[1]赵冬太,李雪梅.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗发病4.5~9.0 h脑梗死的有效性及安全性[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(9):872-874.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.09.016]
 ZHAO Dong-tai,LI Xue-mei.Efficacy and safety of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in the treatment of cerebral infarction within 4.5-9.0 hours[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(9):872-874.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.09.016]
点击复制

重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗发病4.5~9.0 h脑梗死的有效性及安全性
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
36
期数:
2019年9
页码:
872-874
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy and safety of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in the treatment of cerebral infarction within 4.5-9.0 hours
作者:
赵冬太李雪梅
(新乡市第一人民医院急诊科,河南 新乡 453000)
Author(s):
ZHAO Dong-taiLI Xue-mei
(Department of Emergency,the First People′s Hospital of Xinxiang City,Xinxiang 453000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
脑梗死重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂神经功能缺损预后
Keywords:
cerebral infarctionrecombinant tissue plasminogen activatorneurological deficitprognosis
分类号:
R743.33
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.09.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)治疗发病4.5~9.0 h脑梗死的有效性及安全性。方法 将2013年4月至2018年3月新乡市第一人民医院收治的82例发病时间为4.5~9.0 h的脑梗死患者根据治疗方法分为对照组(n=40)和观察组(n=42),对照组患者行常规治疗,观察组患者在常规治疗基础上应用rt-PA治疗。治疗前、治疗后24 h及7、14 d,采用美国国立卫生研究院中风量表(NIHSS)判断患者的神经功能缺损情况;治疗后90 d,利用Barthel指数评估2组患者日常生活活动能力,采用修订Rankin量表(mRS)评估患者预后情况;比较2组患者不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗前,2组患者NIHSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后24 h及7、14 d,观察组患者NIHSS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05);治疗后90 d,观察组患者Barthel指数高于对照组,mRS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组患者不良反应发生率分别为17.50%(7/40)和21.43%(9/42)。2组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.201,P>0.05)。观察组患者预后理想者比例明显高于对照组(χ2=4.010,P<0.05)。结论 rt-PA治疗发病时间为4.5~9.0 h的脑梗死患者,可有效减轻其机体神经功能缺损程度,增强日常生活活动能力,改善预后,且不增加不良反应发生风险。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in the treatment of cerebral infarction within 4.5-9.0 hours.Methods Eighty-two patients with cerebral infarction with an onset time of 4.5-9.0 hours were divided into control group(n=40)and observation group(n=42) according to the treatment method.The patients in the control group were received conventional therapy.The patients in the observation group were treated with rt-PA on the basis of conventional therapy.The neurological deficits of the patients in the two groups before treatment and at 24 hours,7 and 14 days after treatment was estimated by national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS).The ability of daily life activities of the patients in the two groups was evaluated by Barthel index at 90 days after treatment.The prognosis of the patients in the two groups was assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS).The adverse reactions in the two groups were compared.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the NIHSS scores between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05).The NIHSS score of patients in the observation group was lower than that in the control group at 24 hours,7 and 14 days after treatment (P<0.05).The Barthel score of patients in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and mRS score was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).The adverse reaction rate of the control group and observation group was 17.50% (7/40) and 21.43% (9/42),respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in the adverse reaction between the two groups (χ2=0.201,P>0.05).The proportion of patients with ideal prognosis in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=4.010,P<0.05).Conclusion rt-PA treating cerebral infarction patients with onset time of 4.5-9.0 hours can effectively reduce the degree of neurological impairment,enhance the ability of daily life activities,improve the prognosis,and do not increase the risk of adverse reactions.

参考文献/References:

[1] 贾立明,武正戈,赵玉芳,等.阿替普酶在急性脑梗死治疗中的应用效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(19):22-23.
[2] 王茂湘,范铁平,王晓东,等.急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓后出血转化的危险因素分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2017,40(8):731-734.
[3] 罗玉球,邓晓清.扩大时间窗rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗椎-基底动脉系统脑梗死的疗效观察[J].中国现代医生,2017,55(28):21-23.
[4] 姜永宁,宋明明.不同时间窗rt-PA静脉溶栓对椎-基底动脉系统脑梗死患者康复效果的影响[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(17):132-132.
[5] 金肇权,张文彬.不同时间窗rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗后循环脑梗死的疗效[J].医药前沿,2016,6(26):131-132.
[6] 赵秀欣,穆利春,马丽芳.rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死临床分析[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2016,8(4):486-488.
[7] 李晨晨,吴君仓.在不同时间对急性脑梗死患者进行静脉溶栓治疗的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛,2017,15(10):52-53.
[8] 顾亮亮,张保朝,付国惠.rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗不同时间窗椎-基底动脉系统脑梗死的临床疗效观察[J].中风与神经疾病,2016,33(1):64-66.

相似文献/References:

[1]王泰安.复方丹参联用纳络酮治疗急性脑梗死31例[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(04):278.
[2]陈 娟,吕文国.黄芪注射液联合复方丹参注射液治疗急性脑梗死30例[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(02):083.
[3]李素芳,王艳.降纤酶联用低分子肝素治疗脑梗死疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(06):502.
[4]刘世峰,刘江峰.降纤酶与东菱克栓酶治疗急性脑梗死的临床对照观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(04):291.
[5]张思莲.脑梗死患者患侧股骨颈骨折术后护理[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(05):441.
[6]汪裕荣.灯盏花注射液治疗急性脑梗死128例[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(01):050.
[7]丁泽昌,吕荣亚.降纤酶治疗脑梗死40例临床疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):438.
[8]崔光琴,王凯。.脑梗死70例急性期血压变化[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):447.
[9]张晨光,沈琪琳,马振武,等.急性脑梗死患者血液流变学及血细胞参数的变化[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(03):177.
[10]周俐红,陈 娟.老年脑梗死合并感染30例分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(03):210.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-05