[1]申帅辉,王 玲,郝 文,等.单腔气管插管二氧化碳人工气胸对行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者的肺保护作用[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(7):592-596.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.07.011]
 SHEN Shuai-hui,WANG Ling,HAO Wen,et al.Protective effect of single-lumen endotracheal intubation and continuous carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax on the lung of patients undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(7):592-596.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.07.011]
点击复制

单腔气管插管二氧化碳人工气胸对行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者的肺保护作用
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年7
页码:
592-596
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Protective effect of single-lumen endotracheal intubation and continuous carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax on the lung of patients undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
作者:
申帅辉1王 玲2郝 文1毛英杰2
(1.新乡医学院,河南 新乡 453003;2.中国人民解放军第150中心医院麻醉科,河南 洛阳 471031)
Author(s):
SHEN Shuai-hui1WANG Ling2HAO Wen1MAO Ying-jie2
(1.Xinxiang Medical University,Xinxiang 453003,Henan Province,China;2.Department of Anesthesia,the 150th Central Hospital of the Chinese PLA,Luoyang 471031,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
食管癌人工气胸胸腹腔镜单腔气管插管
Keywords:
esophageal cancerartificial pneumothoraxthoracoscopy and laparoscopysingle-lumen endotracheal intubation
分类号:
R735.1R614
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.07.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察单腔气管插管二氧化碳人工气胸对行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者的肺保护作用。方法 选择2016年12月至2017年6月于中国人民解放军第150中心医院择期行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。观察组患者采用单腔气管插管后持续注入二氧化碳气体建立手术侧人工气胸,术中持续进行双肺通气;对照组患者采用双腔气管插管后断开术侧肺通气,术中进行非术侧肺单肺通气,胸腔操作完成后恢复双侧肺正常通气;分别于气管插管前(T0)、观察组建立人工气胸/对照组单肺通气30 min(T1)、观察组建立人工气胸/对照组单肺通气60 min(T2)、观察组人工气胸结束后/对照组双肺通气30 min(T3)、手术结束时(T4)采集患者的颈内静脉血,采用酶联免疫吸附试验法测定血清中白细胞介素-4(IL-4)、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平;并记录2组患者T0、T1、T2、T3、T4时的血氧饱和度(SpO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)及气道峰压(Ppeak);比较2组患者术后3 d肺不张、肺部感染、低氧血症的发生率。结果 T0时2组患者血清IL-4、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、TNF-α水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者T1、T2、T3、T4时血清IL-4、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、TNF-α水平显著高于T0时(P<0.05);与对照组比较,观察组患者T1、T2、T3、T4时血清IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α水平显著降低(P<0.05),IL-4、IL-10水平显著升高(P<0.05)。T0时2组患者SpO2、PaO2、PaCO2比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T1、T2、T3、T4时2组患者SpO2比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);T1、T2时观察组患者PaO2、PaCO2显著高于对照组(P<0.05),但T3、T4时2组患者PaO2、PaCO2比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);T1、T2、T3、T4时观察组患者Ppeak显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者手术时间、术中出血量比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3 d,对照组和观察组患者并发症发生率分别为36.7%(11/30)和16.7%(5/30),观察组患者术后3 d并发症发生率显著低于对照组(χ2=7.040,P<0.05)。结论 单腔气管插管二氧化碳人工气胸对行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者肺损伤小,具有更好的肺保护作用。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the protective effect of single-lumen endotracheal intubation and continuous carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax on the lung of patients undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy.Methods A total of 60 patients who underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy in the 150th Central Hospital of the Chinese PLA from December 2016 to June 2017 were selected as the research subjects.The patients were divided into observation group(single-lumen endotracheal intubation and continuous carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax) and control group(double-lumen tracheal intubation and single lung ventilation) by random digits table method,30 cases in each group.The patients in the observation group underwent single-lumen tracheal intubation and artificial pneumothorax by continuous injection of carbon dioxide gas,and the double lung ventilation was continued during the operation.The patients in the control group were treated with double-lumen tracheal intubation,and the operating side lung ventilation was disconnected after tracheal intubation,and the non-operating side lung ventilation was performed during the operation,and the bilateral lung ventilation was restored after the thoracic operation.The internal jugular vein blood of the patients was collected at the time points of before tracheal intubation (T0),artificial pneumothorax establishment in the observation group or single lung ventilation in the control group for 30 min (T1),artificial pneumothorax establishment in the observation group or single lung ventilation in the control group for 60 min (T2),30 min after artificial pneumothorax in the observation group or double lung ventilation in the control group (T3),and the end of the operation (T4).The levels of serum interleukin-4 (IL-4),IL-6,IL-8,IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2),arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2),arterial blood carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) and airway pressure peak (Ppeak) of the patients in the two groups were recorded at the time points of T0,T1,T2,T3 and T4.The incidences of atelectasis,pulmonary infection and hypoxemia within three days after operation were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in serum IL-4,IL-6,IL-8,IL-10 and TNF-α levels between the two groups at T0 (P>0.05).The levels of serum IL-4,IL-6,IL-8,IL-10 and TNF-α at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly higher than those at T0 in the two groups (P<0.05).The levels of serum IL-6,IL-8 and TNF-α in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group at T1,T2,T3 and T4 (P<0.05);and the levels of serum IL-4 and IL-10 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at T1,T2,T3 and T4 (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the SpO2,PaO2 and PaCO2 between the two groups at T0 (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the two groups at T1,T2,T3 and T4 (P>0.05).The PaO2 and PaCO2 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at T1 and T2 (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in PaO2 and PaCO2 between the two groups at T3 and T4 (P>0.05).The Ppeak in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group at T1,T2,T3 and T4 (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05).With three days after operation,the incidence of complications in the control group and the observation group was 36.7% (11/30) and 16.7% (5/30) respectively,the incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=7.040,P<0.05).Conclusion Single-lumen endotracheal intubation and continuous carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax in thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy has less pulmonary injury and better pulmonary protection.

