[1]闫骏宏,黄媛霞,徐海斌.Quadrant通道下微创经椎间孔椎体间融合与开放经椎间孔椎体间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(3):212-215.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.03.013]
　YAN Jun-hong,HUANG Yuan-xia,XU Hai-bin.Comparison study between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via Quadrant minimally invasive system and open transforaminal lumbar interboday fusion in treating lumbar degeneration disease[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(3):212-215.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.03.013]
点击复制

Quadrant通道下微创经椎间孔椎体间融合与开放经椎间孔椎体间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年3
页码:
212-215
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison study between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via Quadrant minimally invasive system and open transforaminal lumbar interboday fusion in treating lumbar degeneration disease
作者:
闫骏宏; 黄媛霞; 徐海斌
（新乡医学院第一附属医院骨科，河南　卫辉　453100）
Author(s):
YAN Jun-hong; HUANG Yuan-xia; XU Hai-bin
（Department of Orthopedics，the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University，Weihui 453100，Henan Province，China）
关键词:
腰椎退行性疾病; 微创; 经椎间孔椎体间融合
Keywords:
lumbar degeneration disease; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interboday fusion
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.03.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较Quadrant通道下微创经椎间孔椎体间融合（MIS-TLIF）与开放经椎间孔椎体间融合（TLIF）治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床效果。方法　回顾性分析2016年4月至2017年4月于新乡医学院第一附属医院行手术治疗的46例腰椎退行性疾病患者的临床资料，其中20例患者采用MIS-TLIF术式（MIS-TLIF组），26例患者采用开放TLIF术式（开放TLIF组），比较2组患者术中失血量、手术时间、切口长度、术后引流量、术后下床时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症及术后1、3、6、12个月疼痛视觉模拟（VAS）评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。结果　MIS-TLIF组患者术中失血量、切口长度、术后引流量、住院费用均少于开放TLIF组（P<0.05），术后下床时间、住院时间短于开放TLIF组（P<0.05）；2组患者手术时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后1、3个月，MIS-TLIF组患者疼痛VAS评分和ODI均低于开放TLIF组（P<0.05）；术后6、12个月，2组患者疼痛VAS评分和ODI比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组患者均无硬脊膜及神经损伤、内固定断裂等并发症发生；开放TLIF组患者术后发生伤口愈合延迟2例，切口感染1例，术后并发症发生率为11.5％（3/26）；MIS-TLIF组患者无术后并发症发生，术后并发症发生率为0.0％（0/20）；2组患者术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=2.471，P>0.05）。结论　Quadrant通道下MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病具有术中失血少、切口小、术后引流量少等优势，可作为治疗腰椎退行性疾病的首选手术方法。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion（MIS-TLIF）via Quadrant minimally invasive system and open transforaminal lumbar interboday fusion（TLIF） in treating lumbar degeneration disease.Methods　Clinical data of 46 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from April 2016 to April 2017 with lumbar degenerative diseases who were given operation treatment were analyzed retrospectively.Twenty patients underwent MIS-TLIF via Quadrant minimally invasive system（MIS-TLIF group） and twenty-six patients underwent open-TLIF（open TLIF group）.The blood loss，operative time，length of incision，volume of drainage after operation，time of ambulation，hospitalization time，hospitalization cost，postoperative complications，visual pain simulation （VAS） score and Oswestry disability index（ODI） at 1，3，6 and 12 months after operation were compared between the two groups.Results　The blood loss，length of incision，volume of drainage after operation，time of ambulation，hospitalization time，hospitalization cost in the MIS-TLIF group were less than those in the open TLIF group （P<0.05）;there was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups（P>0.05）.The VAS score and ODI of the MIS-TLIF group were lower than those of the open TLIF group at 1 and 3 months after surgery（P<0.05）;there was no significant difference in the VAS score and ODI between the two groups at 6 and 12 months after surgery （P>0.05）.There was no complication such as dural and nerve injury and internal fixation rupture in the two groups.In the open TLIF group，postoperative wound healing was delayed in two cases，postoperative incision infection occurred in one cases，the incidence of postoperative complication was 11.5%(3/26).In the MIS-TLIF group no postoperative complication occurred，the incidence of postoperative complication was 0.0%(0/20);the incidence of postoperative complications was not statistically significant between the two groups（χ2=2.471，P>0.05）.Conclusion　MIS-TLIF via Quadrant minimally invasive system has the advantages of less blood loss，incision and volume of drainage after operation in treating lumbar degenerative disease，and it can be used as the first choice for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.

