[1]牛丹丹,吕本艳.原发性高血压病患者交感神经和迷走神经张力对静息心率的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(5):430-432.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.05.007]
 NIU Dandan,LYU Benyan.Effects of sympathetic nerve and vagal nerve tension on resting heart rate in patients with essential hypertension[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(5):430-432.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.05.007]
点击复制

原发性高血压病患者交感神经和迷走神经张力对静息心率的影响
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年5
页码:
430-432
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-05-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of sympathetic nerve and vagal nerve tension on resting heart rate in patients with essential hypertension
作者:
牛丹丹1吕本艳2
(1.新乡市中心医院心电图室,河南 新乡 453000;2.新乡医学院管理学院,河南 新乡 453003)
Author(s):
NIU Dandan1LYU Benyan2
(1.Electrocardiogram Room,Central Hospital of Xinxiang City,Xinxiang 453000,Henan Province,China;2.School of Management,Xinxiang Medical University,Xinxiang 453003, Henan Province,China)
关键词:
原发性高血压交感神经迷走神经静息心率
Keywords:
essential hypertensionsympathetic nervevagus nerveresting heart rate
分类号:
R544.1
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.05.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析原发性高血压病患者交感神经和迷走神经张力对静息心率的影响。方法 选择2018年6月至2019年6月新乡市中心医院收治的120例原发性高血压病患者为研究对象,根据静息心率将患者分为A组(静息心率<60次·min-1)、B组(静息心率60~75次·min-1)和C组(静息心率>75次·min-1),每组40例。所有患者进行24 h动态心电图检测,对各组患者极低频带(VLF)、低频带(LF)、高频带(HF)、心率减速力(DC)、LF/HF比值进行比较。结果 3组患者VLF、LF、HF、DC、LF/HF比值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组患者VLF、LF、HF、DC值显著高于B组和C组(P<0.05);B组患者VLF、LF、HF、DC值显著高于C组(P<0.05);C组患者LF/HF比值显著高于A组和B组(P<0.05);A组患者LF/HF比值与B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。静息心率与VLF、LF、HF、DC呈负相关(P<0.05),与LF/HF比值呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论 静息心率为60~75次·min-1的原发性高血压病患者静息心率主要受迷走神经紊乱影响,静息心率>75次·min-1的原发性高血压病患者静息心率主要受交感神经紊乱影响。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the effect of sympathetic nerve and vagal nerve tension on resting heart rate(RHR) in patients with essential hypertension.Methods A total of 120 patients with essential hypertension who were hospitalized in Central Hospital of Xinxiang City from June 2018 to June 2019 were selected as the research subjects.According to different levels of RHR,the patients were divided into group A (RHR<60 times per minute),group B (RHR of 60-75 times per minute) and group C (RHR>75 times per minute),with 40 patients in each group.All patients underwent the test of 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram,and the very low frequency band (VLF),low frequency band (LF),high frequency band (HF),heart rate deceleration (DC) and LF/HF ratio of patients were compared among the three groups.Results There were statistically significant differences in the VLF,LF,HF,DC and LF/HF ratio among the three groups (P<0.05);the VLF,LF,HF and DC values of patients in the group A were significantly higher than those in the group B and group C (P<0.05);the VLF,LF,HF and DC values of patients in the group B were significantly higher than those in the group C (P<0.05);the LF/HF ratio in the group C was significantly higher than that in the group A and the group B (P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the LF/HF ratio between the group A and the group B (P>0.05).RHR was negatively correlated with VLF,LF,HF and DC (P<0.05),and it was positively correlated with LF/HF ratio (P<0.05) Conclusion The RHR of essential hypertensive patients with RHR of 60-75 times per minute is mainly affected by vagus nerve disorder,while that of essential hypertensive patients with RHR more than 75 times per minute is mainly affected by sympathetic nerve disorder.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈各才,杨向军,阮中宝,等.低静息心率与≥65岁心房颤动患者导管消融术后复发的关系研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2019,12(5):20-24.
[2] 郭璐映,刘儒,张保朝.单纯舒张期高血压患者舒张压峰值与颈动脉粥样硬化的相关性[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(4):320-322.
[3] 张静,郑彤,林瑶,等.血管迷走性晕厥患儿静息状态下心率减速力及心率变异性的变化[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2019,34(13):986-989.
[4] 秦玉东,陈锋,胡强,等.夷陵地区中老年人群静息心率升高与脂代谢异常的相关性研究[J].内科理论与实践,2019,14(3):172-177.
[5] 刘新,张旗,耿巍,等.静息心率对慢性心力衰竭合并高血压患者心功能及预后的影响[J].临床荟萃,2018,33(12):1044-1048.
[6] 梁福俐.不同海拔藏、汉族健康青年人静息心率、QTc间期、Tp-Te间期及血压的研究[D].青海:青海大学,2018.
[7] 卢佳佳,宋旷蓉,张硕,等.原发性高血压病患者交感神经与迷走神经张力对静息心率的影响研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(29):3596-3600.
[8] 冯学宁.缬沙坦对老年原发性高血压患者静息心率及交感神经活性的影响[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(13):68-69.
[9] 唐雪敏,景颖颖.比索洛尔联合音乐疗法对原发性高血压患者静息心率及交感神经活性的影响[J].中国药业,2015,24(12):38-40.
[10] 刘孟颖,吴升平,茹小娟,等.家庭远程监测系统下社区中老年人早晚时段心率差值及高水平静息心率的影响因素分析[J].中国全科医学,2016,19(30):3729-3734.
[11] 应丽娟,梁敏烈.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征对高血压患者心脏自主神经功能的影响[J].中国临床研究,2018,31(12):1648-1651.
[12] 高四红,任建立.氨氯地平并缬沙坦对高血压合并肾损伤患者自主神经功能及血清Rho相关蛋白激酶1的影响[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2019,28(1):87-91.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙丽娟,徐秀敏,王建周,等.82例高血压患者16项人格特质测验[J].新乡医学院学报,1994,11(03):224.
[2]赵建萍,赵秀娟,武德珍.维拉帕米缓释片与普通片对原发性高血压降压效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(05):371.
[3]杨志平,扈秀丽,王津生.培哚普利与非洛地平逆转原发性高血压左室肥厚的对比研究[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(04):332.
[4]成 力,陈文江,姚 峰,等.miRNA-505-3p在原发性高血压发病机制中的作用[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(11):965.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.005]
 CHENG Li,CHEN Wen-jiang,YAO Feng,et al.Role of miRNA-505-3p in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(5):965.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.005]
[5]李清红,王晓宇,栗夏莲.2型糖尿病并发原发性高血压患者心脏结构和功能变化[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(4):314.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.04.014]
 LI Qing-hong,WANG Xiao-yu,LI Xia-lian.Changes of cardiac structure and function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with essential hypertension[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(5):314.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.04.014]
[6]林凤平,何望安.老年原发性高血压患者记忆障碍及其危险因素分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(3):212.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.03.014]
 LIN Feng-ping,HE Wang-an.Risk factors for memory disorders in elderly patients with primary hypertension[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(5):212.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.03.014]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-05