[1]赖江峰,彭 静,蓝诚红,等.雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射联合玻璃体切割术治疗玻璃体积血疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(7):691-695.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.07.022]
 LAI Jiangfeng,PENG Jing,LAN Chenghong,et al.Therapeutic effect of intravitreal injection of leizumab combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of vitreous hemorrhage[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(7):691-695.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.07.022]
点击复制

雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射联合玻璃体切割术治疗玻璃体积血疗效观察
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年7
页码:
691-695
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Therapeutic effect of intravitreal injection of leizumab combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of vitreous hemorrhage
作者:
赖江峰彭 静蓝诚红余兆敏李达佑
(梅州市人民医院眼一科 ,广东 梅州 514000)
Author(s):
LAI JiangfengPENG JingLAN ChenghongYU ZhaominLI Dayou
(Department of Ophthalmology,Meizhou People′s Hospital,Meizhou 514000,Guangdong Province,China)
关键词:
玻璃体积血玻璃体切割术雷珠单抗新生血管炎症反应眼压
Keywords:
vitreous hemorrhagevitrectomyranibizumabneovascularizationinflammatory responseintraocular pressure
分类号:
R776.4
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.07.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合玻璃体切割术治疗玻璃体积血的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析梅州市人民医院2016年3月至2018年5月收治的129例玻璃体积血患者的临床资料,按治疗方法将患者分为3组。注药组43例(49只眼)患者行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗,玻切组43例(49只眼)患者行玻璃体切割术治疗,联合治疗组43例(51只眼)患者行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合玻璃体切割术治疗。分别于治疗前和治疗后1个月抽取患者患眼前房房水0.1 mL,采用酶联免疫法检测前房房水中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平;比较3组患者治疗前及治疗后1、3、6、12个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)及眼内压;记录患者术中及术后并发症发生情况。结果 治疗前3组患者前房房水中VEGF、hs-CRP水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组患者治疗后1个月前房房水中VEGF、hs-CRP水平均显著低于治疗前(P<0.01)。治疗后1个月,联合治疗组患者前房房水中VEGF、hs-CRP水平显著低于注药组和玻切组(P<0.05),注药组患者前房房水中VEGF、hs-CRP水平显著低于玻切组(P<0.05)。治疗前3组患者LogMAR BCVA比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组患者治疗后LogMAR BCVA随时间的延长均逐渐降低(P<0.01)。联合治疗组患者治疗后各时间点LogMAR BCVA均显著低于注药组和玻切组(P<0.05),注药组和玻切组患者治疗后各时间点LogMAR BCVA比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前3组患者眼内压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组患者治疗后各时间点之间眼内压比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),且治疗后各时间点3组患者间眼内压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。注药组、玻切组和联合治疗组患者总并发症发生率分别为20.00%(3/15)、77.55%(38/49)、15.68%(8/51),联合治疗组患者总并发症发生率显著低于玻切组(χ2=12.294,P<0.01),联合治疗组与注药组患者总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.068,P>0.05);注药组与玻切组患者总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.963,P>0.05)。结论 玻璃体切割术前玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗能有效抑制新生血管形成,减缓眼部炎症反应,减少术中并发症,促进患者术后视力恢复。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of intravitreal injection of leizumab combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of vitreous hemorrhage.Methods The clinical data of 129 patients with vitreous hemorrhage admitted to Meizhou People’s Hospital from March 2016 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into 3 groups according to the treatment methods.The 43 patients (49 eyes) in the drug injection group were received intravitreal injection of leizhumab,the 43 patients (49 eyes) in the vitrectomy group received vitrectomy,and 43 patients (51 eyes) in the combined treatment group received intravitreal injection of leizhumab and vitrectomy.The aqueous humor(0.1 mL) of anterior chamber was extracted from all patients before and 1 month after treatment and the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in anterior aqueous humor were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and the intraocular pressure of patients before treatment and 1,3,6,12 months after treatment were compared among the three groups.The complications during and after operation were recorded.Results There was no significant difference in the levels of VEGF and hs-CRP in the aqueous humor of anterior chamber of patients among the three groups before treatment (P>0.05).The levels of VEGF and hs-CRP in the aqueous humor of anterior chamber of patients at 1 month after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment in the three groups (P<0.01).One month after the treatment,the levels of VEGF and hs-CRP in the aqueous humor of anterior chamber of patients in the combined treatment group were significantly lower than those in the drug injection group and the vitrectomy group (P<0.05);the levels of VEGF and hs-CRP in the aqueous humor of anterior chamber of patients in the drug injection group were