[1]赵　刚,张朝阳,乔师师,等.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中胆总管不同缝合方式效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(11):1080-1083.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.11.017]
　ZHAO Gang,ZHANG Chaoyang,QIAO Shishi,et al.Comparison of the effect of different suture methods of common bile duct in laparoscopic choledocholithotomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(11):1080-1083.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.11.017]
点击复制

腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中胆总管不同缝合方式效果比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年11
页码:
1080-1083
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect of different suture methods of common bile duct in laparoscopic choledocholithotomy
作者:
赵　刚1; 张朝阳1; 乔师师2; 李胜伟1; 冯大猛1; 李鹏哲1
（1.汝州市第一人民医院肝胆疝外科，河南　汝州　467599；2.郑州大学第一附属医院肝胆胰外科，河南　郑州　450052）
Author(s):
ZHAO Gang1; ZHANG Chaoyang1; QIAO Shishi2; LI Shengwei1; FENG Dameng1; LI Pengzhe1
（1.Department of Hepatobiliary and Hernia Surgery，the First People′s Hospital of Ruzhou City，Ruzhou 467599，Henan Pro-vince，China；2.Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery，the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University，Zhengzhou 450052，Henan Province，China）
关键词:
胆总管结石; 腹腔镜手术; 胆总管切开取石术; 缝合方式
Keywords:
common bile duct calculi; laparoscopic operation; choledocholithotomy; suture method
分类号:
R657.4
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.11.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中胆总管不同缝合方式的临床应用效果。方法　选择2016年7月至2018年7月汝州市第一人民医院收治的274例胆总管结石患者为研究对象，所有患者行腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术，根据术中胆总管缝合方式分为A组（n=86）、B组（n=84）和C组（n=104），A组患者术中使用可吸收缝线间断缝合胆总管，B组患者术中使用可吸收缝线连续缝合胆总管，C组患者术中使用V-lock缝线连续缝合胆总管；术中胆道镜探查后使用测压表进行胆总管测压，记录胆总管初始压力、注水最大压力和回复末压力；术后第1、3、7天使用测压表直接连接T型管检测胆总管压力。分别于术前和术后24 h检测患者血清丙氨酸转氨酶（ALT）、天冬氨酸转氨酶（AST）、总胆红素（TBIL）、丝裂原活化蛋白激酶（MAPK）水平；记录3组患者术后肠鸣音恢复时间、首次肛门排气时间、住院时间及术后7 d内胆瘘发生情况。结果　3组患者的胆总管初始压力、回复末压力比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；C组患者胆总管注水最大压力高于A组和B组（P<0.05），A组与B组患者胆总管注水最大压力比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。3组患者术后第7天胆总管压力显著低于术后第1、3天（P<0.05），3组患者术后第3天胆总管压力显著低于术后第1天（P<0.05）；术后第1、3、7天，C组患者的胆总管压力显著低于A组和B组（P<0.05），A组与B组患者的胆总管压力比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后7 d内，A组、B组和C组患者胆漏发生率分别为17.44%（15/86）、16.67%（14/84）、2.88%（3/104）；C组患者胆漏发生率显著低于A组和B组（χ2=11.632、10.731，P<0.05），A组和B组患者胆漏发生率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.018，P>0.05）。3组患者术前血清ALT、AST、TBIL、MAPK水平比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），3组患者术后24 h血清ALT、AST、TBIL、MAPK水平显著低于术前（P<0.05）；术后24 h，C组患者血清ALT、AST、TBIL、MAPK水平显著低于A组和B组（P<0.05），A组和B组患者血清ALT、AST、TBIL、MAPK水平比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。C组患者术后肠鸣音恢复时间、首次肛门排气时间、住院时间显著短于A组和B组（P<0.05），A组和B组患者术后肠鸣音恢复时间、首次肛门排气时间、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论　腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中采用V-lock缝线连续缝合胆总管可降低术后胆总管压力和胆漏发生率，有利于患者术后快速康复。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical application effect of different suture methods of the common bile duct in laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.Methods　A total of 274 patients with common bile duct calculi admitted to the First People′s Hospital of Ruzhou City from July 2016 to July 2018 were selected as the research subjects.All patients underwent laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and were divided into group A （n=86），group B （n=84） and group C （n=104） according to the suture mode of common bile duct.The interrupted suture of common bile duct with absorbable suture was performed in the patients of the group A，the continuous suture of common bile duct with absorbable suture was performed in the patients of the group B，while the