[1]亢忠杰,王晓琴.不同超声影像引导平面下颈内静脉穿刺置管效果比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2017,34(2):139-142.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.02.016]
　KANG Zhong-jie,WANG Xiao-qin.Comparison of the effect of internal jugular vein puncture and catheterization under different ultrasonic image guidance axis plane plan[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2017,34(2):139-142.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.02.016]
点击复制

不同超声影像引导平面下颈内静脉穿刺置管效果比较
分享到：

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
34
期数:
2017年2
页码:
139-142
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect of internal jugular vein puncture and catheterization under different ultrasonic image guidance axis plane plan
作者:
亢忠杰; 王晓琴
（喀什地区第二人民医院麻醉科，新疆　喀什　844000）
Author(s):
KANG Zhong-jie; WANG Xiao-qin
(Department of Anesthesiology，Kashgar Prefecture Second People′s Hospital，Kashgar 844000，Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region，China)
关键词:
影像引导平面; 颈内静脉穿刺术; 超声引导
Keywords:
image guiding plane; internal jugular vein puncture; ultrasonic guidance
分类号:
R614.4
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.02.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的　比较不同超声影像引导平面下颈内静脉穿刺置管效果，探讨最佳的穿刺引导平面。方法　选取2014年6月至2016年6月喀什地区第二人民医院收治的需要颈内静脉穿刺置管患者159例，根据穿刺时的超声影像引导平面分为斜轴引导平面组、短轴引导平面组和长轴引导平面组，每组53例。比较3组患者的穿刺总时间、刺入目标血管时间、穿刺点数目、改变进针方向次数、置管成功率及并发症。结果　斜轴引导平面组患者穿刺总时间、刺入目标血管时间显著短于短轴引导平面组和长轴引导平面组（P<0.05），短轴引导平面组患者穿刺总时间、刺入目标血管时间显著短于长轴引导平面组（P<0.05）。斜轴引导平面组患者改变进针方向次数显著少于短轴引导平面组和长轴引导平面组（P<0.05），短轴引导平面组患者改变进针方向次数显著少于长轴引导平面组（P<0.05）。3组患者穿刺点数目比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。长轴引导平面组、短轴引导平面组和斜轴引导平面组患者一次性置管成功率分别为69.8%（37/53）、90.6%（48/53）、100.0%（53/53），斜轴引导平面组患者一次性置管成功率显著高于长轴引导平面组和短轴引导平面组（P<0.05），短轴引导平面组患者一次性置管成功率显著高于长轴引导平面组（P<0.05）。长轴引导平面组、短轴引导平面组和斜轴引导平面组患者总置管成功率分别为94.3%（50/53）、96.2%（51/53）、100.0（53/53），3组患者总置管成功率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。斜轴引导平面组、短轴引导平面组和长轴引导平面组患者并发症发生率分别为0.0%（0/53）、9.4%（5/53）、24.5%（13/53）；斜轴引导平面组患者颈内静脉穿刺置管并发症发生率显著低于短轴引导平面组和长轴引导平面组（P<0.05），短轴引导平面组患者颈内静脉穿刺置管并发症发生率显著低于长轴引导平面组（P<0.05）。结论　与长轴引导平面、短轴引导平面相比，斜轴引导平面下颈内静脉穿刺置管可以有效提升穿刺置管效率和一次性置管成功率，减少改变进针方向的次数，降低并发症发生率。
Abstract:
Objective　To explore the optimal puncture guiding plane by comparing the effect of internal jugular vein puncture and catheterization under different ultrasonic image guidance axis plane plan.Methods　A total of 159 patients who needed internal jugular vein puncture and catheterization were selected in Kashgar Prefecture Second People′s Hospital from June 2014 to June 2016.All patients were divided into oblique axis guiding plane group，short axis guiding plane group and long axis guiding plane group according to the ultrasonic image guidance axis plane plan during the punctures，53 cases in each group.The total time of punctures，the time of piercing the target vessel，the number of needle hole，the number of times of changing the needling insertion direction，the success rate of catheterization and the complications were compared among the three groups.Results　The total time of puncture and the time of piercing the target vessel in the oblique axis guiding plane group were significantly shorter than those in the short axis guiding plane group and long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05)；the total time of puncture and the time of piercing the target vessel in the short axis guiding plane group were significantly shorter than those in the long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05).The number of times of changing the needling insertion direction in the oblique axis guiding plane group was significantly less than that in the short axis guiding plane group and long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05)，the number of times of changing the needling insertion direction in the short axis guiding plane group was significantly less than that in the long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the number of needle hole among the three groups(P>0.05).The one-time success rate of catheterization in the long axis guiding plane group，short axis guiding plane group and oblique axis guiding plane group was 69.8%(37/53)，90.6%(48/53) and 100.0%(53/53) respectively；the one-time success rate of catheterization in the oblique axis guiding plane group was significantly higher than that in the short axis guiding plane group and long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05)，and the one-time success rate of catheterization in the short axis guiding plane group was significantly higher than that in the long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05).The total success rate of catheterization in the long axis guiding plane group，short axis guiding plane group and oblique axis guiding plane group was 94.3%(50/53)，96.2% (51/53) and 100.0%(53/53) respectively；there was no significant difference in the total success rate of catheterization in the three groups(P>0.05).The incidence of complications in the oblique axis guiding plane group，short axis guiding plane group and long axis guiding plane group was 0.0%(0/53)，9.4%(5/53) and 24.5%(13/53)；the incidence of complications in the oblique axis guiding plane group was significantly lower than that in the short axis guiding plane group and long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05)，the incidence of complications in the short axis guiding plane group was significantly lower than that in the long axis guiding plane group(P<0.05).Conclusion　Compared with the long axis guiding plane and short axis guiding plane，oblique axis guiding plane can effectively promote the efficiency and one-time success rate of internal jugular vein puncture，reduce the number of times of changing the needling insertion direction and the incidence of complications.

