[1]曲　莉,郭西雨,李　蕊,等.HEOS宫腔镜与传统宫腔镜治疗宫内节育器嵌顿残留疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(7):581-583.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.07.008]
　QU Li,GUO Xi-yu,LI Rui,et al.Comparison of the effect between HEOS hysteroscopy and traditional hysteroscopy in the treatment of residue and incarceration of intrauterine device[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(7):581-583.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.07.008]
点击复制

HEOS宫腔镜与传统宫腔镜治疗宫内节育器嵌顿残留疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年7
页码:
581-583
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between HEOS hysteroscopy and traditional hysteroscopy in the treatment of residue and incarceration of intrauterine device
作者:
曲　莉; 郭西雨; 李　蕊; 张　洁
（秦皇岛市妇幼保健院妇二科，河北　秦皇岛　066000）
Author(s):
QU Li; GUO Xi-yu; LI Rui; ZHANG Jie
（Department of Gynecology，Maternal and Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao，Qinhuangdao 066000，Hebei Province，China）
关键词:
宫腔镜; 宫内节育器嵌顿; 冷刀切除术
Keywords:
hysteroscope; incarceration of intrauterine device; cold knife excision
分类号:
R713
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.07.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较HEOS宫腔镜与传统宫腔镜治疗宫内节育器嵌顿残留的临床效果。方法　选择2016年1月至2017年12月秦皇岛市妇幼保健院收治的宫内节育器嵌顿残留患者46例，根据治疗方法分为HEOS宫腔镜组和传统宫腔镜组，每组23例。对2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、膨宫液差值（术中膨宫液的入量与出量的差值）、取环成功率及并发症发生率进行比较。结果　HEOS宫腔镜组患者手术时间、术中出血量、膨宫液差值分别为（24.20±10.12）min、（14.25±6.52）mL、（310.1±180.3）mL；传统宫腔镜组患者手术时间、术中出血量、膨宫液差值分别为（28.52±12.43）min、（19.38±8.67）mL、（510.2±210.0）mL；HEOS宫腔镜组患者手术时间显著短于传统宫腔镜组（P<0.05），术中出血量和膨宫液差值显著少于传统宫腔镜组（P<0.05）。HEOS宫腔镜组患者取环成功率为100.00%（23/23），并发症发生率为4.35%（1/23）；传统宫腔镜组患者取环成功率为78.26%（18/23），并发症发生率为43.48%（10/23）；HEOS宫腔镜组患者取环成功率高于传统宫腔镜组（χ2=5.610，P<0.05），并发症发生率低于传统宫腔镜组（χ2=9.678，P<0.05）。结论　HEOS宫腔镜治疗节育器嵌顿残留取环成功率高，且手术时间短，术中出血量少，并发症发生率低。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the effect between HEOS hysteroscopy and traditional hysteroscopy in the treatment of residue and incarceration of intrauterine device.Methods　A total of 46 patients with residue and incarceration of intrauterine device were selected from January 2016 to December 2017 in Maternal and Child Care Center of Qinhuangdao.The patients were divided into HEOS hysteroscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group according to the treatment method，23 cases in each group.The operation time，intraoperative bleeding，the difference value of the uterine distending fluid （the difference between the amount of input and output of uterine distending fluid），the success rate of the intrauterine device removal and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results　The operation time，intraoperative bleeding and the difference value of the uterine distending fluid in the HEOS hysteroscopy group were （24.20±10.12） min，（14.25±6.52） mL and （310.1±180.3） mL respectively；and them were （28.52±12.43） min，（19.38±8.67） mL and （510.2±210.0） mL in the traditional hysteroscopy group respectively.The operation time in the HEOS hysteroscopy group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional hysteroscopy group （P<0.05），and the intraoperative bleeding and the difference value of the uterine distending fluid in the HEOS hysteroscopy group were significantly less than those in the traditional hysteroscopy group （P<0.05）.The success rate of the intrauterine device removal and the incidence of complications in the HEOS hysteroscopy group were 100.00% （23/23） and 4.35% （1/23），and them were 78.26%（18/23） and 43.48%（10/23） in the traditional hysteroscopy group.The success rate of the intrauterine device removal in the HEOS hysteroscopy group was higher than that in the traditional hysteroscopy group （χ2=5.610，P<0.05），and the incidence of complications in the HEOS hysteroscopy group was lower than that in the traditional hysteroscopy group （χ2=9.678，P<0.05）.Conclusion　HEOS hysteroscopy for the treatment of residue and incarceration of intrauterine device has the advantages of high success rate，short operation time，less intraoperative bleeding and low incidence of complications.

