[1]闫 斌,张永光.自体筋膜与人工硬脑膜在硬脑膜修补术中的应用效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(1):069-71.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.01.017]
 YAN Bin,ZHANG Yong-guang.Comparison of the effect between autologous fascia and artificial duramater in duramatral neoplasty[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(1):069-71.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.01.017]
点击复制

自体筋膜与人工硬脑膜在硬脑膜修补术中的应用效果比较
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
35
期数:
2018年1
页码:
069-71
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between autologous fascia and artificial duramater in duramatral neoplasty
作者:
闫 斌张永光
(周口市中医院脑外科,河南 周口 466000)
Author(s):
YAN BinZHANG Yong-guang
(Department of Neurosurgery,Zhoukou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhoukou 466000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
自体筋膜人工硬脑膜硬脑膜修补术开颅手术并发症
Keywords:
autologous fasciaartificial duramaterduramatral neoplastycraniotomycomplication
分类号:
R651
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.01.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较自体筋膜与人工硬脑膜在硬脑膜修补术中的应用效果。方法 选取2014年2月至2017年5月于周口市中医院行开颅手术的高血压脑出血患者140例,根据硬脑膜修补方法分为观察组90例和对照组50例。观察组患者术中采用自体筋膜修补硬脑膜,对照组患者术中采用人工硬脑膜修补硬脑膜。对2组患者Glasgow昏迷量表(GCS)评分、日常生活活动(ADL)术及术后并发症发生率进行比较。结果 术后3个月,观察组和对照组患者ADL预后良好率分别为98.89%(89/90)、90.00%(45/50),观察组患者ADL预后良好率显著高于对照组(χ2=6.191,P<0.05)。术前2组患者GCS评分比较差异无统计学意义(t=2.362,P>0.05);2组患者术后3个月GCS评分均显著高于术前(t=7.123、9.612,P<0.05);术后3个月,观察组患者GCS评分显著高于对照组(t=5.710,P<0.05)。观察组患者术后脑脊液漏、切口感染、脑膨出及癫痫发生率分别为1.11%(1/90)、1.11%(1/90)、2.22%(2/90)、3.33%(3/90),对照组患者术后脑脊液漏、切口感染、脑膨出及癫痫发生率分别为10.00%(5/50)、8.00%(4/50)、12.00%(6/50)、14.00%(7/50),观察组患者术后脑脊液漏、切口感染、脑膨出及癫痫发生率显著低于对照组(χ2=6.191、5.704、5.514、4.429,P<0.05)。结论 在开颅手术中应用自体筋膜修补硬脑膜易于缝合,无排异反应,能显著改善患者预后,降低并发症发生率。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect between autologous fascia and artificial duramater in duramatral neoplasty.Methods A total of 140 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent craniotomy in Zhoukou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February 2014 to May 2017 were selected.The patients were divided into observation group(n=90) and control group(n=50) according to dural repair method.The autologous fascia was used to repair dura mater in the observation group,and the artificial duramater was used to repair dura mater in the control group.The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score,activity of daily living(ADL) and the incidence of postoperative complication were compared between the two groups.Results The eusemia rate of ADL in the observation group and the control group was 98.89% (89/90) and 90% (45/50) respectively at three months after operation,the eusemia rate of ADL in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=6.191,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in GCS score between the two groups before operation (t=2.362,P>0.05),the GCS score at three months after operation were significantly higher than that before operation in the two groups (t=7.123,9.612;P<0.05),the GCS score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group at three months after operation (t=5.710,P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal leak,incision infection,cenencephalocele and epilepsy was 1.11% (1/90),1.11% (1/90),2.22% (2/90) and 3.33% (3/90) respectively in the observation group;and the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal leak,incision infection,cenencephalocele and epilepsy was 10.00%(5/50),8.00%(4/50),12.00%(6/50) and 14.00%(7/50) respectively in the control group;the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal leak,incision infection,cenencephalocele and epilepsy in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=6.191,5.704,5.514,4.429;P<0.05).Conclusion The autologous fascia is easy to suture,and there is no rejection reaction.It can significantly improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the incidence of complications in duramatral neoplasty.

参考文献/References:

[1] GREEN A L,ARNAUD A,BATILLER J,et al.A multicentre,prospective,randomized,controlled study to evaluate the use of a fibrin sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair[J].Br J Neurosurg,2015,19(1):1-7.
[2] LIU J K,PATEL S K,PODOLSKI A J,et al.Fascial sling technique for dural reconstruction after translabyrinthine resection of acoustic neuroma:technical note[J].Neurosurg Focus,2012,33(3):E17.
[3] STENDEL R,DANNE M,FISS I,et al.Efficacy and safety ofa collagen matrix for cranial and spinal dural reconstruction using different fixation techniques[J].J Neurosurg,2008,109(2):215-221.
[4] REDDY M,SCHGGL A,REDDY B,et al.A clinical study of a fibrinogen-based collagen fleece for dural repair in neurosurgery[J].Acta Neurochir (Wien),2002,144(3):265-269.
[5] KELLER J T,ONGKIKO C M J R,SAUNDERS M C,et al.Repair of spinal dural defects.An experimental study[J].J Neurosurg,1984,60(5):1022-1028.
[6] BANKS N D,REDETT R J.Dural repair with grafts using the gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler[J].J Craniofac Surg,2008,19(4):1053-1055.
[7] MOIN H,MOHAGHEGHZADEH P,KHALILI H A.Cryocalcium glue:a new formulation for dural repair augmentation[J].J Res Med Sci,2005,10(3):139-141.
[8] 李文辉,吴日乐,岑莲.人工硬脑膜修补材料的研究及其临床应用[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2013,9(2):113-115.
[9] 郜宪礼,褚纪发,斯一夫.神经补片在颅脑损伤硬脑膜减张修补中的应用[J].浙江创伤外科,2008,13(6):507-508.
[10] 张念平,付振,王元飞,等.硬脑膜修补材料在神经外科手术中的应用[J].中国医学创新,2010,7(2):129-131.
[11] 徐恩多.局部解剖学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996:4-6.
[12] MARTNEZ-LAGE J F,PREZ-ESPEJO M A,PALAZN J H,et al.Autologous tissues for dural grafting in children:a report of 56 cases[J].Childs Nerv Syst,2006,22(2):139-144.
[13] 肖云浪,何伟,陈展鹏,等.扩大自体硬脑膜减张修补在去骨瓣减压术中的应用[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(2):123-124.
[14] 陶小虎.人工硬脑膜修补材料在神经外科的应用[J].中国组织工程研究,2012,16(12):2217-2220.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-01-05