参考文献/References:

［1］　LEE J H，LEE S H.Clinical usefulness of electrodiagnostic study to predict surgical outcomes in lumbosacral disc herniation or spinal stenosis［J］.Eur Spine J，2015，24（10）:2276-2280.
［2］　SALEEM S，ASLAM H M，REHMANI M A，et al.Lumbar disc degenerative disease: disc degeneration symptoms and magnetic resonance image findings ［J］.Asian Spine，2013，7（4）:322-334.
［3］　LO W L，LIN C M，YEH Y S，et al.Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degeneration［J］.Biomed Res Int，2015，2015: 168384.
［4］　HY K，BNGER C，NIEDERMAN B，et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion （TLIF） versus posterolateral instrumented fusion （PLF） in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up［J］.Eur Spine J，2013，22（9）: 2022-2029.
［5］　黎庆初，胡辉林，刘宝戈，等.多裂肌间隙入路微创手术治疗腰椎滑脱症［J］.中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2011，21（4）: 303-307.
［6］　刘涛，李长青，周跃，等.微创手术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度腰椎滑脱症的疗效观察［J］.中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2009，19（5）: 354-359.
［7］　刘海潮，李存孝，范德刚，等.椎弓根复合体钉钩系统治疗青年腰椎峡部裂［J］.中华全科医学，2013，11（7）:1007-1008.
［8］　桂凯红，张海燕，黄林，等.微创单侧入路双侧减压固定与开放双侧减压固定治疗单间隙腰椎管狭窄症疗效比较 ［J］.新乡医学院学报，2017，34（3）:228-230，234.
［9］　HARMS J，ROLINGER H.A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion （author′s transl）［J］.Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb，1982，120（3）: 343-347.
［10］　邵诗泽，张恩忠，付松，等.腰骶段多裂肌的形态特点及功能意义［J］.中国临床解剖学杂志，2010，28（1）: 17-19.
［11］　STEVENS K J，SPENCINER D B，GRIFFITHS K L，et al.Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies［J］.J Spinal Disord Tech，2006，19（2）: 77-86.
［12］　FOLEY K T，HOLLY L T，SCHWENDER J D.Minimally invasive lumbar fusion［J］.Spine，2003，28（15 Suppl）:S26-S35.
［13］　汤优，张为，申勇，等.经Quadrant通道下微创TLIF与开放TLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病疗效的对比研究［J］.中国矫形外科杂志，2012，20（21）:1935-1938.
［14］　高爱国，赵鹏，张钦，等.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病［J］.临床骨科杂志，2016，19（2）:141-143.
［15］　SHUNWU F，XING Z，FENGDONG Z.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases［J］.Spine，2010，35（17）:1615-1620.
［16］　VILLAVICENCIO A T，BURNEIKIENE S，ROECA C M.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion［J］.Surg Neurol Int，2010，1:12.
［17］　LEE K H，YUE W M，YEO W，et al.Clinicai and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion［J］.Eur Spine J，2012，21（11）: 2265-2270.
［18］　王冰.微创TLIF是否优于开放TLIF［J］.中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2014，24（5）:392-393.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵志庆.CT定位下微创血肿吸引术治疗高血压性脑出血180 例[J].新乡医学院学报,2006,23(05):493.
[2]李碧波,刘涛,李娜.加速康复外科理念在行脊柱融合术腰椎退行性疾病患者护理中的应用[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(11):1068.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.11.014]
　LI Bibo,LIU Tao,LI Na.Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in nursing of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases undergoing spinal fusion[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2022,39(3):1068.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2022.11.014]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-05