[1]余沁楠,侯国栋,薛向东,等.腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术临床疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(4):317-319.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.04.015]
　YU Qin-nan,HOU Guo-dong,XUE Xiang-dong,et al.Effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on the patients with prostate cancer[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(4):317-319.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.04.015]
点击复制

腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术临床疗效观察
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年4
页码:
317-319
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on the patients with prostate cancer
作者:
余沁楠; 侯国栋; 薛向东; 唐　钊
（新乡医学院第一附属医院泌尿外科，河南　卫辉　453100）
Author(s):
YU Qin-nan; HOU Guo-dong; XUE Xiang-dong; TANG Zhao
（Department of Urinary Surgery，the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University，Weihui 453100，Henan Province，China）
关键词:
前列腺癌; 腹腔镜; 前列腺癌根治术
Keywords:
prostate cancer; laparoscope; prostate cancer radical prostatectomy
分类号:
R737.25
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.04.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　探讨前列腺癌患者腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术的临床疗效。方法　选择2013年5月11日至2015年10月20日新乡医学院第一附属医院收治的88例前列腺癌患者为观察对象，根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组和开放组，每组44例。腹腔镜组患者行腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术，开放组患者行开放性耻骨后前列腺癌根治术。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后24 h疼痛评分、住院时间、并发症发生率、生化复发率及完全控尿率。结果　与开放组比较，腹腔镜组患者手术时间长（P<0.05），术中出血量少（P<0.05），术后24 h疼痛评分低（P<0.05），住院时间短（P<0.05）。开放组和腹腔镜组患者术后并发症发生率分别为31.82%（14/44）和27.27%（12/44），2组患者术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.218，P>0.05）。开放组患者术后1、2 a生化复发率分别为11.36%（5/44）和27.27%（12/44），腹腔镜组患者术后1、2 a生化复发率分别为6.82%（3/44）和18.18%（8/44），2组患者术后1、2 a生化复发率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.550、1.035，P>0.05）；开放组患者术后1、2 a完全控尿率分别为45.45%（20/44）和68.18%（30/44），腹腔镜组患者术后1、2 a完全控尿率分别为43.18%（19/44）和65.91%（29/44），2组患者术后1、2 a完全控尿率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.046、0.051，P>0.05）。结论　与开放手术比较，腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术具有术中出血量少、创伤小、患者住院时间短等优点。
Abstract:
Objective　To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on the patients with prostate cancer.Methods　Eighty-eight prostate cancer patients were selected in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from May 2013 to October 2015，and according to the operation method，they were divided into laparoscopy group and open group，with 44 cases in each group.The patients in the laparoscopy group were given application of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy，while the patients in the open group were given application of open pubic radical prostatectomy.Intraoperative time，intraoperative blood loss，pain score at 24 hours after operation，hospitalization time，incidence of postoperative complication，biochemical recurrence rate and total urinary control rate of the two groups were compared.Results　Compared with the open group，the operation time of laparoscopy group was longer（P<0.05），intraoperative blood loss was less （P<0.05），pain score at 24 hours after operation was lower （P<0.05），hospitalization time was shorter （P<0.05）.The incidence of postoperative complications was 31.82% （14/44） and 27.27% （12/44） in the open group and the laparoscopic group respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups （χ2=0.218，P>0.05）.The biochemical recurrence rate at one year and two years after operation in the open group was 11.36% （5/44） and 27.27% （12/44），while it was 6.82% （3/44） and 18.18% （8/44） in the laparoscopy group；there was no statistically significant difference in the biochemical recurrence rate at one year and two years after operation between the two groups（χ2=0.550，1.035；P>0.05）.The total urinary control rate at one year and two years after operation in the open group was 45.45% （20/44） and 68.18% （30/44），and it was 43.18% （19/44） and 65.91% （29/44） in the laparoscopy group；there was no statistically significant difference in the total urinary control rate at one year and two years after operation between the two groups（χ2=0.046，0.051；P>0.05）.Conclusion　Comparing with the open surgery，laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss，smaller wound for patients and shorter hospitalization time in treating patients with prostate cancer.

参考文献/References:

［1］　蒋晓东，周忠兴，刘伟民，等.经腹膜外途径腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术29 例报告［J］.临床泌尿外科杂志，2014，29（12）：1057-1060.
［2］　刘娜.舒适护理在改善前列腺癌腹腔镜根治术患者心理状况和降低其术后并发症的作用研究［J］.中国卫生统计，2016，33（2）：278-279.
［3］　于秀芝，朱清海，刘海龙，等.单纯腹腔镜与腹腔镜联合肛门内镜手术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用效果比较［J］.新乡医学院学报，2017，34（3）：224-227.
［4］　郝利娜，陈珂，鲁显福，等.脑电双频指数联合肌松监测在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术老年患者中的应用［J］.临床麻醉学杂志，2017，33（3）：248-251.
［5］　KATO T，HONDA Y，KURITA Y，et al.Lubiprostone improves intestinal permeability in humans，a novel therapy for the leaky gut：a prospective randomized pilot study in healthy volunteers［J］.PLoS One，2017，12（4）：e0175626.
［6］　YUH B，ARTIBANI W，HEIDENREICH A，et al.The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer：a systematic review［J］.Eur Urol，2014，65（5）：918-927.
［7］　BOEHM K，BEYER B，TENNSTEDT P，et al.No impact of blood transfusion on oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer［J］.World J Urol，2015，33（6）：801-806.
［8］　TURK I，DEGER I S，WINKELMANN B，et al.Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Experiences with 145 interventions［J］.Urologe A，2001，40（3）：199-206.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈赜,陈杰,严想元,等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,,():000.
[2]张会清,张英杰,窦启峰,等.经尿道电汽化切除术治疗前列腺癌[J].新乡医学院学报,2000,17(06):447.
[3]邹心忠.腹腔镜下卵巢良性肿瘤剥除术27例分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(03):212.
[4]牛保华,高新平,胡艳牧.p16 蛋白在前列腺癌的表达及其意义[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(04):251.
[5]周振华,苏国强,张保峰.开腹胆囊切除术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(04):301.
[6]程章林,党铁成.急性炎症期腹腔镜胆囊切除术43例分析 [J].新乡医学院学报,2006,23(01):000.
[7]朱翠兰.腹腔镜下保守手术治疗输卵管妊娠32例 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(03):259.
[8]孙继建,陈春晓,李海营.经尿道前列腺电切联合内分泌治疗高龄前列腺癌疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(05):519.
[9]林凛然,方碧梅.腹腔镜下手术治疗异位妊娠疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(01):060.
[10]陶桂娥,苏卫华.腹腔镜治疗休克型异位妊娠53例 TitleFilter('chTitle');[J].新乡医学院学报,2010,27(04):401.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-05