continuous suture of common bile duct with V-lock suture was performed in the patients of the group C.The intraoperative common bile duct pressure was measured by pressure gauge after choledochoscopy，and the initial pressure，the maximum pressure of water injection and the pressure at the end of recovery of the common bile duct were recorded.The pressure of common bile duct was measured by pressure gauge connecting T-tube on the 1st，3rd and 7th day after operation.The levels of serum alanine transarninase （ALT），aspartate aminotransferase （AST），total bilirubin （TBIL） and mitogen activated protein kinase （MAPK） were detected before and 24 hours after operation.The peristaltic sound recovery time，the first anal exhaust time，hospitalization time and the incidence of bile leakage within 7 days after operation were recorded.Results　There was no significant difference in the initial pressure and the pressure at the end of recovery of the common bile duct among the three groups （P>0.05）.The maximum pressure of water injection of common bile duct in the group C was higher than that in the group A and group B （P<0.05），but there was no significant difference in the maximum pressure of water injection between the group A and group B （P>0.05）.The pressure of common bile duct on the 7th day was significantly lower than that on the 1st and 3rd day after operation （P<0.05），and the pressure of common bile duct on the 3rd day was significantly lower than that on the 1st day after operation in the three groups （P<0.05）.On the 1st，3rd and 7th day after operation，the pressure of common bile duct in the group C was significantly lower than that in the group A and group B （P<0.05），but there was no significant difference in the pressure of common bile duct between the group A and group B （P>0.05）.Within 7 days after operation，the incidence of bile leakage in the group A，group B and group C was 17.44% （15/86），16.67% （14/84） and 2.88% （3/104），respectively.The incidence of bile leakage in the group C was significantly lower than that in the group A and group B （χ2=11.632，10.731；P<0.05），but there was no significant difference in the incidence of bile leakage between the group A and group B （χ2=0.018，P>0.05）.There was no significant difference in serum ALT，AST，TBIL and MAPK levels among the three groups before operation （P>0.05）.The levels of serum ALT，AST，TBIL and MAPK at 24 hours after operation were significantly lower than those before operation （P<0.05）.At 24 hours after operation，the levels of serum ALT，AST，TBIL and MAPK in the group C were significantly lower than those in the group A and group B （P<0.05），but there was no significant difference in the levels of serum ALT，AST，TBIL and MAPK between the group A and group B （P>0.05）.The peristaltic sound recovery time，the first anal exhaust time and hospitalization time in the group C were significantly shorter than those in the group A and group B （P<0.05）.There was no significant difference in the peristaltic sound recovery time，the first anal exhaust time and hospitalization time between the group A and group B （P>0.05）.Conclusion　The continuous suture of common bile duct with V-lock suture in laparoscopic choledocholithotomy can reduce the postoperative common bile duct pressure and the incidence of bile leakage，which is conducive to the rapid recovery of patients after operation.

参考文献/References:

［1］　石志平，吴同玉.乙型肝炎肝硬化发病机制特点研究概况［J］.辽宁中医药大学学报，2014，16（1）：91-94.
［2］　丁晓琳，张伦军，刘蕴霞，等.乙型肝炎病毒前S1抗原检测在临床中的应用［J］.中华全科医学，2012，10（1）：109-110.
［3］　朱复生.复方鳖甲软肝片防治乙型肝炎后肝硬化的相关研究进展［J］.天津药学，2016，28（4）：42-45.
［4］　陈琳.复方鳖甲软肝片治疗乙肝肝硬化的疗效分析和药理研究［J］.中国现代药物应用，2019，13（4）：139-141.
［5］　中华医学会肝病学会.肝硬化诊治指南［J］.中华肝脏病杂志，2019，27（11）：846-865.
［6］　余思邈，金亮，朱云，等.中药软肝方改善乙型肝炎肝硬化肝纤维化的临床疗效观察［J］.中国中西医结合消化杂志，2019，27（5）：330-332.