significantly lower than those in the vitrectomy group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in LogMAR BCVA among the three groups before treatment (P>0.05).After treatment,the LogMAR BCVA of patients in the three groups decreased with the increase of time (P<0.01).The LogMAR BCVA of patients in the combined treatment group was significantly lower than that in the drug injection group and the vitrectomy group at each time point after treatment (P<0.05);there was no significant difference in LogMAR BCVA of patients between the drug injection group and the vitrectomy group at each time point after treatment (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the intraocular pressure of patients among the three groups before treatment (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the intraocular pressure of patients among each time point after treatment in the three groups (P>0.05);there was no significant difference in the intraocular pressure of patients among the three groups at each time point after treatment (P>0.05).The total complication rate of patients in the drug injection group,vitrectomy group and the combined treatment group was 20.00% (3/15),77.55%(38/49),15.68%(8/51)respectively;the total incidence of complication of patients in the combination treatment group was significantly lower than that in the vitrectomy group (χ2= 12.294,P<0.01);there was no statistic difference in the total incidence of complication between the combination treatment group and the drug injection group (χ2=1.068,P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the drug injection group and the vitrectomy group(χ2=0.963,P>0.05).Conclusion The intravitreal injection of leizumab before vitrectomy can effectively inhibit the formation of neovascularization,lessen inflammatory reaction of eyes,reduce intraoperative complications,and promote postoperative visual recovery of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈安冉,李馥,赵海峰,等.435例玻璃体切除术的病因及疗效分析[J].临床眼科杂志,2018(4):305-307.
[2] 张萃丽,张明媚,陈雪艺.玻璃体积血的病因分析及手术治疗的疗效[J].国际眼科杂志,2014,14(4):711-713.
[3] 高宁,邸瑢,谢安明,等.PDR合并玻璃体积血的玻璃体手术时机对术后远期疗效的影响[J].国际眼科杂志,2017,17(9):1738-1740.
[4] 梁泽玉,陈松,何广辉,等.术前及术中2次应用康柏西普辅助玻璃体切割术治疗增生型糖尿病视网膜病变的临床研究[J].眼科新进展,2019,39(2):162-167.
[5] 施殿雄.实用眼科诊断[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005:634-636.
[6] 陶勇,侯婧,黎晓新,等.254例息肉样脉络膜血管病变的临床特征分析[J].中华眼底病杂志,2012,28(5):441-444.
[7] 田岩,朱宁云,回世洋,等.糖尿病性视网膜病变玻璃体积血中西医治疗临床观察[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(5):181-182.
[8] 申战省,陈梦平.25G玻璃体切除手术联合玻璃体腔注药治疗糖尿病性玻璃体积血[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2017,19(5):307-310.
[9] 佘洁婷,张国明,赵铁英,等.雷珠单抗联合玻璃体切除术治疗息肉状脉络膜血管病变合并玻璃体积血疗效观察[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2015,33(8):913-917.
[10] LINCOFF H,MADJAROV B,LINCOFF N,et al.Pathogenesis of the vitreous cloud emanating from subretinal hemorrhage[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2003,121(1):91-96.
[11] 李蓉,姚杨,杜军辉,姚国敏,等.自噬在高糖条件下视网膜色素上皮细胞表达血管内皮生长因子促进RF/6A细胞血管生成中的作用[J].眼科新进展,2019,39(8):714-718.
[12] JARDELEZA M S R,MILLER J W.Review of anti-VEGF therapy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy[J].Semin Ophthalmol,2009,24(2):87-92.
[13] 魏艳丽,冉莉君,廖洪霞,等.康柏西普与雷珠单抗对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者血清CRP、VEGF、眼压及视力的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(8):125-128.
[14] 孟娜,任百超.贝伐单抗玻璃体腔注射对PDR伴玻璃体积血的治疗效果[J].国际眼科杂志,2016,16(5):972-974.
[15] 赖江峰,彭静,蓝诚红,等.玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗对玻璃体切割术治疗玻璃体积血手术效果及并发症的影响[J].中国医学创新,2020,17(6):30-33.
[16] 李隽,徐国兴.玻璃体切除术前注射抗VEGF类药物治疗PDF的疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2017,17(8):1446-1456.
[17] 万晶,孙会清,苏艺.抗血管内皮生长因子药物玻璃体腔注射联合与不联合光动力疗法治疗渗出型老年黄斑变性疗效比较[J].现代仪器与医疗,2017,23(1):112-114.

相似文献/References:

[1]柴树洁,孙秀慧,刘向玲.家属参与性延续护理对糖尿病视网膜病变患者玻璃体切割术后治疗依从性及并发症的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2021,38(1):080.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.01.018]
 CHAI Shujie,SUN Xiuhui,LIU Xiangling.Effect of family′s participatory continuing nursing on treatment compliance and complications of the patients with diabetic retinopathy after vitrectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2021,38(7):080.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.01.018]
[2]李春艳,朱安泰.糖尿病视网膜病变并发玻璃体积血手术时机选择[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(8):731.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.021]
 LI Chun-yan,ZHU An-tai.Choice of the operative opportunity for diabetic retinopathy complicated with vitreous hemorrhage[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(7):731.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.021]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-05