[1]赵 华,霍仙娜.基于目标控制的心脏康复模式对冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心脏储备功能和运动能力的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2021,38(8):775-780.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.08.016]
 ZHAO Hua,HUO Xianna.Effect of target control-based cardiac rehabilitation model on cardiac reserve function and exercise capacity of patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2021,38(8):775-780.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.08.016]
点击复制

基于目标控制的心脏康复模式对冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心脏储备功能和运动能力的影响
分享到:

《新乡医学院学报》[ISSN:1004-7239/CN:41-1186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年8
页码:
775-780
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of target control-based cardiac rehabilitation model on cardiac reserve function and exercise capacity of patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention
作者:
赵 华霍仙娜
(郑州市第七人民医院心血管内科CCU,河南 郑州 450000)
Author(s):
ZHAO HuaHUO Xianna
(CCU of Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,the 7th People′ s Hospital of Zhengzhou,Zhengzhou 450000,Henan Province,China)
关键词:
冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病心脏康复目标控制心脏储备功能运动能力
Keywords:
coronary atherosclerotic heart diseasecardiac rehabilitationtarget controlcardiac reserve functionexercise capacity
分类号:
R541.4
DOI:
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.08.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨基于目标控制的心脏康复模式对行经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)治疗的冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病 (CAHD)患者心脏储备功能及运动能力的影响。方法 选择2017年2月至2019年3月于郑州市第七人民医院心血管内科行PCI治疗的96例CAHD患者为研究对象,采用简单随机数字表法将患者分为对照组及观察组,每组48例。对照组剔除随访资料不全4例,最终纳入44例;观察组纳入48例。对照组患者PCI术后给予传统心脏康复模式管理,观察者患者PCI术后给予基于目标控制的心脏康复模式管理。分别于干预前及干预24周后,应用心脏超声心动图检测2组患者左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)等心功能指标,采用CAHD自我管理行为量表(CSMS)评估2组患者自我管理能力;分别于出院时及干预24周后,采用6 min步行试验(6MWT)评估2组患者运动能力,根据美国胸科协会/美国胸科医师协会制定的心肺运动试验指南完成心肺运动试验并记录峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)、峰值摄氧量占预计值的百分比(VO2peak%)、二氧化碳通气当量(VE/VCO2)等心脏储备功能指标,记录PCI术后24周内2组患者恶性心律失常、心绞痛、心力衰竭等心血管不良事件发生情况。比较2组患者心功能指标、自我管理能力、运动能力、心脏储备功能指标及心血管不良事件发生情况。结果 干预前,观察组与对照组患者不良嗜好、症状、情绪认知、疾病知识、日常生活、急救、治疗依从性评分比较差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者干预24周后不良嗜好、症状、情绪认知、疾病知识、日常生活、急救、治疗依从性评分均显著高于干预前(P<0.05);干预24周后,观察组患者不良嗜好、症状、情绪认知、疾病知识、日常生活、急救、治疗依从性各维度评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预前,观察组与对照组患者LVEDV、LVESV、LVEF比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者干预24周后LVEF显著高于干预前(P<0.05),LVEDV、LVESV与干预前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预24周后,观察组患者LVEF显著高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组与对照组患者LVEDV、LVESV比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。出院时,观察组与对照组患者6MWT比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者干预24周后6MWT显著高于出院时(P<0.05);干预24周后,观察组患者6MWT显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。出院时,观察组与对照组患者VO2peak、VO2peak%、VE/VCO2比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者干预24周后VO2peak、VO2peak%显著高于出院时(P<0.05),VE/VCO2与出院时比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预24周后,观察组患者VO2peak、VO2peak%显著高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组与对照组患者VE/VCO2比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组患者发生恶性心律失3例,心绞痛常2例,心力衰竭2例,心血管不良事件总发生率为15.91%(7/44);观察组患者仅发生恶性心律失1例,心血管不良事件总发生率为2.08%(1/48);观察组患者心血管不良事件总发生率显著低于对照组(χ2=3.923,P<0.05)。结论 基于目标控制的心脏康复管理模式可显著提高PCI术后CAHD患者心功能,有效改善心脏储备功能及运动能力,减少心血管不良事件,对PCI术后CAHD患者康复有显著效果。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of target control-based cardiac rehabilitation model on cardiac reserve function and exercise capacity of patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAHD) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A total of 96 patients with CAHD who underwent PCI in Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the 7th People′ s Hospital of Zhengzhou from February 2017 to March 2029 were selected as the study subjects,and the patients were divided into control group and observation group by using the simple random number table method,with 48 cases in each group.In the control group,4 cases with incomplete follow-up data were eliminated,thus finally there were 44 cases in the control groupthere were 48 cases in the observation group.The patients in the control group were given traditional cardiac rehabilitation model management after PCI,and the patients in the observation group adopted target control-based cardiac rehabilitation model management after PCI.Before intervention and after 24 weeks of intervention,cardiac echocardiography was used to detect the cardiac function indicators including the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV),left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients in the two groups.CAHD Self-Management Scale (CSMS) was applied to evaluate the self-management ability of patients in the two groups.Cardiopulmonary exercise test was