参考文献/References:

[1] 柳硕岩,黄书荣,王枫,等.单腔、双腔气管插管在胸腔镜联合腹腔镜下食管癌三野根治术中的应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2015,31(5):264-266.
[2] 孙亚林,白玉,李廷坤,等.单腔、双腔气管插管对胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术通气效果及肺损伤的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(28):2194-2197.
[3] 许淑云,刘晓晴.细胞因子和急性肺损伤[J].国外医学(呼吸系统分册),2001,21(4):197-199.
[4] 钱桂生.急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征研究现状与展望[J].解放军医学杂志,2003,28(2):97-101.
[5] 李志龙,王一心,臧建洲.不同食管癌根治术对患者术后肺功能及炎性因子水平的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(6):746-748,751.
[6] 李廷坤,李长生,吕帅国,等.小潮气量快频率双肺通气辅以二氧化碳气胸用于胸腔镜食管癌根治术患者气道管理的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2017,37(1):96-99.
[7] 刘文捷,李玉成.容许性高碳酸血症对胸腔镜手术患者血浆肿瘤坏死因子-α的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2009,25(6):926-928.
[8] 胡华琨,李强,彭夕华,等.允许性高碳酸血症在新生儿胸腔镜先天性膈疝修补术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2014,30(8):766-769.
[9] 刘亚非,郭明,张正迪,等.单腔气管插管CO2人工气胸法在全腔镜食管癌根治术中的安全性和可行性[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(12):2941-2943.
[10] 闫丽娟,李文志.胸科手术的单肺通气策略[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2016,37(1):49-53.
[11] 刘梦虓,余潇,熊章荣,等.单肺或双肺通气对人工气胸下行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者肺内分流率及氧合的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2016,38(24):2629-2633.

相似文献/References:

[1]原志庆,王凤荣,吴国祥,等.食管癌切除标本断端残留癌的流式细胞分析[J].新乡医学院学报,1991,8(01):012.
[2]彭明轩,张一峰.食管癌与贲门癌238例手术治疗及其并发症分析[J].新乡医学院学报,1992,9(01):048.
[3]刘玉梅,申维玺,姚卫华,等.氟尿嘧啶合并醛氢叶酸治疗食管癌疗效评价[J].新乡医学院学报,1995,12(02):123.
[4]原志庆,许春雷.瘤体内DNA倍体异质性与食管鳞状细胞癌病理特性的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,1995,12(01):005.
[5]常银江,马森林,王守义,等.上段食管癌切除后食管床内胃食管颈部吻合术[J].新乡医学院学报,1996,13(02):143.
[6]王俊英,李国群,董长宪,等.食管癌合并糖尿病患者的围手术期处理[J].新乡医学院学报,1996,13(02):151.
[7]陈国荣.中晚期食管癌夹心治疗近期疗效分析 [J].新乡医学院学报,1997,14(02):150.
[8]李慧清,李汉臣,杨红伟,等.不同食管胃吻合方法术后生活质量分析[J].新乡医学院学报,1997,14(03):213.
[9]郭玉军,吴阶清,刘新秋,等.双介入疗法治疗晚期食管癌[J].新乡医学院学报,1997,14(03):287.
[10]乔 刚 李汉臣 席红军 王忠民 崔 玉 韩培立 赵宝生.食管癌患者手术前后细胞免疫的变化[J].新乡医学院学报,1999,16(04):308.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-05