[1]任柏林,冯爱敏,乔迎帅,等.腰方肌与腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜手术中的镇痛效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(8):719-721.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.018]
 REN Bo-lin,FENG Ai-min,QIAO Ying-shuai,et al.Comparison of the analgesic effect between quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic operation[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(8):719-721.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.018]
点击复制

腰方肌与腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜手术中的镇痛效果比较
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年8
页码:
719-721
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the analgesic effect between quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic operation
作者:
任柏林冯爱敏乔迎帅王建伟卢锡华
(郑州大学附属肿瘤医院麻醉科,河南 郑州 450008)
Author(s):
REN Bo-linFENG Ai-minQIAO Ying-shuaiWANG Jian-weiLU Xi-hua
(Department of Anesthesiology,the Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450008,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
腹腔镜手术腰方肌阻滞腹横肌平面阻滞超声引导
Keywords:
laparoscopic operationquadratus lumborum blocktransversus abdominis plane blockultrasonic guidance
分类号:
R614
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.08.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较超声引导下腰方肌阻滞(QLB)与腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)在腹腔镜手术中的镇痛效果。方法 选择2016年1月至2017年12月于郑州大学附属肿瘤医院拟行全身麻醉下腹腔镜手术患者160例,将患者分为QLB组(n=78)和TAPB组(n=82),2组患者分别于全身麻醉诱导前完成神经阻滞,超声引导下,QLB组患者于双侧腰方肌后表面各给予3.75 g·L-1罗哌卡因20 mL,TAPB组患者于双侧腹内斜肌和腹直肌筋膜层各给予3.75 g·L-1罗哌卡因20 mL。记录2组患者术中舒芬太尼用量、苏醒时间、拔除气管插管时间和术后曲马多镇痛次数;采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者术后2、4、6、24、48 h镇痛效果,患者VAS评分>4分时给予曲马多镇痛。结果 QLB组患者术中舒芬太尼用量和术后镇痛次数显著少于TAPB组(P<0.05),且苏醒时间和拔管时间显著短于TAPB组(P<0.05)。术后2、4、6 h时,QLB组患者VAS评分显著低于TAPB组(P<0.05);2组患者术后24、48 h时VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 在全身麻醉腹腔镜手术中,超声引导下QLB的效果优于TAPB。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the analgesic effect between ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block(QLB) and transversus abdominis plane block(TAPB) in laparoscopic operation.Methods A total of 160 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia in the Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected as the subjects.The patients were divided into QLB group (n=78) and TAPB group (n=82).The nerve blocks of the patients in the two groups were completed before the induction of general anesthesia.The patients in QLB group were given 3.75 g·L-1 ropivacaine 20 mL on the posterior surface of bilateral quadratus lumborum under ultrasound guidance.The patients in TAPB group were given 3.75 g·L-1 ropivacaine 20 mL in the bilateral obliquus internus abdominis and fascia of rectus abdominis muscle respectively under ultrasound guidance.The sufentanil dosage,palinesthesia time,tracheal cannula removal time and the times of postoperative tramadol analgesia of the patients in the two groups were recorded.The analgesic effect was evaluated by Visual analogue scale (VAS) at the time points of 2,4,6,24 and 48 h after operation.The tramadol was used to relieve pain in patients with VAS score greater than 4.Results The sufentanil dosage and the times of postoperative analgesia in QLB group were significantly less than those in TAPB group (P<0.05).The palinesthesia time and extubation time in QLB group were significantly shorter than those in TAPB group (P<0.05).The VAS score in QLB group was significantly lower than that in TAPB group at the time points of 2,4 and 6 h after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at the time points of 24 and 48 h after operation (P>0.05).Conclusion The effect of ultrasound guided QLB is better than TAPB in the laparoscopic operation under general anesthesia.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中国加速康复外科专家组.中国加速康复外科围手术期管理专家共识:2016[J].中华外科杂志,2016,54(6):413-418.
[2] 中国医师协会麻醉学医师分会.促进术后康复的麻醉管理专家共识[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2015,35(2):146-148.
