[1]陈 芳,杨 玲,王晓明,等.不同频率重复经颅磁刺激治疗恢复期脑梗死患者疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2016,33(6):480-482.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.06.009]
 CHEN Fang,YANG Ling,WANG Xiao-ming,et al.Effect of different frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment of convalescence cerebral infarction[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2016,33(6):480-482.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.06.009]
点击复制

不同频率重复经颅磁刺激治疗恢复期脑梗死患者疗效观察
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
33
期数:
2016年6
页码:
480-482
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of different frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment of convalescence cerebral infarction
作者:
陈 芳1杨 玲1王晓明2詹 成1王相明1朱 晨1李光宗1王 琰1
(1.攀枝花市中心医院神经内科,四川 攀枝花 617000;2.川北医学院附属医院神经内科,四川  南充 637000)
Author(s):
CHEN Fang1YANG Ling1WANG Xiao-ming2ZHAN Cheng1WANG Xiang-ming1ZHU Chen1LI Guang-zong1WANG Yan1
(1.Department of Neurology,the Central Hospital of Panzhihua City,Panzhihua 617000,Sichuan Province,China;2.Department of Neurology,the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan Province,China)
关键词:
脑梗死经颅磁刺激运动功能康复治疗运动诱发电位
Keywords:
cerebral infarctiontranscranial magnetic stimulationmotor functionrehabilitative treatmentmotor evoked potential
分类号:
R743.33
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2016.06.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨不同频率重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脑梗死(CI)恢复期患者的临床效果。方法 选择2009年12月至2011年1月在川北医学院附属医院接受重复rTMS治疗的CI恢复期患者96例,按治疗方法分为高频组(高频rTMS)、低频组(低频rTMS)和假刺激组,每组32例,对3组患者治疗前后的运动功能Fugl-Meyer评定量表(FMA)评分、Barthel指数(BI)、中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)及运动诱发电位(MEP)潜伏期进行比较。结果 治疗前3组患者FMA评分、BI、MEP潜伏期及CMCT比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后3组患者的FMA评分、BI显著高于治疗前(P<0.05),而MEP潜伏期及CMCT显著短于治疗前(P<0.05)。治疗后高频组和低频组患者的FMA评分及BI显著高于假刺激组(P<0.05),治疗后高频组和低频组患者的MEP潜伏期和CMCT均显著短于假刺激组(P<0.05)。治疗后高频组和低频组患者FMA评分、BI、MEP潜伏期及CMCT比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 高、低频rTMS均可以显著促进CI患者运动功能恢复,且二者效果相当。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the different frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) in treatment of convalescence cerebral infarction(CI).Methods Ninety-six patients with convalescence CI at recovery stage were selected in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from December 2009 to January 2011.The patients were divided into high frequency group(high frequency rTMS),low frequency group(low frequency rTMS) and sham stimulation group,thirty-two patients in each group.The Fugl-Meyer assessment(FMA) score of motor function,Barthel index(BI),central motor conduction time(CMCT) and motor evoked potential(MEP) latency were compared among the three groups before and after treatment.Results There was no significant difference in FMA score,BI,MEP latency and CMCT among the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).The FMA score and BI after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment(P<0.05),and the MEP latency and CMCT after treatment were significantly shorter than those before treatment in the three groups(P<0.05).The FMA score and BI in the high frequency group and low frequency group were significantly higher than those in the sham stimulation group after treatment(P<0.05).The MEP latency and CMCT in the high frequency group and low frequency group were significantly shorter than those in the sham stimulation group after treatment(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in FMA score,BI,MEP latency and CMCT between the high frequency group and low frequency group after treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion High and low frequency rTMS can significantly promote the recovery of motor function in patients with CI,and the effect is equivalent.

参考文献/References:

[1] JUNG S H,KIM Y K,KIM S E,et al.Prediction of motor function recovery after subcortical stroke:case series of activation PET and TMS studies[J].Ann Rehabil Med,2012,36(4):501-511.
[2] GONCHAR I A,PRUDYVUS I S,IUI S.Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J].Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova,2013,113(3 Pt 2):25-29.
[3] MICHOU E,MISTRY S,ROTHWELL J,et al.Priming pharyngeal motor cortex by repeated paired associative stimulation:implications for dysphagia neurorehabilitation[J].Neurorehabil Neural Repair,2013,27(4):355-362.
[4] 中华神经内科学会,中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管疾病的诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-381.
[5] DI LV,PELLEGRINO G,DI P G,et al.Val66Met BDNF gene polymorphism influences human motor cortex plasticity in acute stroke[J].Brain Stimul,2015,8(1):92-96.
[6] AURIAT A M,NEVA J L,PETERS S,et al.A review of transcranial magnetic stimulation and multimodal neuroimaging to characterize post-stroke neuroplasticity[J].Front Neurol,2015,6:226.
[7] PETOE M A,JAQUE F A,BYBLOW W D,et al.Cutaneous anesthesia of the forearm enhances sensorimotor function of the hand[J].J Neurophysiol,2013,109(4):1091-1096.
[8] SUNG W H,WANG C P,CHOU C L,et al.Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients[J].Stroke,2013,44(5):1375-1382.
[9] JIN Y,XING G,LI G,et al.High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for chronic neuropathic pain:a meta-analysis[J].Pain Physician,2015,18(6):E1029-E1046.
[10] TAKEUCHI N,OOUCHIDA Y,IZUMI S.Motor control and neural plasticity through interhemispheric interactions[J].Neural Plast,2012,2012:823285.
[11] EDWARDSON M A,LUCAS T H,CAREY J R,et al.New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation[J].Exp Brain Res,2013,224(3):335-358.
[12] KANDEL M,BEIS J M,LE C L,et al.Non-invasive cerebral stimulation for the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke:a review[J].Ann Phys Rehabil Med,2012,55(9/10):657-680.

相似文献/References:

[1]王泰安.复方丹参联用纳络酮治疗急性脑梗死31例[J].新乡医学院学报,2001,18(04):278.
[2]陈 娟,吕文国.黄芪注射液联合复方丹参注射液治疗急性脑梗死30例[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(02):083.
[3]李素芳,王艳.降纤酶联用低分子肝素治疗脑梗死疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(06):502.
[4]刘世峰,刘江峰.降纤酶与东菱克栓酶治疗急性脑梗死的临床对照观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(04):291.
[5]张思莲.脑梗死患者患侧股骨颈骨折术后护理[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(05):441.
[6]汪裕荣.灯盏花注射液治疗急性脑梗死128例[J].新乡医学院学报,2002,19(01):050.
[7]丁泽昌,吕荣亚.降纤酶治疗脑梗死40例临床疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):438.
[8]崔光琴,王凯。.脑梗死70例急性期血压变化[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(06):447.
[9]张晨光,沈琪琳,马振武,等.急性脑梗死患者血液流变学及血细胞参数的变化[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(03):177.
[10]周俐红,陈 娟.老年脑梗死合并感染30例分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2003,20(03):210.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-06-05