参考文献/References:

［1］　黄美嫩.宫内节育器应用研究进展探析［J］.医药前沿，2017，7（16）：347-349.
［2］　武向飞，黎荔.妇女宫内节育器放置的影响因素及研究进展［J］.中国妇幼保健，2016，31（10）：2237-2239.
［3］　张立.宫内节育器取出困难及对策的研究进展［J］.中国城乡企业卫生，2010，25（5）：106-107.
［4］　梁岚，赵仁峰.HEOS冷刀宫腔镜微剪分离术治疗重度宫腔粘连的临床效果［J］.广西医学，2018，40（6）：613-614，618.
［5］　王源，白昌民，何菊仙，等.腹腔镜治疗节育器盆腔异位6例临床分析［J］.吉林医学，2010，31（16）：2464.
［6］　张静明.宫腔镜、腹腔镜妇产科临床联合应用80例分析［J］.中国社区医师（医学专业），2010，12（19）：94-95.
［7］　李惠杰.常规方法宫内节育器取出失败原因分析［J］.中国综合临床，2004，20（6）：564-565.
［8］　AL SALEH A S，BERRIDGAN P，ANDERSON D，et al.Direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists for treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the outpatient setting：comparative economic evaluation［J］.Can J Hosp Pharm，2017，70（3）：188-199.
［9］　熊春秋，张杰，余菲.HEOS宫腔镜冷刀切除治疗Ⅰ～Ⅱ 型黏膜下子宫肌瘤的临床效果［J］.广西医学，2017，39（9）：1419-1421.
［10］　MAZZON I，FAVILLI A，COCCO P，et al.Does cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy reduce intrauterine adhesions：a retrospective study［J］.Fertil Steril，2014，101（1）：294-298.

相似文献/References:

[1]申玉红.宫腔镜联合B超检查诊断绝经后子宫出血45例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(03):197.
[2]段予新,申素芳,李玉洁.宫腔镜配合超声引导下射频治疗功能失调性子宫出血[J].新乡医学院学报,2006,23(05):448.
[3]禹爱琴,刘薇,岳青芬.宫腔镜电切术治疗黏膜下子宫肌瘤83例 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(02):165.
[4]李金锋.米索前列醇用于宫腔镜检查临床观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(03):272.
[5]付蕊红.宫腔镜联合腹腔镜在女性不孕症诊断及治疗中的应用[J].新乡医学院学报,2014,31(11):937.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2014.11.021]
[6]仝玉珠.宫腔镜辅助冷刀锥形切除术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ级宫颈上皮内瘤变疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(11):1001.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.014]
　TONG Yu-zhu.Clinical effect of hysteroscopic assisted cold knife conization in treating grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(7):1001.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.014]
[7]吴菲菲,朱端荣,周秋明,等.宫腔镜息肉切除术联合不同术后治疗方案治疗子宫内膜息肉疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(3):286.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.021]
　WU Feifei,ZHU Duanrong,ZHOU Qiuming,et al.Effect of hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with different postoperative treatment on endometrial polyps[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2020,37(7):286.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2020.03.021]
[8]寇建芳,孟跃进.宫腔镜检查联合血清人附睾分泌蛋白及糖类抗原和miR-21早期诊断子宫内膜癌的临床价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(2):185.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.022]
　KOU Jian-fang,MENG Yue-jin.Clinical value of hysteroscopy combined with serum human epididymis protein 4,carbohydrate antigen 125 and miR-21 in early diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(7):185.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.022]
[9]高亮,唐璟,孙鸿展.不同手术方式治疗Ⅱ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2023,40(1):059.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.01.011]
　GAO Liang,TANG Jing,SUN Hongzhan.Comparison of clinical effect of different surgical methods in the treatment of type Ⅱ cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2023,40(7):059.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.01.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-05