参考文献/References:

［1］　朱波，张自强，陆海娟，等.超声定位与实时引导右颈内静脉穿刺置管用于急诊血液透析的价值［J］.中国中西医结合肾病杂志，2011，12（7）：597-599.
［2］　王永旺，喻文立，翁亦齐，等.超声引导亲体肝移植术患儿右颈内静脉穿刺置管术的价值［J］.中华麻醉学杂志，2013，33（11）：1400-1401.
［3］　吴文，聂昆，李敏，等.短轴平面与斜轴平面颈内静脉和颈总动脉超声解剖位置关系研究［J］.中国全科医学，2016，19（3）：364-367.
［4］　刘惠，于竞璟，邵丽，等.超声引导在小儿静脉穿刺置管中应用的 Meta 分析［J］.中华现代护理杂志，2014，20（21）2650-2653.
［5］　李静，付群，李青，等.超声引导技术在老年患者颈内静脉置管中的应用［J］.交通医学，2014，28（5）：508-509，512.
［6］　张龙新，林传涛，陈小琳，等.超声引导技术在新生儿颈内静脉穿刺置管中的应用［J/CD］.中华医学超声杂志：电子版，2012，9（6）：491-494.DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2012.06.007.
［7］　张承华，麻伟青，董发团，等.凝血功能障碍患者超声引导右颈内静脉置管的效果［J］.中华麻醉学杂志，2011，31（10）：1273-1274.
［8］　蔡珺.超声引导下的颈内静脉穿刺与置管后感染率的探讨［J］.中华医院感染学杂志，2012，22(10)：2111-2112.
［9］　尹加林，王晓亮，张媛，等.超声引导下颈内静脉穿刺置管在肥胖患者中的临床应用［J/CD］.中华临床医师杂志：电子版，2012，6（6）：1641-1642.DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.06.075.
［10］　权哲峰，池萍，李昕，等.不同超声方法引导患者颈内静脉穿刺置管效果的比较［J］.中华麻醉学杂志，2014，34（6）：767-768.
［11］　吴文，聂昆，夏婧，等.不同超声引导平面技术在颈内静脉穿刺置管术中的临床应用［J］.临床麻醉学杂志，2016，32（5）：449-452.
［12］　管飞，钱俊，倪艳，等.45°斜轴平面内与长轴平面内法在超声引导颈内静脉置管中的应用比较［J］.中国继续医学教育，2015，7（31）：121-122.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-05