completed according to the guidelines for cardiopulmonary exercise test developed by the American Thoracic Society/American College of Clinical Pharmacology,and the cardiac reserve function indicators including the peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak),percentage of peak oxygen uptake in predicted value (VO2peak%) and ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) were recorded.The occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events including the malignant arrhythmia,angina pectoris and heart failure were recorded in the two groups within 24 weeks after PCI.The cardiac function indicators,self-management ability,exercise capacity,cardiac reserve function indicators and occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results Before intervention,there were no significant differences in the adverse habits,symptoms,emotional cognition,disease knowledge,daily life,first aid and treatment compliance scores of patients between the control group and observation group (P>0.05).After 24 weeks of intervention,the adverse habits,symptoms,emotional cognition,disease knowledge,daily life,first aid and treatment compliance scores of patients in the two groups were significantly higher than those before intervention (P<0.05)the adverse habits,symptoms,emotional cognition,disease knowledge,daily life,first aid and treatment compliance scores of patients in observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).Before intervention,there were no significant differences in the LVEF,LVEDV and LVESV of patients between the control group and observation group (P>0.05).After 24 weeks of intervention,the LVEF of patients was significantly higher than that before intervention in the two groups (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the LVEDV and LVESV of patients after 24 weeks of intervention compared with those of before intervention in the two groups (P>0.05).After 24 weeks of intervention,the LVEF of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05),there were no significant differences in the LVEDV and LVESV of patients between the control group and observation group (P>0.05).Before intervention,there was no significant difference in the 6MWT of patients between the control group and observation group (P>0.05).The 6MWT of patients after 24 weeks of intervention was significantly higher than that at discharge in the two groups (P<0.05).After 24 weeks of intervention,the 6MWT of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).Before intervention,there was no significant difference in the VO2peak,VO2peak% and VE/VCO2 of patients between the control group and observation group (P>0.05).The VO2peak and VO2peak% of patients after 24 weeks of intervention were significantly higher than those at discharge in the two groups (P<0.05).There was no statistical significance in the VE/VCO2 of patients after 24 weeks of intervention compared to that at discharge in the two groups (P>0.05).After 24 weeks of intervention,the VO2peak and VO2peak% of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05),there was no significant difference in VE/VCO2 of patients between the control group and observation group (P>0.05).In the control group,there were 3 cases of malignant arrhythmia,2 cases of angina pectoris and 2 cases of heart failure,the total incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was 15.91% (7/44).In the observation group,there was only 1 case of malignant arrhythmia,the total incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was 2.08% (1/48).The total incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=3.923,P<0.05).Conclusion Target control-based cardiac rehabilitation management model for patients with CAHD after PCI can significantly enhance cardiac function,effectively improve cardiac reserve function and exercise capacity,and reduce adverse cardiovascular events.It has a significant effect on the rehabilitation of patients with CAHD after PCI.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王娟,郝琳,鹿庆华.老年冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后的体外反搏治疗[J].中华老年医学杂志,2019,38(5):484-487.
[2] 严婷婷,方红霞,高文娟,等.基于格林模式的健康教育在冠心病PCI术后患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(17):2327-2331.
[3] ZHANG Y,CAO H,JIANG P,et al.Cardiac rehabilitation in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention:a community-based study[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2018,97(8):9785-9789.
[4] 于成娟,顾爱峰,张晓芳.改良早期心脏康复在急性心肌梗死PCI术后患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(19):2632-2635.
[5] 卫生部政策法规司.中华人民共和国卫生标准汇编:2010年度下[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2011:43-60.
[6] 中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2016,44(5):382-400.
[7] 秦庆祝,李一聪,范晓青,等.时机理论对PCI患者自我管理行为和服药依从性的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(16):2058-2060.
[8] 杜舒婷,邢彬,张静等.负重呼吸操联合百令胶囊治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(10):758-762.