［7］　肖玲，杨玉宇，徐莉.恩替卡韦联合复方鳖甲软肝片治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的临床效果观察［J］.中国医药科学，2013，3（14）：59-60.
［8］　郝晓芳，高晓红.恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化研究进展［J］.肝脏，2017，22（3）：271-273.
［9］　赵巍峰，王园园，李赢，等.安络化纤丸和恩替卡韦联合治疗对乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者肝纤维化和炎性因子的影响［J］.新乡医学院学报，2019，36（4）：319-322.
［10］　张宁，肖小河，周双男，等.复方鳖甲软肝片对乙型肝炎血清纤维化标志物作用的meta分析［J］.实用肝脏病杂志，2012，15（6）：524-526.
［11］　夏晖，张宁，周双男，等.复方鳖甲软肝片抗肝纤维化研究进展［J］.医药导报，2013，32（4）：500-503.
［12］　吴刚，何鸿雁，李烨，等.复方鳖甲软肝片联合恩替卡韦对HBV相关肝硬化患者的临床疗效观察［J］.中华肝脏病杂志，2014，22（8）：604-608.
［13］　安红杰，周东方.恩替卡韦联合复方鳖甲软肝片治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效及转归研究［J］.实用肝脏病杂志，2018，21（6）：903-906.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘红波,杨　军,丁　浩.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(09):841.
[2]张译心,王秀美,薛晓玲.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂对保守性腹腔镜手术后卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者疼痛及生殖激素水平的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(8):785.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.020]
　ZHANG Yi-xin,WANG Xiu-mei,XUE Xiao-ling.Effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on pain and reproductive hormone levels in patients with ovarian endometriosis after conservative laparoscopic surgery[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(11):785.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.020]
[3]范毛川,余沁楠,朱　峰,等.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放性前列腺癌根治术治疗早期前列腺癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(8):748.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011]
　FAN Mao-chuan,YU Qin-nan,ZHU Feng,et al.Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the treatment of early prostate cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(11):748.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011]
[4]王政强,王　春.腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(4):386.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.04.020]
　WANG Zhengqiang,WANG Chun.Comparison of the curative effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(11):386.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.04.020]
[5]彭荣芳,林　芳,钟爱群,等.保留子宫的腹腔镜后路骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗中重度中盆腔缺陷疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(2):156.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.02.013]
　PENG Rongfang,LIN Fang,ZHONG Aiqun,et al.Effect of laparoscopic posterior approach sacrospinous ligament suspension with preservation of uterus in the treatment of moderate and severe mid pelvic defects[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(11):156.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.02.013]
[6]关新垒,华彩红,王世进,等.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(3):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
　GUAN Xinlei,HUA Caihong,WANG Shijin,et al.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(11):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
[7]郭祥翠,王倩青,李　力,等.纳米炭与吲哚菁绿在腹腔镜早期宫颈癌根治术中前哨淋巴结示踪效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(10):955.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.10.012]
　GUO Xiangcui,WANG Qianqing,LI Li,et al.Comparison of sentinel lymph node tracking effect between carbon nanonarticles and indocyanine green in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(11):955.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.10.012]
[8]杨振方.开腹手术史对腹腔镜结肠癌根治术效果的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(2):178.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.020]
　YANG Zhen-fang.Influence of laparotomy history on laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(11):178.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.020]
[9]王　珂,李宛玲,姜克萍.腹腔镜囊肿剥除术与腹腔镜囊肿电凝术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(3):271.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.016]
　WANG Ke,LI Wan-ling,JIANG Ke-ping.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic oophorocystectomy and laparoscopic electrocoagulation in the treatment of ovarian endometriosis cyst[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(11):271.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.016]
[10]李智永,尚　卿,杜太平.经肛拖出式全腹腔镜直肠前切除术与腹腔镜直肠前切除术治疗中低位直肠癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(4):376.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.04.019]
　LI Zhi-yong,SHANG Qing,DU Tai-ping.Comparison of the effect between transanal pull-out total laparoscopic anterior resection of rectum and laparoscopic anterior resection of rectum in the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(11):376.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.04.019]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-05