[1]高　瑛,孙　岩,王席娟,等.极低出生体质量儿动脉导管未闭及动脉导管再次开放的高危因素分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2017,34(7):574-578.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.07.005]
　GAO Ying,SUN Yan,WANG Xi-juan,et al.Risk factors of patent ductus arteriosus and arterial ductus patency again in very low birth weight infants[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2017,34(7):574-578.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.07.005]
点击复制

极低出生体质量儿动脉导管未闭及动脉导管再次开放的高危因素分析
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
34
期数:
2017年7
页码:
574-578
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk factors of patent ductus arteriosus and arterial ductus patency again in very low birth weight infants
作者:
高　瑛; 孙　岩; 王席娟; 张美慧; 张家洁; 高　峰; 王红利; 王　莉
（河南省人民医院新生儿重症监护病房，河南　郑州　450000）
Author(s):
GAO Ying; SUN Yan; WANG Xi-juan; ZHANG Mei-hui; ZHANG Jia-jie; GAO Feng; WANG Hong-li; WANG Li
（Newborn Intensive Care Unit，Henan Provincial People′s Hospital，Zhengzhou 453003，Henan Province，China）
关键词:
早产儿; 极低出生体质量儿; 动脉导管未闭; 危险因素
Keywords:
premature infant; very low birth weight infants; ductus arteriosus patent; risk factors
分类号:
R272.1
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.07.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　探讨极低出生体质量早产儿动脉导管未闭（PDA）发生及引起早产儿动脉导管再次开放的危险因素。方法　选择2013年1月至2015年12月河南省人民医院收治的出生体质量<1 500 g的早产儿913例作为研究对象。分别于出生后3、7 d行床旁超声心动图检查，了解PDA的发生率、动脉导管自发关闭率及再次开放率。根据出生后3 d床边超声心动图检查结果将早产儿分为PDA组（n=467）和非PDA组（n=446）；根据出生后7 d床旁超声心动图检查结果将早产儿分为动脉导管关闭组（n=408）和动脉导管未关闭组（n=505)，将非PDA组早产儿再分为动脉导管关闭组（n=364）和动脉导管再次开放组（n=82）；采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析探讨引起PDA和动脉导管再次开放的危险因素。结果　出生后3 d PDA组和非PDA组早产儿的性别、分娩方式、羊水减少、胎膜早破、胎盘早剥、母孕期糖尿病、子痫、母孕期妊娠高血压综合征、贫血等情况比较差异均无统计学意义 （P>0.05），而胎龄、出生体质量、出生窒息病史、呼吸窘迫综合征、宫内窘迫、感染、代谢性酸中毒、呼吸支持、氧疗时间比较差异有统计学意义 （P<0.05）。早产儿出生后7 d 动脉导管关闭组和动脉导管未关闭组胎龄、出生体质量、出生窒息病史、呼吸窘迫综合征、宫内窘迫、感染、呼吸支持、氧疗时间比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；2组早产儿的性别、分娩方式、羊水减少、胎膜早破、胎盘早剥、母孕期糖尿病、子痫、母孕期妊娠高血压综合征、代谢性酸中毒、贫血等比较差异无统计学意义 （P>0.05）。446例非PDA早产儿出生后7 d 动脉导管再次开放组和动脉导管关闭组在胎龄、出生体质量、胎膜早破、宫内窘迫、出生窒息病史、呼吸窘迫综合征、感染、呼吸支持、氧疗时间等方面比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；2组早产儿在性别、分娩方式、羊水减少、胎盘早剥、母孕期糖尿病、子痫、母孕期妊娠高血压综合征、代谢性酸中毒和贫血等方面比较差异无统计学意义 （P>0.05）。Logistic回归分析结果显示，呼吸窘迫综合征、感染是PDA 发生的独立危险因素（P<0.05），胎龄和出生体质量为独立保护性因素（P<0.05）。结论　关注早产儿PDA发生的高危因素，早期预防PDA或动脉导管再次开放，可提高早产儿的存活率和生存质量。
Abstract:
Objective　To explore the risk factors of patent ductus arteriosus（PDA）and aterial ductus patency again in very low birth weight premature infants.Methods　Nine hundred and thirteen premature neonate with very low birth weight in Henan Provincial People′s Hospital from January 2013 to December 2015 were selected as study subject.Bedside ultrasoundcardiogram examination was performed at 3，7 d after birth to understand the incidence of PDA，spontaneous closure rate of ductus arteriosus and the rate of aterial ductus patency again of premature infants.The premature infants were divided into PDA group（n=467） and non PDA group（n=446） according to the result of bedside ultrasoundcardiogram examination at 3 d after birth；the premature infants were divided into ductus arteriosus closure group（n=408） and non ductus arteriosus closure group（n=505），and the premature infants in non PDA group were divided into ductus arteriosus closure group（n=364） and ductus arteriosus opening group（n=82） according to the result of bedside ultrasoundcardiogram examination at 7 d after birth.The risk factors of PDA and aterial ductus patency again were analysed by single factor analysis and logistic regression analysis.Results　There was no statistic difference in sex，birth mode，oligohydramnios，premature rupture of membranes，placental abruption，diabetes mellitus in pregnancy，eclampsia，hypertension syndrome of pregnancy and anemia of premature infants beteen the PDA group and non PDA group at 3 d after birth（P>0.05）；there was statistic difference in gestational age，birth weight，birth asphyxia history，neonatal respiratory distress syndrome（NRDS），fetal distress，infection，metabolic acidosis，respiratory support，oxygen therapy time premature infants between the PDA group and non PDA group at 3 d after birth（P<0.05）.There was statistic difference in gestational age，birth weight，birth asphyxia history，NRDS，fetal distress，infection，respiratory support,oxygen therapy time of premature infants between ductus arteriosus closure group and ductus arteriosus opening group at 7 d after birth（P<0.05）；there was no statistic difference in sex，birth mode，oligohydramnios，premature rupture of membranes，placental abruption，diabetes mellitus in pregnancy，eclampsia，hypertension syndrome of pregnancy，metabolic acidosis and anemia of premature infants between the two groups at 7 d after birth（P>0.05）.In 446 non PDA patients，there was statistic difference in gestational age，birth weight，premature rupture of membranes，fetal distress，birth asphyxia history，NRDS，infection，respiratory support,oxygen therapy time between ductus arteriosus closure group and ductus arteriosus opening group at 7 d after birth（P<0.05）；there was no statistic difference in sex，birth mode，oligohydramnios，placental abruption，diabetes mellitus in pregnancy，eclampsia，hypertension syndrome of pregnancy，metabolic acidosis and anemia between the two groups at 7 d after birth（P>0.05）.Logistic regression analysis showed that NRDS and infection were the independent risk factors of PDA，gestational age and birth weight were the protective factors of PDA（P<0.05）.Conclusion　Pay attention to the risk factors of PDA in premature infants，and early prevention and treatment of PDA or aterial ductus patency again can improve the survival rate and quality of survival of premature infants.

