,Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center,Shanghai 201500,China)
关键词:
胸腰椎骨折神经损伤微创手术椎管减压术
Keywords:
thoracolumbar fracturenerve injuryminimally invasive surgeryspinal canal decompression
分类号:
R683.2
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.12.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨微创同切口通道下减压术治疗伴有神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折的临床效果。方法 选择2016年10月至2019年3月上海市公共卫生临床中心收治的96例伴有神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折患者为研究对象,根据手术方式分为观察组(n=56)和对照组(n=40),对照组患者采取开放性椎管减压术治疗,观察组患者采取微创同切口通道下减压术治疗。记录患者术中出血量、肌肉剥离长度、手术时间、术后引流量及住院时间;术前、术后6个月,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者疼痛情况;术前、术后1周和术后6个月,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分评估患者脊柱功能;分别于术前和术后1周采用胸腰椎正侧位X线片测量伤椎椎体前、后缘相对高度及后凸Cobb角;观察患者术后1个月内并发症发生情况,术后6个月评估2组患者临床疗效。结果 2组患者的手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与对照组比较,观察组患者的术中出血量、术后引流量少,肌肉剥离长度小,住院时间短(P<0.05)。2组患者术前VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2组患者术后6个月VAS评分均显著低于术前(P<0.05);术后6个月,观察组患者VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者术前ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后1周、术后6个月ODI评分显著低于术前,术后6个月ODI评分显著低于术后1周(P<0.05);术后1周和6个月,观察组患者ODI评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者术前椎体前、后缘相对高度及Cobb角比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与术前比较,2组患者术后1周椎体前、后缘相对高度增大,Cobb角减小(P<0.05);术后1周,观察组患者椎体前、后缘相对高度显著大于对照组,Cobb角显著小于对照组(P<0.05)。术后6个月,观察组和对照组患者总有效率分别为98.2%(55/56)、87.50%(35/40),观察组患者总有效率高于对照组(χ2=4.571,P<0.05)。术后1个月内,观察组和对照组患者并发症发生率分别为7.1%(4/56)、12.5%(5/40),观察组患者并发症发生率显著低于对照组(χ2=4.216,P<0.05)。结论 微创同切口通道下减压术治疗伴有神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折疗效肯定,且创伤小,患者恢复快,术后并发症少。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical effect of minimally invasive decompression through the same incision in the treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures and nerve injury.Methods Ninety-six patients with thoracolumbar fractures and nerve injury admitted to Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from October 2016 to March 2019 were selected as the research subjects,and the patients were divided into observation group (n=56) and control group (n=40) according to the operation method.The patients in the control group were treated with open spinal canal decompression,while the patients in the observation group were treated with minimally invasive decompression through the same incision.The intraoperative blood loss,muscle dissection length,operation time,postoperative drainage volume and hospitalization time were recorded.The pain of the patients was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) before and six months after operation.The spinal function was evaluated by Oswestry disability index (ODI) score at the time points of before operation,one week and six months after operation.The relative height of anterior and posterior margin of injured vertebrae and Cobb angle were measured by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of thoracolumbar spine before and one week after operation.The incidence of complications was observed within one month after operation,and the clinical effect of the patients in the two groups was evaluated at six months after operation.Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P>0.05).Compared with the control group,the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were less,the length of muscle dissection was small,and the hospitalization time was shorter in the observation group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the VAS score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05).The VAS scores at six months after operation were significantly lower than those before operation in the two groups (P<0.05).The VAS score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group at six months after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the ODI score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05).The ODI scores at one week and six months after operation were significantly lower than those before operation,and the ODI scores at six months after operation were significantly lower than those at one week after operation (P<0.05).The ODI scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group at one week and six months after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the relative height of anterior and posterior margin of injured vertebrae and Cobb angle between the two groups before operation(P>0.05).Compared with before operation,the relative height of anterior and posterior margin of injured vertebrae increased,and the Cobb angle decreased at one week after operation (P<0.05).One week after operation,the relative height of anterior and posterior edge of vertebral body in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,and the Cobb angle in the observation group was significantly smaller than that in the control group (P<0.05).Six months after operation,the total effective rate in the observation group and the control group was 98.2% (55/56) and 87.50% (35/40),respectively.The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (χ2=4.571,P<0.05).Within one month after operation,the incidence of complications in the observation group and the control group was 7.1%(4/56) and 12.5% (5/40),respectively.The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=4.216,P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive decompression through the same incision is effective in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture with nerve injury.It has the advantages of less trauma,faster recovery and fewer postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1] 胡铮,林勇彬,林可新,等.3种不同手术入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2018,21(2):136-140.
