[1]仝玉珠.宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥形切除术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ级宫颈上皮内瘤变疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(11):1001-1004.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.014]
　TONG Yu-zhu.Clinical effect of hysteroscopic assisted cold knife conization in treating grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(11):1001-1004.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.014]
点击复制

宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥形切除术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ级宫颈上皮内瘤变疗效观察
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年11
页码:
1001-1004
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical effect of hysteroscopic assisted cold knife conization in treating grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
作者:
仝玉珠
（许昌市中医院妇产科，河南　许昌　461000）
Author(s):
TONG Yu-zhu
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xuchang City,Xuchang 461000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
宫颈上皮内瘤变; 宫颈冷刀锥切术; 宫腔镜
Keywords:
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; cervical cold knife conization; hysteroscopy
分类号:
R737.33
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　探讨宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥形切除术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ级宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）的临床效果。方法　将2015年7月至2016年9月许昌市中医院收治的经组织活检确诊为Ⅱ、Ⅲ级CIN的118例患者分为对照组（n=62）和观察组(n=56)。对照组患者给予宫腔镜宫颈锥形切除术，观察组患者给予宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥形切除术。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及术后6个月液基薄层细胞检测异常率、高危人乳头瘤病毒清除率、CIN复发率，并观察2组患者术后并发症发生情况。结果　所有患者成功实施手术，无术中转行其他手术者,手术成功率100.0%。观察组患者术中出血量显著高于对照组（t=6.322，P<0.05），2组患者的手术时间及住院时间比较差异无统计学意义（t=0.753、0.315，P>0.05）。术后6个月，对照组患者液基薄层细胞检测异常率、CIN复发率、高危人乳头瘤病毒清除率分别为12.9%（8/62）、6.5%（4/62）和95.2%（59/62），观察组患者液基薄层细胞检测异常率、CIN复发率、高危人乳头瘤病毒清除率分别为8.9（5/56）、1.8（1/56）和98.2%（55/56），2组患者液基薄层细胞检测异常率、CIN复发率、高危人乳头瘤病毒清除率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.471、0.642、0.160，P>0.05）。对照组患者术后宫颈粘连发生率及月经异常率分别为14.5%（9/62）、14.5%（9/62），观察组患者术后宫颈粘连发生率及月经异常率分别为1.8%（1/56）、1.8%（1/56），观察组患者术后宫颈粘连发生率及月经异常率显著低于对照组（χ2=4.623、4.623，P<0.05）。结论　宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥切术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ级CIN安全有效，术后宫颈粘连发生率及月经异常率低。
Abstract:
Objective　To evaluate the clinical effect of hysteroscopic assisted cold knife conization in the treating grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).Methods　One hundred and eighteen patients with grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ of CIN diagnosed by biopsy and pathology in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xuchang City from July 2015 to September 2016 were selected and divided into control group（n=62） and observation group(n=56).The patients in the control group were given hysteroscopic cervical conization and the patients in the observation group were given hysteroscope assisted cold knife conization.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss，hospital stay and abnormal rate of thin-cytologic test,high-risk human papillomavirus clearance rate,CIN recurrence rate at six months after operation were compared between the two groups.The postoperative complications were also observed and compared between the two groups.Results　All patients were successfully operated,with a success rate of 100.0%.The amount of bleeding during operation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t=6.322，P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time and hospitalization time（t=0.753，0.315；P>0.05）.Six months after operation,the abnormal rate of liquid based thin layer cells,CIN recurrence rate and high-risk human papillomavirus clearance rate in the control group was 12.9%（8/62）,6.5%（4/62）,95.2%（59/62），respectively.While it was 8.9（5/56）,1.8（1/56）,98.2%（55/56） respectively in the observation group.There was no statistically significant difference in the abnormal rate of thin-cytologic test,CIN recurrence rate and high-risk human papillomavirus clearance rate between the two groups (χ2=0.471，0.642,0.160；P>0.05).The incidence of cervical adhesions and abnormal rate of menstruation in the control group was 14.5%（9/62） and 14.5%（9/62）,while it was 1.8%（1/56） and 1.8%（1/56）in the observation group.The incidence of cervical adhesions and abnormal rate of menstruation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group（χ2=4.623,4.623；P<0.05）.Conclusion　Hysteroscopic assisted cold knife conization in the treatment of grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ CIN is safe and effective.The incidence of cervical adhesions and menstrual abnormality decreased significantly.

参考文献/References:

［1］　于露露,陈汶.子宫颈癌筛查技术新进展［J］.中华妇产科杂志,2015,50(4):312-315.
［2］　KOISS R,BONCZ I,HERNDI Z,et al.Proposal for the modernization of cervical screening procedure in Hungary［J］.Orv Hetil,2017,158(52):2062-2067.
［3］　张珊,官海涟,丁锦红，等.宫颈癌及其癌前病变的分子标志物临床应用进展［J］.实用妇产科杂志,2016,32(7):503-506.
［4］　王兴民,傅锦坚,庞朗,等.P16免疫组织化学检测评价高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变锥形切除后残留的临床价值［J］.重庆医学,2017,46(23):3216-3218.
［5］　SONG T,SEONG S J,KIM B G.Regeneration process after cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia［J］.Obstet Gynecol，2016，128(6):1258-1264.
［6］　张春柳.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变锥切术后对妊娠及妊娠结局的影响［J］.医学综述,2016,22(16):3161-3164.
［7］　GONZLEZ-BOSQUET E,FERNANDEZ S,SABRA S,et al.Negative HPV testing among patients with biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or cervical cancer［J］.Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2017，36(2):229-231.
［8］　吴少萍.宫颈冷刀锥切术后生育能力和妊娠结局的观察［J］.现代临床医学,2017,43(1):40-41,44.
［9］　颜建英,陈敏.LEEP术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变对妊娠母儿相关结局影响的Meta分析［J］.国际妇产科学杂志,2017,44(4):418-429.
［10］　苗欣欣,赵福杰.单、双极电凝在宫颈锥形切除术中的应用价值［J］.中国医科大学学报,2016,45(6):554-557.
［11］　TOMAO F,MARUCCIO M,PRETI E P,et al.Conization in early stage cervical cancer:pattern of recurrence in a 10-year single-institution experience［J］.Int J Gynecol Cancer，2017，27(5):1001-1008.
［12］　刘宇,王颖,王沂峰，等.宫颈冷刀锥切术和宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效分析［J］.实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(6):434-437.
［13］　武晓红.宫颈锥切术后预防宫颈颈管粘连的临床策略［J］.山西职工医学院学报,2016,26(3):47-48.
［14］　GATTA L A,KULLER J A,RHEE E H J.Pregnancy outcomes following cervical conization or loop electrosurgical excision procedures［J］.Obstet Gynecol Surv，2017，72(8):494-499.
［15］　董华娟,邱莉,白凤琴，等.宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥切术与传统冷刀锥切术治疗子宫颈上皮内瘤变 Ⅲ 期的临床疗效比较［J］.实用医院临床杂志,2016,13(4):73-75.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-05