[1]李勇杰,李 斌,魏荣华.吻合器经肛门直肠切除术治疗重度痔疮临床效果分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(12):1082-1084.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.017]
 LI Yong-jie,LI Bin,WEI Rong-hua.Clinical effect of stapled transanal rectal resection for treatment of severe hemorrhoids[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(12):1082-1084.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.017]
点击复制

吻合器经肛门直肠切除术治疗重度痔疮临床效果分析
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2016年12
页码:
1082-1084
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical effect of stapled transanal rectal resection for treatment of severe hemorrhoids
作者:
李勇杰李 斌魏荣华
(安阳地区医院普外二科,河南 安阳 455000)
Author(s):
LI Yong-jieLI BinWEI Rong-hua
(Department of NO.2 General Surgery,Anyang Regional Hospital,Anyang 455000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
吻合器经肛门直肠切除术吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术重度痔疮复发
Keywords:
stapled transanal rectal resectionprocedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidssevere hemorrhoidsrecurrence
分类号:
R615
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.12.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 评价吻合器经肛门直肠切除术治疗重度痔疮的临床效果,并探讨其对痔疮远期复发情况的影响。方法 选择河南省安阳地区医院收治的125例重度痔疮患者,根据手术方式将患者分为对照组58例(吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术)和观察组67例(吻合器经肛门直肠切除术),比较2组患者术中情况、临床疗效、住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症。对2组患者随访3 a,比较其复发率。结果 观察组患者的手术时间和住院费用显著高于对照组(P<0.05);2组患者的术中出血量和住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者术后7 d出血、疼痛程度、肛门坠胀感及肛周水肿情况均优于术后1 d(P<0.05);观察组患者在术后1 d的疼痛程度显著强于对照组(P<0.05),2组患者术后1 d出血情况、肛门坠胀感及肛周水肿评分和术后7 d的出血情况、疼痛程度、肛门坠胀感及肛周水肿评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者术后各发生尿潴留2例、感染1例、出血1例,2组患者术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者术后3 a复发率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术和吻合器经肛门直肠切除术均能有效治疗重度痔疮;尽管吻合器经肛门直肠切除术的手术时间及治疗费用高于吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术,但其远期复发率较低。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of stapled transanal rectal resection for treatment of severe hemorrhoids and explore the long-term recurrence rate.Methods One hundred and twenty-five patients with severe hemorrhoids in Anyang Regional Hospital were selected and divided into control group(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,58 patients)and observation group(stapled transanal rectal resection,67 patients)according to the operation methods.The intraoperative situation,clinical efficacy,length of stay,cost of hospitalization and postoperative complications of patients in the two groups were observed and compared.All of the patients were followed up for 3 years and the recurrence rate of patients in the two groups were compared.Results Operation time and cost of hospitalization of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).There were no significant difference of the bleeding volume and length of stay of patients between the two groups(P>0.05).The bleeding condition,pain degree,anal bulge feeling and crissum edema of patients at 7 days after operation were better than 1 day after operation in the two groups(P<0.05).The pain degree of patients at 1 day after operation in observation group was significantly stronger than that in control group(P<0.05);there were no statistic difference of the bleeding condition,anal bulge feeling and crissum edema scores at 1 day after operation and there were no statistic difference of the bleeding condition,pain degree,anal bulge feeling and crissum edema scores at 7 days after operation of patients between the two groups(P>0.05).There were two patients of urinary retention,one patient of infection and one patient of bleeding after operation in the two groups respectively,and there was no statistic difference of the rate of postoperative complication between the two groups(P>0.05).The recurrence rate of the patients at 3 years after operation in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Both procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and stapled transanal rectal resection can treat severe hemorrhoids effectively.The stapled transanal rectal resection have longer operation time and higher cost,but its long-term recurrence rate is lower.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李红,董玮,王晓乐,等.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与外剥内扎术治疗重度痔疮的效果分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(5):600-602.
[2] 朱兴柏.外剥内扎术与 PPH 治疗重度痔疮临床效果对比[J].白求恩医学杂志,2014,12(1):10-12.
[3] MIRABI N,FAZLANI M,RAISEE R.Comparing the outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection,delorme operation and electrotherapy methods used for the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome[J].Iran J Med Sci,2014,39(5):440-445.
[4] 赵敏,王振军,许艳春,等.痔上黏膜环型切除术和外剥内扎术治疗重度痔疮疗效观察[J].长春中医药大学学报,2015,31(3):615-617.
[5] 陶琦,江从庆,刘永安,等.吻合器经肛门直肠切除术治疗痔上黏膜环切钉合术术后直肠叠的疗效初探[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(3):207-209.
[6] 刘智勇,杨关根,邓群,等.部分吻合器经肛门直肠切除术联合Bresler术治疗直肠前突合并直肠内套叠疗效观察[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(5):566-570.
[7] BOCEASANTA P,VENTURI M,STUTO A,et al.Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction:a prospective muhicenter trial[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(8):1285-1297.
[8] ZBAR A P.Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsing haemorrhoids(PPH)and stapled transanal rectal resection(STARR)[J].Tech Coloproctol,2008,12(2):136-137.
[9] ZANELLA S,SPIRCH S,SCARPA M,et al.Long-term outcome of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR)versus stapled hemorrhoidopexys(STH)for gradeⅢ-Ⅳ hemorrhoids:preliminary results[J].In Vivo,2014,28(6):1171-1174.
[10] NALDINI G,FABIANI B,MENCONI C,et al.Tailored prolapse surgery for the treatment of hemorrhoids with a new dedicated device:TST starr plus[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2015,30(12):1723-1728.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-05