[2] 林永绥,刘成招,王春,等.基于通道技术的微创椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(14):1278-1282.
[3] 孙兵,车晓明.视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J].中华神经外科杂志,2012,28(6):645.
[4] 宋海涛,张伟,李民,等.ASTLOF评分对胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折治疗的意义[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(2):116-121.
[5] 高凯鸣,劳杰,庄永青,等.利用经皮克氏针联合微型外固定支架技术治疗第五掌骨基底部骨折的临床疗效[J].中华手外科杂志,2018,34(3):222-224.
[6] 陈磊.后路微创小切口减压联合经皮椎弓根螺钉复位内固定术与传统开放手术治疗伴神经功能损伤胸腰椎骨折的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(19):4672-4675.
[7] 顾军,孙小明,王俊,等.后路经肌间隙椎弓根螺钉内固定术与传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折脱位型损伤的临床疗效[J].河北医学,2019,25(11):1926-1929.
[8] 张云涛,范洪武,曾建勇,等.后路小切口开窗减压融合术联合经皮固定与传统开放椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J].实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(6):205-208.
[9] 刘曙光.后路微创通道下椎管减压内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折合并神经损伤的疗效分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2019,40(2):265-267.
[10] 邹伟,肖杰,张洋,等.微创经皮椎弓根植钉并同切口通道下减压治疗A3型胸腰椎骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(7):830-836.
[11] 刘艳超,王强.后路通道下椎管减压联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折伴神经损伤的疗效观察[J].颈腰痛杂志,2019,40(5):655-657.
[12] 苏甲.微创小切口减压联合经皮内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折伴神经损害的效果观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2019,25(3):66-67.
[13] 张燕文,廖文杰,叶春梅.经皮微创和传统切口内固定治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折疗效差异[J].中国伤残医学,2019,27(13):22-23.
[14] 孙学春,陈文浩,蔡志远.两种术式对胸腰椎骨折患者椎体前缘压缩度、Cobb角的影响分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(13):2304-2306.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭新军.DRFS 钢板螺钉系统治疗胸腰椎骨折27 例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(04):263.
[2]郭新军.DRFS钢板螺钉系统治疗胸腰椎骨折27例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(04):263.
[3]李国有,刘永刚.经椎弓根植骨AF内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折18例[J].新乡医学院学报,2005,22(03):247.
[4]张国刚,程海,余峰,等.AF系统治疗胸腰椎骨折86例 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(03):257.
[5]吴永光,全炜琨,胡 玄,等.经肌间隙椎弓根螺钉固定术结合椎体内植骨术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效与安全性评价[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(11):1040.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.11.008]
 WU Yong-guang,QUAN Wei-kun,HU Xuan,et al.Evaluation of the effect and safety of intermuscular approach pedicle screw fixation combined with intravertebral bone grafting in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(12):1040.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.11.008]
[6]王小雯.血清骨桥蛋白、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白及生长分化因子15水平在急性脑梗死患者神经损伤及预后评估中的应用价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(5):479.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.05.019]
 WANG Xiao-wen.Application value of serum osteopontin,neurofibrillar acidic protein and growth differentiation factor 15 in the assessment of nerve injury and prognosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(12):479.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.05.019]
[7]方 红,史 玫,王桂芳.肌电图检查在足下垂神经损伤定位诊断中的价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2017,34(5):419.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.05.019]
 FANG Hong,SHI Mei,WANG Gui-fang.Value of electromyography in localization diagnosis of neural damage of footdrop[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2017,34(12):419.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.05.019]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-05