[1]韩建国,李　文,潘洪发,等.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与后路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(6):483-486.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.06.008]
　HAN Jian-guo,LI Wen,PAN Hong-fa,et al.Comparison of the effect between minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of recurrent lubar intervertebral disc protrusion[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(6):483-486.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.06.008]
点击复制

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与后路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的效果比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年6
页码:
483-486
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of recurrent lubar intervertebral disc protrusion
作者:
韩建国1; 李　文2; 潘洪发3; 李志卫3; 刘伟强3; 王炳武3
（1.潍坊医学院临床医学院，山东　潍坊　261042；2.寿光市第二人民医院骨科，山东　寿光　262700；3.潍坊市人民院脊柱外科，山东　潍坊　261042）
Author(s):
HAN Jian-guo1; LI Wen2; PAN Hong-fa3; LI Zhi-wei3; LIU Wei-qiang3; WANG Bing-wu3
（1.School of Clinical Medicine，Weifang Medical University，Weifang 261042，Shandong Province，China；2.Department of Osteology，the Second People′s Hospital of Shouguang City，Shouguang 262700，Shandong Province，China；3.Department of Spine Surgery，Weifang People′s Hospital，Weifang 261042，Shandong Province，China）
关键词:
腰椎间盘突出症; 复发; 椎间融合
Keywords:
lubar intervertebral disc protrusion; recurrence; interbody fusion
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.06.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术（MIS-TLIF）与后路腰椎椎体间融合术（PLIF）治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症（LIDP）的临床效果。方法　回顾性分析2014年5月至2016年5月潍坊市人民医院收治的29例复发性LIDP患者的临床资料，其中行MIS-TLIF 13例（MIS-TLIF组），行PLIF 16例（PLIF组）。比较2组患者的手术切口长度、术中失血量、术后引流量、住院时间及并发症情况。术后1 a采用日本骨科协会评分（JOA）标准评价腰椎功能，依据改良Macnab标准比较2组患者的临床效果。结果　MIS-TLIF组患者的切口长度、术中失血量、术后引流量及住院时间均显著小于PLIF组（P<0.05）。PLIF组和MIS-TLIF组患者的术前腰椎JOA评分分别为7.9±1.9、8.0±1.6，术后1 a的腰椎JOA评分分别为24.0±2.7、24.2±2.5，2组患者的术前、术后1 a的腰椎JOA评分组间比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；2组患者术后1 a的腰椎JOA评分与术前比较均显著增加（P<0.05）。术后1 a，PLIF组患者改良Macnab等级评定优良率为87.50%（14/16）；MIS-TLIF组患者改良Macnab等级评定优良率为84.62%（11/13）；2组患者的优良率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.380，P>0.05）。MIS-TLIF组术后并发症发生率为7.7 %（1/13），PLIF组术后并发症发生率为6.3%（1/16），2组患者的术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.020，P>0.05）。MIS-TLIF组患者中Ⅰ级融合8例（61.54%），Ⅱ级融合5例（38.46%）；PLIF组中Ⅰ级融合9例（56.25%），Ⅱ级融合7例（43.75%）；2组患者Ⅰ、Ⅱ级融合构成比比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.080，P>0.05）。结论　MIS-TLIF治疗复发性LIDP具有手术切口小、术中出血少、术后引流量少、住院时间短等优点，且临床效果与PLIF相当。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion（MIS-TLIF） and posterior lumbar interbody fusion（PLIF） in the treatment of recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc herniation（LIDH）.Methods　Twenty-nine patients with recurrent LIDP were selected from May 2014 to May 2016 in Weifang People′s Hospital and the clinical data were analyzed retrospectively.Thirteen patients were given MIS-TLIF(MIS-TLIF group） and sixteen patients were given PLIF(PLIF） group.The operative incision length，intraoperative bleeding volume，postoperative drainage volume，hospitalization time and complications were compared between the two groups.The lumbar function was evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association（JOA） score standard，and the clinical effect was compared between the two groups according to the modified Macnab standard one year after treatment.Results　The operativeincision length,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative drainage volumeand hospitalization time in MIS-TLIF group were significantly less than thosein PLIF group (P<0.05).The preoperative JOA score of lumbar function in PLIF group and MIS-TLIF group was 7.9±1.9 and 8.0±1.6 respectively,it was 24.0±2.7 and 24.2±2.5 respectively at one year after treatment,there was no significantdifference in the JOA score between the two groups before and one year after operation (P>0.05).The JOA score atone year after operation was significantly higher than that before operation in the two groups (P<0.05).According to the modified Macnab standard one year after treatment，the fineness rate of the patients in PLIF group was 87.50%（14/16），the fineness rate of the patients in the MIS-TLIF group was 84.62%（11/13）.There was no significant difference in the fineness rate betweenthe two groups (χ2=1.380，P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the MIS-TLIF group and PLIF group was 7.7%(1/13) and 6.3% (1/16) respectively,there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (χ2=0.020,P>0.05).There were 8 cases (61.5%) with gradeⅠ fusion and 5 cases (38.5%) with grade Ⅱ fusion in MIS-TLIF group,there were 9(56.3%) with grade Ⅰ fusion and 7(43.8%) with grade Ⅱ fusion,there was no significant difference in the constituent ratio with grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ fusion between the two groups (χ2=0.080,P>0.05).Conclusion　MIS-TLIF in treatment of recurrent LIDH has the advantages of less incision，less intraoperative bleeding，less postoperative drainage and shorter hospitalization time；and the clinical effect of MIS-TLIF is similar to that of PLIF.