[3] HNBNER M,BLANC C,ROULIN D,et al.Randomized clinicaltrial on epidural vs paIient-conIrolled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway[J].Ann Surg,2015,261(4):648-653.
[4] 侯轶楠,郝建华,陈小红,等.盐酸羟考酮注射液对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后内脏痛和切口痛的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(10):916-918.
[5] HEBBARD P,FUJIWARA Y,SHIBATA Y,et al.Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane(TAP) block[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2007,35(4):616-617.
[6] 朱炜楷,隋鸿锦,付元山,等.胸腰筋膜解剖结构的研究进展[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2016,34(3):355-358.
[7] BLANCO R.Tap block under ultrasound guidance:the description of a "no pops" technique[J].Region Anesth Pain Med,2007,32(5):130.
[8] 秦朝生,柳元铭,刘敬臣.腹横肌平面阻滞的临床应用进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(7):713-716.
[9] BANTEL C,TRAPP S.The role of the autonomic nervous system in acute surgical pain processing:what do we know[J].Anaesthesia,2011,66(7):541-544.
[10] 乔迎帅,卢锡华.超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞用于下腹部手术患者术后镇痛效果的观察[J].实用医学杂志,2015,31(7):1137-1139.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘红波,杨 军,丁 浩.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(09):841.
[2]张译心,王秀美,薛晓玲.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂对保守性腹腔镜手术后卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者疼痛及生殖激素水平的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(8):785.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.020]
 ZHANG Yi-xin,WANG Xiu-mei,XUE Xiao-ling.Effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on pain and reproductive hormone levels in patients with ovarian endometriosis after conservative laparoscopic surgery[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):785.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.020]
[3]范毛川,余沁楠,朱 峰,等.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放性前列腺癌根治术治疗早期前列腺癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(8):748.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011]
 FAN Mao-chuan,YU Qin-nan,ZHU Feng,et al.Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the treatment of early prostate cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):748.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.08.011]
[4]王政强,王 春.腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(4):386.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.04.020]
 WANG Zhengqiang,WANG Chun.Comparison of the curative effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):386.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.04.020]
[5]彭荣芳,林 芳,钟爱群,等.保留子宫的腹腔镜后路骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗中重度中盆腔缺陷疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(2):156.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.02.013]
 PENG Rongfang,LIN Fang,ZHONG Aiqun,et al.Effect of laparoscopic posterior approach sacrospinous ligament suspension with preservation of uterus in the treatment of moderate and severe mid pelvic defects[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):156.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.02.013]
[6]关新垒,华彩红,王世进,等.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(3):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
 GUAN Xinlei,HUA Caihong,WANG Shijin,et al.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of giant hysteromyoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):243.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.010]
[7]郭祥翠,王倩青,李 力,等.纳米炭与吲哚菁绿在腹腔镜早期宫颈癌根治术中前哨淋巴结示踪效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(10):955.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.10.012]
 GUO Xiangcui,WANG Qianqing,LI Li,et al.Comparison of sentinel lymph node tracking effect between carbon nanonarticles and indocyanine green in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):955.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.10.012]
[8]赵 刚,张朝阳,乔师师,等.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中胆总管不同缝合方式效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(11):1080.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.11.017]
 ZHAO Gang,ZHANG Chaoyang,QIAO Shishi,et al.Comparison of the effect of different suture methods of common bile duct in laparoscopic choledocholithotomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(8):1080.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.11.017]
[9]杨振方.开腹手术史对腹腔镜结肠癌根治术效果的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(2):178.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.020]
 YANG Zhen-fang.Influence of laparotomy history on laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):178.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.020]
[10]王 珂,李宛玲,姜克萍.腹腔镜囊肿剥除术与腹腔镜囊肿电凝术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(3):271.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.016]
 WANG Ke,LI Wan-ling,JIANG Ke-ping.Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic oophorocystectomy and laparoscopic electrocoagulation in the treatment of ovarian endometriosis cyst[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):271.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.03.016]
[11]王卫华,杨红军,王尚柯,等.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(2):182.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017]
 WANG Weihua,YANG Hongjun,WANG Shangke,et al.Comparison of the application effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic myomectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(8):182.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.02.017]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-05