[9] THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY.ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2003,167(2):211-277.
[10] HANSEN T B,ZWISLER A D,BERG S K,et al.Cost-utility analysis of cardiac rehabilitation after conventional heart valve surgery versus usual care[J].Eur J Prevent Cardiol,2017,24(7):698-707.
[11] OZEMEK C,PHILLIPS S A,FERNALL B,et al.Enhancing participation in cardiac rehabilitation:a question of proximity and integration of outpatient services[J].Curr Probl Cardiol,2018,43(11):424-435.
[12] CASPER E A,EL WAKEEL L M,SALEH M A,et al.Management of pharmacotherapy-related problems in acute coronary syndrome:role of clinical pharmacist in cardiac rehabilitation unit[J].Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol,2019,125(1):44-53.
[13] ARENA R,ROULEAU C R,CAMPBELL T S,et al.Integrating science,practice,and mentorship in cardiac rehabilitation:the inaugural totalcardiology research network retreat[J].J Cardio-pulm Rehabil Prev,2019,39(5):290-292.
[14] WITTEKIND S,MAYS W,GERDES Y,et al.A novel mechanism for improved exercise performance in pediatric fontan patients after cardiac rehabilitation[J].Pediatr Cardiol,2018,39(2):1023-1030.
[15] 赵杰刚,尤炎丽,李春燕,等.个体化心脏康复教育模式对冠状动脉介入术后患者心脏康复认知及行为的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志,2019,35(12):901-906.
[16] 范凯利,杨惠云,武艳妮,等.Ⅰ期心脏康复运动对急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入术术后患者的临床效果研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2021,37(18):1394-1401.
[17] WU C M,MCKEON J,ABBOTT J D,et al.Referral to cardiac rehabilitation and outcomes for patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy[J].J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev,2019,39(3):e8-e11.
[18] 马晶茹,邰玉玲.早期心脏康复对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后疗效的影响[J].中国医科大学学报,2020,49(9):803-806.
[19] 李娟,康英,张兰,等.早期心脏康复管理在中国心外科手术后的发展现状[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2019,26(9):910-915.
[20] 高伟勤,赵婉晴,杨军.心脏康复治疗对AMI患者PCI术后预后的影响[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2020,29(4):406-409.

相似文献/References:

[1]吕风华,张素荣,张跃光,等.冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病合并充血性心力衰竭患者血浆脑钠肽水平的检测[J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(06):581.
[2]廖燕.老年冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者心功能与肺动脉压和心电指标的关系[J].新乡医学院学报,2012,29(09):696.
[3]郭鹏,李继红.不同类型冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者血浆D-二聚体和纤维蛋白原水平变化[J].新乡医学院学报,2012,29(09):698.
[4]李永锋,许志强,韩 鹏,等.冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病合并阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的临床分析 [J].新乡医学院学报,2012,29(10):784.
[5]舒 毅,陈幼萍,曾春平,等. 2型糖尿病合并冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者下肢血管病变相关因素分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(08):785.
[6]杨亚明,赵国安,冯春瑜,等.冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者的血脂代谢机制及药物治疗研究进展[J].新乡医学院学报,2021,38(10):996.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2021.10.020]
[7]许明发,王帅飞,苏国宝,等.不同血运重建方式治疗冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病合并左心室功能不全的早期疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(11):1018.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.018]
 XU Ming-fa,WANG Shuai-fei,SU Guo-bao,et al.Comparison of early outcomes of two kinds of revascularization on the patients with coronary heart disease complicated with left ventricular dysfunction[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2018,35(8):1018.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.11.018]
[8]欧红萍,李 彬,周凤勤.颈动脉超声检查联合血清超敏C 反应蛋白水平检测在冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病诊断中的应用[J].新乡医学院学报,2014,31(10):825.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2014.10.016]
[9]王 一.冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病合并二尖瓣疾病和心房颤动患者同期行冠状动脉搭桥联合二尖瓣置换术和双极射频消融术疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(2):155.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.013]
 WANG Yi.Clinical effect of coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement and bipolar radiofrequency ablation on the patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease combined with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):155.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.02.013]
[10]王 超,袁 宇.冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者肠道菌群丰度与血脂和血尿酸水平的相关性[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(7):623.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.07.006]
 WANG Chao,YUAN Yu.Correlation between gut flora abundance and blood lipid,blood uric acid levels in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease[J].Journal of Xinxiang Medical University,2019,36(8):623.[doi:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2019.07.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-05