参考文献/References:

［1］　ABD EL-KADER HEL B.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation［J］.Asian Spine J，2016，10（1）：52-58.
［2］　LI Z，TANG J,HOU S,et al.Four-year follor-up results of transforminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy［J］.J Clin Neurosci,2015,22(2):331-337.
［3］　王大伟，韩士章，蒋协远.骨科疗效评价标准的研究进展［J］.中华骨科杂志，2006，26（11）：779-782.
［4］　BRIDWELL K H，LENKE L G，MCENERY K W，et al.Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine.Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects［J］.Spine（Phila Pa 1976），1995，20（12）：1410-1418.
［5］　HEINDEL P，TUCHMAN A，HSIEH P C，et al.Reoperation rates after single-level lumbar discectomy［J］.Spine（Phila Pa，1976），2017，42（8）：e496-e501.
［6］　BURKHARDT B W，GRIMM M，SCHWERDTFEGER K，et al.318 lumbar disc surgery：clinical outcome of 85 patients with a mean follow-up of 32 years［J］.Neurosurgery，2016，63（Suppl 1）：192.
［7］　YOSHIHARA H，CHATTERJEE D，PAULINO C B，et al.Revision surgery for "real" recurrent lumbar disk herniation：a systematic review［J］.Clin Spine Surg，2016，29（3）：111-118.
［8］　BODIU A.Diagnosis and operatory treatment of the patients with failed back surgery caused by herniated disk relapse［J］.J Med Life，2014，7（4）：533-537.
［9］　DE KUNDER S L，VAN KUIJK S M J，RIJKERS K，et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion（TLIF） versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion（PLIF） in lumbar spondylolisthesis：a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］.Spine J，2017，17（11）：1712-1721.
［10］　范恒俊，王涛，何欢，等.单边和双边椎弓根钉棒内固定联合椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果比较［J］.山东医药，2016，56（16）：47-49.
［11］　付诚，王昱，蒋钰钢，等.经椎间孔腰椎间融合三维有限元分析［J］.上海交通大学学报，2015，49（12）：1876-1881.
［12］　姜星杰，姚羽，陈晓庆，等.单边固定融合与MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较［J］.中国骨伤，2015，28（4）：300-305.

相似文献/References:

[1]林少俊,张　瑜,潘建基,等.鼻咽癌复发患者回顾性分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(06):442.
[2]王敏芳 李民英 徐惠丽 陈彩霞 李亚东.米托蒽醌为主治疗难治及复发性急性非淋巴细胞白血病[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(04):283.
[3]杨拥民,张朝群,陈 霞.雪莲加ATP阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(05):369.
[4]杜云红,郝以辉,王新友.儿童期精神分裂症预后的影响因素分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(01):058.
[5]王梅英,滕清晓． 李红讯.复发性鼻息肉再手术治疗[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(01):045.
[6]薛松梅.肾病综合征复发患儿的健康指导[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(02):147.
[7]薛松梅.肾病综合征复发患儿的健康指导[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(02):147.
[8]陈治权.显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症107 例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):416.
[9]秦静英,孟令娜.精神分裂症80例复发原因及护理措施[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):452.
[10]陈治权.显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症107例[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):416.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-05