参考文献/References:

［1］　EIHASSAN N O，BIRD T M，KING A J，et al.Variation and comparative effectiveness of patent ductus arteriosus pharmacotherapy in extremely low birth weight infants［J］.J Neonatal Perinatal Med，2014，7（3）：229-335.
［2］　NOORI S，MCCOY M，FRIEDLICH P，et al.Failure of ductus arterious closure is associated with increased mortality in preterm infants［J］.Pediatrics，2009，123（1）：e138-e144.
［3］　BANCALARI E，CLAURC N，GONZALEZ A.Patent ductus arteriosus and respiratory outcome in premature infants［J］.Biol Neonate，2005，88（3）：192-201.
［4］　STOLL B J，HANSEN N I，BELL E F，et al.Neonatal outcomes of extremely pre-term infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network［J］.Pediatrics，2010，126（3）：443-456.
［5］　SEKAR K C.Protective strategies to prevent patent ductus arteriosus［J］.Chin Med J（Engl），2010，123（20）：2914-2918.
［6］　高环，李涛.早产儿动脉导管未闭的相关危险因素分析［J］.医学研究杂志，2016，1（45）：141-143.
［7］　TULINO V，DATTILO G，TULINO D，et al.A recurrent patent ductus arteriosus［J］.Int J Cardiol，2011，148（3）：e43-e44.
［8］　HERMES-DESANTIS E R，CLYMAN R I.Patent duetum arterious：pathophysiology and management［J］.J Perinatol，2006，26（suppl 1）：S14-S18.
［9］　OHLSSON A，WALIA R，SHAH S.Ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants［J］.Cochrane Dtabase Syst Rev，2008，23（1）：CD003481.
［10］　杨文庆，杨长仪，陈涵强.早产儿动脉导管未闭发病机制的研究进展［J］.国际儿科学杂志，2010，37（1））：26-28.
［11］　王乐，赵婷，李明霞.早产儿动脉导管未闭高危因素及并发症分析［J］.中国新生儿科杂志，2015，30（4）：273-276.
［12］　杨长仪，杨文庆，陈涵强，等.早产儿动脉导管持续开放相关并发症及预后分析［J］.中国新生儿科杂志，2012，27（2）：82-85.
［13］　董慧茹，何少茹，郑曼利，等.不同胎龄新生儿动脉导管自然闭合时间及心脏指数、外周血管阻力、血压的动态变化［J］.中华实用儿科临床杂志，2015，30（14）：1060-1063.

相似文献/References:

[1]薄涛,宋继宁,郑大铭.早产儿颅内出血58例影响因素分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2005,22(03):262.
[2]牛志民.多潘立酮干预早产儿喂养不耐受30例疗效观察 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(02):196.
[3]牛志民.苯巴比妥早期干预早产儿黄疸66例 [J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(03):265.
[4]徐淑岩,牛菲菲.早产儿呼吸暂停的观察与护理[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(02):207.
[5]唐成和,李树军,刘爱娟,等.早产极低出生体质量儿早期微量喂养[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(04):394.
[6]王锦华,杨秀艺,乔波涛.早期干预对早产儿脑性瘫痪发生的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2009,26(04):401.
[7]李卫东,钟晓,迟春昕,等.胎龄34周以上胃肠内喂养不耐受新生早产儿合理喂养方式研究[J].新乡医学院学报,2011,28(01):060.
[8]刘超,张桂欣.肺表面活性物质治疗晚期早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2012,29(08):623.
[9]李明超,邢　珊.早产儿脑损伤、母亲绒毛膜羊膜炎及脐动脉血白细胞介素-6水平的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(10):875.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.10.010]
　LI Ming-chao,XING Shan.Relationship among brain injury of preterm infant,maternal chorioamnionitis and interleukin-6 level in umbilical artery blood[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(7):875.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.10.010]
[10]张　冰,张卫星,常绍鸿,等.鼻塞式高频振荡通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2017,34(6):519.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.06.018]
　ZHANG Bing,ZHANG Wei-xing,CHANG Shao-hong,et al.Effect of nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2017,34(7):519.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.06.018]

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-05